Total Recall (12A)

Film

Science fiction

Colin Farrell in Total Recall

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>2/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Fri Aug 17 2012

The first question, of course, is: Why? Why take a film that has barely aged a day since its release in 1990 and subject it to the CGI remake treatment? The second, equally pressing, question is: Who? What director worth his stripes would even attempt such a folly, and who could he persuade to be in it?

To be fair, ‘Total Recall’ isn’t the unmitigated disaster many had predicted. Its future world is nicely detailed, if deeply derivative (rain, neon, Chinese people on bikes), the action sequences occasionally spark, and the central conceit of an economically and socially divided Earth linked by a lift passing through the planet’s core is interesting enough to almost – almost – begin to justify the project.

But the positives end there. As Doug Quaid, the seemingly ordinary Joe who finds out he’s really a double-agent super spy, Colin Farrell manages to be even less convincing than Arnold Schwarzenegger. The women in his life, especially Kate Beckinsale in the badass Sharon Stone role, are beyond dull, while poor Bill Nighy is relegated to a few portentous lines before being unceremoniously knocked off.

But the real culprit here is director Len Wiseman. There’s no denying his eye for a surprising angle and an unusual location – there’s a chase sequence set in and around a series of thundering cuboid elevators that could have been truly special. But the editing is so confusing and the action so logic- and consequence-free that it swiftly becomes almost unwatchable. The big showcase finale, as Bryan Cranston leads his robot troops into battle, is crushingly tedious: lights flash, explosions blare, everyone yells and it’s nigh-on impossible to tell what’s going on. ‘Total Recall’ is Hollywood at its worst: pointless, witless, and so very unnecessary. 

21

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

12A

UK release:

Wed Aug 29 2012

Duration:

118 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (15 ratings)
  • It is a bad version of the original there were no real deep story, No real plot, It was a all over the place, Why reboot possibly one of the greatest action science fiction movies of all time, Just to add some CGI and Beckinsale character is one of the most annoying, She seems to be everywhere. It is annoying walking like she is Rambo, She is a number of reasons the film fails, The best part of the movie is Colin Farrell

    John90 Thu Nov 1 2012
    Report
  • Fantastic, ignore reviews and don't think of the original film.

    Kevin Fri Oct 12 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • So different from the original that it shouldn't be compared with it. Highly enjoyable and in places very imaginative.

    Alan Fri Sep 21 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • Agree with the review. It's completely pointless - why even bother pretending it's a remake of the original movie, when all the good bits have been removed? Where are the mutants? My hopes were raised with the appearance of the triple-boobed woman, but it seems she was just a woman with three boobs! What happened to Mars? Why the American accents, if it all took place in a version of 'Britain' and Australia'? I'm sure I wasn't the only one watching who found Kate Beckinsale's hairdo really annoying - it just kept getting bigger and wavier and it kept getting into her eyes during fights. There was no real sense of purpose about anything - why was that big elevator such a threat to humanity? Was so disappointed that there was no creepy little psychic muppet guy, or any big red bug thing that Colin Farrell had to pull out of his nostril! The look of it was dull and monochrome. There was barely anything good about it. Colin Farrell and Jessica Biel are worth watching I suppose.

    Bad Wed Sep 12 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • We Can Remember It For You Beckinsale. Exactly what I expected, expensive, brainless, flashy and engaging while it lasted. Job done. And Kate Beckinsale wasn't too hard on the eyes neither!

    John Sun Sep 9 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • Another waste of time money & 118mins of your life if you wish to sit through this utter mince

    rogerrabbit Sun Sep 9 2012
    Report
  • dreadfully drab

    miles Fri Sep 7 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • worse film of the year i knew it was a mistake going to see this ,shud never been allowed to be a remake . cheap rip off bladerunner etc . story wht happened to tht , i robot was hundred times better . dont waste ya money on this total crap

    ady Fri Sep 7 2012
    Report
  • @Scrumpy, Cinema tickets for 1.30 !! The last time I saw cinema tickets for that price I think I was still in short trousers and that was a very very long time ago.. best price I have seen advertised is 4.50euro for unemployed.

    K. Flyer Thu Sep 6 2012
    Report
  • Enjoyable enough for me not to begrudge my £1.30, but serves mainly to demonstrate to film students that the 80's were the period for the REAL deal, blockbuster wise. Showed 2 19 year olds Verhoven's beauty before they went to see this. They LOVED it far more than this CGI fest. Still, this is still worth a cheap ticket...just don't "Get ready for a surprise" 6/10

    scrumpyjack Tue Sep 4 2012
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star