Underworld: Rise of the Lycans

Probably my least favourite of all the Underworld films due to a distinct lack of Beckinsale and 'those trousers'. I enjoyed seeing 'Tony Blair' as the lead wolf dude Lucian. Agree with the Time Out review about the overuse of CGI and artificial sets. Could the producers not spend a bit of extra money and film in a real castle or forest?? Anyway, after watching this film I actually think it might be best for new viewers to see this first and then follow it with the other Underworld films. That way, Lucian will be viewed as a good guy in the first film because you will understand his backstory. Still, I'm probably overthinking it... it's only Underworld.

The conversation was relaxed and she was laughing it off. ,

What more do I want? How about a good butt-fucking movie? I'm paying 9 dollars, jesus.

really good film blood at some parts doesnt luk good but it works!! but dont see this film if you havent seen the last two or u will just get confused and not understand the story but if uve seen the last 2 underworlds i recoment it the film is great , actors performed extremely well , especially lucian .. 4 star rating from me :)

the film wud hav 2 be da gr8ist film evs

i think that the prodominant issue that alot of critics forget when slamming a film like this one , is that its a prelude and should be watched with each of the other films in mind. and it works and it works well. the level of continuity carried on from the final 2 films is commendable. its rare to find in the film industry when that they keep characters regardles of the size of their role comeback and relating to single lines in a script to which scenes can be derived from. although not perfect some things were missing but forgivable. the creators of this film suceeded in making a film that starts the story for all the underworlds. lets not forget that the underworld films was never made with a triloigy in mind due to budgets but have managed over the years to keep pulling it out of the bag well done

Oh, come on! It wasn't that bad! Same as the others, but it shows the beginning, makes the millions for the Producer, what more do you want?!

these ppl that are negative about the film beats me why u even went to see it??? if all u wanted to do is critasize it!! it was beta than the 1st 2 imo

just great

they try to give this a haunting look with dark mean characters and plot twists which become inadvertently comic , it is neither entertaining nor arty but rather tiresome which you watch expecting something worthwhile will raise its head to intrigue you but what you get is a rather poorly scripted ,mediocre attempt at a werewolf vampire genre with unconvincing action , it had promise with its ambiant start though sheen is miscast as a action superhero , so is the female lead and they have no chemistry together ,which was what saved twilight alone. the only person worthy to watch is bill nighy as he brings a cold malicious poignance to his character but he alone is not enough to intrigue me to ever go near this movie again , after all cinema is more then one man carrying a show and everyone else was rather uninterested and it showed on the screen with a mediocre product and rather a non existent plot borrowed from some great classics of past