Gulliver's Travels (PG)

Film

Family films

i4-GT-506.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>2/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>2/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Dec 21 2010

Like so many abridged versions of Jonathan Swift’s classic eighteenth-century novel, director Rob Letterman’s baggy adaptation eschews the writer’s extended travelogues in favour of debarking on the island of Lilliput and pretty much remaining there for the duration.

The camera first alights on the mailroom of the New York Tribune where one Lemuel Gulliver (Jack Black) continues his menial job as a postman. Conscious of, but happy with, his social standing among the newspaper’s high-flying bigwigs, Gulliver is nevertheless persuaded by a fellow colleague to improve his lot. So, using entire chapters plagiarised from Time Out and Fodor’s travel websites, he persuades Amanda Peet’s editor Darcy – for whom, of course, he has the hots – to commission him to do a write-up. She then sends him off to the mysterious and dangerously stormy Bermuda Triangle…

And so we set sail towards the main bulk of the storyline, as Gulliver washes up on the shores of an island occupied by a race of six-inch-high little people. At this juncture the film dances into Monty Python territory with pompous Regency characters flapping about spouting frivolous dialogue – none more so than Chris O’Dowd’s hawkish Graham Chapman-like general.

The film has a high old time playing with its clash of cultures but as a piece of storytelling it’s all over the place. Scenes crash into one another as if the whole structure was developed on the fly; we even get a bit of ‘Transformers’ thrown in for bad measure – and not one, but two romantic subplots. Black rolls out his amusing ‘School of Rock’ shtick a couple of times and there’s one especially comical homage to ‘Cyrano de Bergerac’. But mostly it veers between the very mildly chucklesome and plain not funny. Youngsters will doubtless enjoy the sight of a galoot galumphing around a model village, but the script is so dispiritingly slipshod that even they’ll be egging it on towards its foreseeable conclusion.
21

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

PG

UK release:

Sun Dec 26 2010

Duration:

87 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 2/5 (11 ratings)
  • MEH

    LUL Wed Feb 6
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • i havent watched it yet but it looks good

    danni Fri Jan 18
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • ur all wrong if u think dat this movie is rubbish because me and my family went to see it and even my 78 year old mum came out of the theater laughing. the movie is great and out of 10 id give it a 9

    michael Fri Jan 18
    Report
  • nice.

    paul Sun Sep 9 2012
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Truly, truly awful. Clearly this was put together purely as a money making excercise. How depressing. 2 hours of my life I will never get back.

    Alex Tue Oct 4 2011
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • It's depressing to see what Holly(crap)wood spits out these days. Jonathan Swift's satire was a good if not great literary achievement. Each place that Gulliver taveled to was an exageration of a social characteristic and was meant through the use of satire to point out our own faults and societies own vanities. As well as its redeemable possibilities. Watching this remake, I have to wonder if the screenwriters even read Jonathan Swift or know what satire is. And why oh God WHY does EVERYTHING that comes out of old plain dead washed up hollywood have to be about "the guy gets the girl" these days?! Why?! The original story had so much more depth to it. This is just garbage and everyone YES INCLUDING Mr. Black should be ashamed of themselve for their shoddy work. Other than that I give it a C-, that is if they were just trying to remake the first few pages of Swift's original work.

    Josh Tue Apr 26 2011
    Report
  • Can't believe the film industry is allowing the release of such a terrible screenplay, with bad 3d and special effects - and even worse, why do such eminent actors endorse the making of the film by allowing themselves to be associated with it. A total let down from every perception. Keep your money, buy the book and let your own imagination do the work!!!

    Cruzer Wed Feb 2 2011
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • this film was amazing! The actors line up Fantastic! although there wasn't much 3D action, it was a brilliant film and is great for young and old!! bit pricey but definitly worth it!!

    Charlotte Sat Jan 29 2011
    Report
  • i took my 9 year old son and his friend to see this today and it was the biggest load of pants i've seen in a long time, they were also completely underwhelmed to say the least. It seems the 3d badge is now an excuse to churn out endless rubbish at the expense of decent plots/story lines, and decent acting, £8.65 for each child and nearly £12 for me and then robbed at the till for 2 medium cokes and popcorn at £13.80 this was the maidenhead odeon but as im orginally from cumbria was interested to see how mugged i was! thank goodness it was only 1 hour and 25 minutes, incredible value, enjoy while it lasts odeon, your business model is doomed and do get me started on the cost

    Pete S Sat Jan 22 2011
    Report
  • can't wait to watch it my uncle and cousins loved it!

    imaan Sat Jan 22 2011
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star