A Taste of Honey

Film

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong><span class='lf-avgRating'>5</span>/5
Rate this
 

Time Out says

A perfect example of how the 'New British Cinema' of the late '50s and early '60s has dated and become almost unwatchable. Richardson's version of Shelagh Delaney's play about a Salford girl getting pregnant after leaving home highlights the style's many faults: kitchen sink realism, when pursued as an end in itself, can be as tedious and unrevealing as an uninspired episode of Coronation Street. It's all very well dwelling on grimy streets, factory chimneys, sluttish individuals, and so on, but with no real attempt to place characters in an explicit social or political context, the story becomes reduced to a drab, voyeuristic celebration of ordinariness and poverty. There's no anger, no joy, and ultimately no insight in this film; its shallow reliance on clichés reeks of complacency.
0

Reviews

Add +

Release details

UK release:

1961

Duration:

100 mins

Cast and crew

Director:

Tony Richardson

Cast:

Murray Melvin, Robert Stephens, Dora Bryan, Rita Tushingham, Paul Danquah

Music:

John Addison

Art Director:

Ralph Brinton

Editor:

Antony Gibbs

Cinematography:

Walter Lassally

Screenwriter:

Tony Richardson, Shelagh Delaney

Producer:

Tony Richardson

Users say

0
<strong>Rating: </strong><span class='lf-avgRating'>0</span>/5

Average User Rating

5 / 5

Rating Breakdown

  • 5 star:1
  • 4 star:0
  • 3 star:0
  • 2 star:0
  • 1 star:0
LiveReviews|2
1 person listening
Emma Jones

Without doubt the most myopic and ridiculous review of any film I've ever read. He's completely missed the entire context and premise of the film. And the fact that it was light years ahead of its peers and rivals in terms of the subjects and taboos willing to be introduced, non-sensationalised and dealt with humanely, at a time when overt homosexuality in film would have been banned by the Lord Chancellor. Back to film critics's chool for you GA. Total fail.

Emma Jones

Without doubt the most myopic and ridiculous review of any film I've ever read. He's completely missed the entire context and premise of the film. And the fact that it was light years ahead of its peers and rivals in terms of the subjects and taboos willing to be introduced, non-sensationalised and dealt with humanely, at a time when overt homosexuality in film would have been banned by the Lord Chancellor. Back to film critics's chool for you GA. Total fail.