North London v South London - The debate

Time Out's Michael Hodges and Alan Rutter go head to head to explain what's wrong with North and South London



  • North London sucks
    | South London sucks

    'North London sucks,' argues Michael Hodges

    New_20 London NN.jpg

    So what’s wrong with north London? Partly it’s the place (an easy place to get to by black cab, I believe, a service still denied to those of us foolish enough to live beyond the Thames’s swirling waters). Take Parliament Hill. It’s not much more than a hillock compared to the towering peak Greenwich Observatory sits upon. Yet in film, books and plays it is endlessly celebrated.

    And Hampstead Village. An obvious target? Yes it is, and all the more reason to attack it. Self-regarding, snobbish, chocolate-box streets, chocolate-box pubs, sanitised and swept free of any vigour or vim. Or Camden Market? A woeful flea market, engineered to offer exotica and the whiff of danger to people who are not really sure about either exotica or the whiff of danger. Here you will encounter the Peruvian Hat, a sort of knitted headwear with ties that hang down at the sides. Fine in the windswept Andes with the chance of snow blowing up from Bolivia and a group of agitated llamas gathering around you with murder in their eyes, but the mark of an arse in an urban environment. Although it is a handy identifier in a fist fight.

    Of course hitting people just because they are from north London is wrong. And anyway it’s not the majority of people who live in north London who annoy – there are thousands of people who live useful lives in Tottenham and Barnet – but a particular kind of person who lives in a particular kind of way: the north Londoner. He or she will know the best coffee bars in Milan, yet be unable to name one of south London’s many wonderful pubs.

    They will express support for Arsenal football club (never Tottenham), yet know nothing of the game. The contents of their wardrobes will be predominately dark; names like Betty Jackson and Prada will appear there. There is a strong chance of a Japanese print in the downstairs toilet. And you won’t find them in Tottenham either, but in very specific areas: in Belsize Park, in Primrose Hill and in Tufnell Park.

    Take Lemonia in Primrose Hill, the house restaurant of the north Londoner. Who could complain about the fantastic Greek food at very reasonable prices, pleasing decor or the friendly service? Certainly not me: move the place to Peckham and I’d be in there every night. No, the problem is the ‘loyal tribe’, as one pro-north London website has it, that uses Lemonia. That’ll be ‘Jude Law, Ewan McGregor, Gwyneth Paltrow, Daniel Craig, Paddy Campbell and the PM and Sarah to name but a few!’ A few? That’s more than enough. They haven’t even mentioned Chris Martin.

    If you add the slightly less galling Stephen Fry and Geri Halliwell to the array of north London celebrities, you’ll find it runs the full gamut from classy to common (in south London we have that blonde woman who’s quite funny and, well, that’s about it), yet despite their social differences they all a share a similarly enraging worthiness.

    Because north Londoners don’t just eat in Greek restaurants and make odious pop records. They also care deeply about (my capitals) THE LESS FORTUNATE. You know, Tibetans, African people, little seals that get their heads bashed in. Some are even left wing; in fact wealthy north London is packed with socialists. Grand old socialists like Michael Foot, but also less grand, younger socialists who earn £120,000 a year as arts administrators and, strangely, find nothing as hateful and unpleasant as exposure to the working class. The same class, if memory serves, that socialism is suppose to propel to the commanding heights of the economy.

    Not in north London it won’t. And even if it did, north Londoners would still benefit, as they dedicate much of their spare time to pretending to be working class.

    That is why there are so many ersatz versions of the working man’s caff, from which the actual working man has been eliminated (see ‘socialism’ above), featuring checkerboard tablecloths and organic, free-range versions of real food. The bacon will be hand dried by Wiltshire yeomen, the sausages rolled by Tuscan peasant maids on their inner thighs. The tea will be so fairtrade that several Kenyan villages can now boast a Jacuzzi in each hut thanks to the proceeds. Breakfast will cost £19.47.

    However, since they are in the press so often, it is relatively easy to see beyond such lifestyle trappings – along with the pointless recycling, organic wine and other eco-concerned affectations that do little to mitigate the environmental damage wreaked by the Volvo in the driveway – and discover what actually matters to north Londoners.

    Hampstead residents Radio 1 DJ Edith Bowman and her boyfriend Tom Smith, of a pop group called Editors, are perhaps archetypal north Londoners. Rather than ‘feeding the world’ or ending communist China’s oppression of the Tibetan people (and how oppressive is it to remove a medieval government run by monks where women hold no power?), their real concern appears to be getting planning permission. In their case, for a basement.

    And last year, over in Islington, Derek Draper and Kate Garraway were reported to be ‘delighted’ and ‘excited’ when, after a passionate campaign – at one point Garraway shouted at council officials – they contrived to get planning permission for an extension so their baby could have his own room. The baby, I note, is called Darcey.

    However, it’s not the interesting names for their children, or the self-obsession – all those diets, all that idiot yoga, the tantric sex – but the self-righteous hypocrisy of rich north Londoners that is truly unbearable. They want to save the world but still send their children to public school. They claim to be true metropolitans yet cluster in exclusive villages.

    This isn’t urban life, it’s a cod bucolic nightmare populated by rampaging egotists who, understandably, would be beaten about the head with yellow murder boards if they ever strayed south of City Hall. This is north London, and it sucks.

    Agree? Disagree? Tell us below.

    North London sucks | South London sucks

  • Add your comment to this feature
  • Page:
    | 1 | 2 |

Of course hitting people just because they are from north London is wrong. And anyway it’s not the majority of people who live in north London who annoy – there are thousands of people who live useful lives in Tottenham and Barnet – but a particular kind of person who lives in a particular kind of way: the north Londoner. He or she will know the best coffee bars in Milan, yet be unable to name one of south London’s many wonderful pubs.They will express support for Arsenal football club (never Tottenham), yet know nothing of the game. The contents of their wardrobes will be predominately dark; names like Betty Jackson and Prada will appear there. There is a strong chance of a Japanese print in the downstairs toilet. And you won’t find them in Tottenham either, but in very specific areas: in Belsize Park, in Primrose Hill and in Tufnell Park.Take Lemonia in Primrose Hill, the house restaurant of the north Londoner. Who could complain about the fantastic Greek food at very reasonable prices, pleasing decor or the friendly service? Certainly not me: move the place to Peckham and I’d be in there every night. No, the problem is the ‘loyal tribe’, as one pro-north London website has it, that uses Lemonia. That’ll be ‘Jude Law, Ewan McGregor, Gwyneth Paltrow, Daniel Craig, Paddy Campbell and the PM and Sarah to name but a few!’ A few? That’s more than enough. They haven’t even mentioned Chris Martin.If you add the slightly less galling Stephen Fry and Geri Halliwell to the array of north London celebrities, you’ll find it runs the full gamut from classy to common (in south London we have that blonde woman who’s quite funny and, well, that’s about it), yet despite their social differences they all a share a similarly enraging worthiness.Because north Londoners don’t just eat in Greek restaurants and make odious pop records. They also care deeply about (my capitals) THE LESS FORTUNATE. You know, Tibetans, African people, little seals that get their heads bashed in. Some are even left wing; in fact wealthy north London is packed with socialists. Grand old socialists like Michael Foot, but also less grand, younger socialists who earn £120,000 a year as arts administrators and, strangely, find nothing as hateful and unpleasant as exposure to the working class. The same class, if memory serves, that socialism is suppose to propel to the commanding heights of the economy. Not in north London it won’t. And even if it did, north Londoners would still benefit, as they dedicate much of their spare time to pretending to be working class. That is why there are so many ersatz versions of the working man’s caff, from which the actual working man has been eliminated (see ‘socialism’ above), featuring checkerboard tablecloths and organic, free-range versions of real food. The bacon will be hand dried by Wiltshire yeomen, the sausages rolled by Tuscan peasant maids on their inner thighs. The tea will be so fairtrade that several Kenyan villages can now boast a Jacuzzi in each hut thanks to the proceeds. Breakfast will cost £19.47.However, since they are in the press so often, it is relatively easy to see beyond such lifestyle trappings – along with the pointless recycling, organic wine and other eco-concerned affectations that do little to mitigate the environmental damage wreaked by the Volvo in the driveway – and discover what actually matters to north Londoners.Hampstead residents Radio 1 DJ Edith Bowman and her boyfriend Tom Smith, of a pop group called Editors, are perhaps archetypal north Londoners. Rather than ‘feeding the world’ or ending communist China’s oppression of the Tibetan people (and how oppressive is it to remove a medieval government run by monks where women hold no power?), their real concern appears to be getting planning permission. In their case, for a basement.And last year, over in Islington, Derek Draper and Kate Garraway were reported to be ‘delighted’ and ‘excited’ when, after a passionate campaign – at one point Garraway shouted at council officials – they contrived to get planning permission for an extension so their baby could have his own room. The baby, I note, is called Darcey.However, it’s not the interesting names for their children, or the self-obsession – all those diets, all that idiot yoga, the tantric sex – but the self-righteous hypocrisy of rich north Londoners that is truly unbearable. They want to save the world but still send their children to public school. They claim to be true metropolitans yet cluster in exclusive villages.This isn’t urban life, it’s a cod bucolic nightmare populated by rampaging egotists who, understandably, would be beaten about the head with yellow murder boards if they ever strayed south of City Hall. This is north London, and it sucks.North London sucks | South London sucks

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 0/5 (0 ratings)
  • as a North Londoner. not a west Londoner or a East Londoner but as a North Londoner i was amused to discover that if you live in Thamsemead you dont have to pay council tazx because the place stinks.

    ray williams Fri May 18 2012
    Report
  • Haha sounds like the writers jelouse of South, he's pissed cos North London in reality is the souless, boring, non interesting part of London. South has diversity, in culture & in the fact the areas have their own 'feel' to them, South has character, North is just...North, its all the same, name a part of North that stands out above the rest of north? I was in North London the other day and it just all looks the same, depressing, boring, and echoed. Also, please dont count central, West, North West, & East as part of 'North' simply because its north of the river, as that is just stupid, lol. Out of all of London, I personally find North the most unappealing, and the people, the most stuck up, posh, & fake of all Londoners. They just wish they could boast the character and endearment of true Londoners, the ones from SOUTH!...haha.

    SoUThOne Mon Oct 4 2010
    Report
  • Thanks Josh for telling it like it is. As an Eastender I am fed up of being roped in with North London just because East London is above the river. The East End unlike North London is cutting edge like you said and interesting. I would not move anywhere to a postcode beginning with N, simply because it really is dull.

    Denise Thu May 27 2010
    Report
  • As a South Londoner, I have to say this was a very well-written, funny and perceptive article! I especially agree about how North London is compact and densely populated right up to the edge of the city (although there are exceptions, like Totteridge, which actually feels like a bit of Bromley that somehow got dislocated). But South London's appeal comes from the fact that it is more like separate towns rather than a continous sprawl. A trip from Wimbledon to Bexley feels like a cross-country adventure, and that's the appeal. I think the main difference is that North London is en route to the rest of the country, whereas South London is merely en route to Brighton and the English Channel. You really notice it on a trip back to London from the North. It takes you almost as long to navigate a few miles across the river as it does to zoom down the M1 from Birmingham into Hendon.

    Ken Leigh Mon Feb 8 2010
    Report
  • Why is it when ever this debate comes up, people always seem to neglect places like Blackheath and Greenwich? We are certainly South London, and most probably even more distanced from the likes of Richmond and Wimbledon than most "north" Londoners. Both by public, and private transport

    Doug Bryson Thu Aug 13 2009
    Report
  • south london is full of posh twats. merton, wandsworth, fulham, merton and westminster. north london is real london. hackney, harringey, islington and camden. another southern snob

    oh dear Tue Aug 11 2009
    Report
  • hampstead is north west you idiot. north london is islington, harringey and enfield .

    matt e Tue Aug 11 2009
    Report
  • North Londoners shouldn't really appropriate central london. it's not north london. Furthermore to talk of north London is a bit of a misnomer. West Londoners and east Londoners, probably the more interesting areas north of the river, wouldn't consider themselves north londoners. North London is that dull place north of central London and squeezed between the rich west and the cutting edge east.

    Josh Thu Jun 4 2009
    Report
  • Carlos please do not be tired of life! We begin as London began - with the Thames, on the Thames. Silvery lifeline, main highway, chief processional route, the Thames is, quite simply, London's Grand Canal. Tower Bridge, where we embark, and Westminster Bridge, where we go ashore, bracket London and to take ship on this stretch of water is to glissade down the centuries. Here kings and queens were borne in painted and gilt state barges; on the one shore, Wren's St.Paul's Cathedral engraved the sublime against the London sky; on the other, Shakespeare wrought his magic, "not of an age, but for all time!" The Thames knew great men and women in death, too: these waters bore Elizabeth I's funeral and Nelson's and Churchill's. And hand in glove with the history...the most famous of all London views, as throat-catching today as it was to Wordsworth 200 years ago: Earth has not anything to show more fair. Ashore, we take in the Tower of London, Westminster Abbey, St. James's Park, Whitehall, Buckingham and St. James's Palaces, the Mall and Trafalgar Square. As ever, the sights behind the sights is our watchword. In short, this is the walk that most memorably captures London's inimitable mixture of idiosyncratic detail and grand, powerful statement. O.Wilde ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Earth has not anything to show more fair: Dull would he be of soul who could pass by A sight so touching in its majesty: This city now doth, like a garment wear The beauty of the morning; silent, bare, Ships, towers, domes, theatres and temples lie Open unto the fields and to the sky, All bright and glittering in the smokeless air. Never did the sun more beautifully steep In his first splendor, valley, rock or hill; Ne'er saw I, never felt a calm so deep! The river glideth at his own sweet will: Dear God! the very houses seem asleep; And all that mighty heart is lying still! Wordsworth

    Taufik Sat May 23 2009
    Report
  • I'm surprised the writer (celebrities aside) was positive about Lemonia. We went there once and will never go back - awful! Holy Bush in hampstead is a must.

    cheryl Sat May 23 2009
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star