Avatar (12A)

Film

Fantasy films

Avatar 2.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>2/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Dec 15 2009

There’s a line from ‘Jurassic Park’ that echoed hauntingly through this critic’s head as ‘Avatar’ unfolded: ‘Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.’ James Cameron is one of those scientists: so in love with the technology, with the possibilities, that he never pauses to reflect upon the practicalities of cinema, of storytelling, of connecting with an audience.

That quote is doubly relevant when one considers the cultural similarities between these two blockbusters, both of which justified massive expense by promising a quantum leap forward in visual effects. But where Spielberg utilised technology in the service of a tight, witty script, Cameron is simply out to astound. There are moments when you almost expect Sam Worthington’s moody, ever-present voiceover to be replaced by the self-styled king of the world yelling at his audience: ‘Are you awestruck now? How about now? Now?’

When his scientist brother is killed a week before shipping out to the distant planet Pandora, wheelchair-bound US Marine Jake Sully (Worthington) is offered the chance to go in his place. On Pandora, Jake meets his avatar, a remote-controlled host body generated from his brother’s DNA and designed to blend in among the native Na’vi, a race of nine-foot blue hunter-gatherers living in peaceful harmony with their homeworld, Native American style.

Or rather, Native Californian: Na’vi civilisation is a mishmash of half-formed Hollywood ideas about the supposed superiority of ‘primitive’ cultures, tossing around buzzwords like ‘spirit’ and ‘energy’ without ever approaching a cohesive set of beliefs. But ‘all this tree-hugging shit’, as Jake describes it, is only the most obvious defect in Cameron’s dire, cliché-ridden script. From the bluntly expositional nature of the early scenes to the gung-ho, sub-‘Aliens’ banter of Jake’s fellow soldiers, this is screenwriting on autopilot, cobbling together unripe ideas without a scrap of originality or emotional resonance.

It’s hard to fault ‘Avatar’ as an immersive visual experience. Pandora and its luridly coloured inhabitants are beautifully designed, though none of this ever feels remotely real. But this was supposed to be the movie that changed the face of filmmaking forever. Ultimately, Cameron’s signature achievement may have been to prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, the oldest of all Hollywood maxims: all the money in the world is no subsitute for fresh ideas and a solid script.
99+

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

12A

UK release:

Thu Dec 17 2009

Duration:

161 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (355 ratings)
  • the flim was awsome i like the avatars coool

    Dark Angel Sun Jan 3 2010
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • I thought the film was hypacritical because it was all about the goody siding with the Red Indian like Pandorans. The film was all about non comercalism but then they sell the video game and the DVD which sends a confused message to the viewers but hte graphics were amazing.

    Arran Sun Jan 3 2010
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • and another thing....i didn't see any naíve worldviews in here, and i didn't find it preachy. in fact, it was a lesson in good capitalism. strike up relationships and you can exploit your resources for much longer. all these lefties claimin it was a native american/anti-imperialist sob story can do one. this film was about how people cut off their access to resources by being stupid.

    josslowe11 Sun Jan 3 2010
    Report
  • i don't think i've ever seen an action/sci fi film with a good script and plot. unless u count leon as an action film. ur watching the wrong genre for script and plot guys. this film did exactly what it said on the tin. i didn't listen to any of the dialogue for the first hour, i was look in at the flowers. which is how the film was marketed to me. as for the "native californian" comment...do some research. film reviewers r pretentious and they suck. snobs.

    jossLowe11 Sun Jan 3 2010
    Report
  • I watched it last night and came out very disappointed and cheated for paying £13, The visual and story is mish mash of Aliens, Pocahontas and bad guy turns good movie. The mix of live action and CGI cartoon didn't work at all and the 3D was nothing special, it was just extensive. The world of Pandora didn't feel authentic and real, even Starship Toopers looked more real and raw then this. Overall 2.5 hours of my life wasted and lost £13 (x2).

    Tuguldur Sun Jan 3 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Where are you taking the quote "snobby intellectuals" from? Snobby: yes. Intellectuals: no. Interesting how you added that bit ;) And why is a contempt for snobby people strange? People dont react badly to reviews that criticize the plot or cliches. Its the reviewers who insult people who like the film that get hammered. great film

    jeremykyle Sun Jan 3 2010
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • One thing that strikes me about these comments is this strange contempt for "snobby intelectuals" who "cannot understand entertainment". These people seem to fail to realize that some people wont be entertained by thin storylines made out of stock material and naive worldviews. Atleast I feel that having already seen so much special effects troughout my life, they have lost their entertainment value. Once the visuals wont impress anymore, the movie is going to stand or fall upon its plot...

    JHK Sat Jan 2 2010
    Report
  • this film was okay, it isnt really my type of film as i like romance, which this filmed did lack. ther was some but not much, it was too long aswell, and it seemed to be the same all the way through, ther was no big moments or twists, it was the same theme. i didnt really like it, but i guess it depends of wat type of film you like. it was okay tho, but couldnt really watch it agen. loves x

    princesscindiee Sat Jan 2 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Its quite hillaroius that any one can give st trinnians 2 stars,and give avatar the same.. this film is top 20 ever made

    jockcelt Sat Jan 2 2010
    Report
  • oh and i forgot about princess mononoke.......im sure cameron watched this when he got the idea......its like lucas v kirasawa all over again

    christian Sat Jan 2 2010
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
  31. 31
  32. 32
  33. 33
  34. 34
  35. 35
  36. 36
  37. 37
  38. 38
  39. 39
  40. 40
  41. 41
  42. 42
  43. 43
  44. 44
  45. 45
  46. 46
  47. 47
  48. 48
  49. 49
  50. 50
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star