Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (12A)

Film

Family films

migrate.29942.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>4/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Mon Jul 9 2007

A midsummer release seems inappropriate for ‘Harry 5’, with its intriguing aura of new-term blues, as a hormonally distracted Harry (Daniel Radcliffe), having escaped expulsion by the intervention of dear head Dumbledore (Michael Gambon), trudges back for a fifth year at Hogwarts carrying a burdensome weight on his more muscularly defined shoulders. But just because he’s paranoid, it doesn’t mean that they’re not out to get ’im. Irritable but resolute Harry knows by physical injury that evil Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) is gathering a new army, but his every step to recruit a rival one is dogged by the morons at the Ministry and their appointee as new headmistress, Dolores Umbridge (Imelda Staunton), a smiling villain in pink-knit twinset who nails up more interdicts than a riled Robespierre.

There’s a new director on board, and if Chris Columbus was enjoyable, Alfonso Cuarón dark, and Mike Newell aware that for all school sagas, familiarity breeds content, new helmsman David Yates is serious, almost grave. He swathes swiftly through JK Rowling’s doorstopper text with martial efficacy, clocking a crisp 138 minutes, the shortest of the series. He certainly keeps the scenes and action moving, but his no-nonsense approach leaves no time for games – please sir, can’t we play just a little Quidditch? – and the excision of scenes of lolling chat in study rooms will disappoint fans of Bunter and Tom Brown worldwide.

On the plus side, Harry gets his first, sweet screen kiss – to the warrior the spoils – from one of the increased quota of ethnic faces, cherubic new girl Cho (Katie Leung). Also, Evanna Lynch brings new, if blenched, blood with her endearing loony, Luna Lovegood; the production design is again an eclectic wonder, from the adumbrated Georgian mustiness of the secret Order of the Phoenix house to the Bazalgette-burnished tiles of the Victorian Ministry ‘Headquarters’ where stacked rows of jurors deliberate like Doges for Harry’s inquisition; and there are some spectacular CGI effects. Performances are more mature, the soundtrack (by Nicholas Hooper) less grandiose, and Yates executes some thrilling set-pieces – but, please, Mr Yates, don’t let these winds of modernity sweep too many beloved cobwebs away! Let’s hope he casts some more old-fashioned spells in part six, ‘The Half-Blood Prince’.

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 4/5 (130 ratings)
  • Urm.....only read like 1 book fell asleep.... harry poter is the worst film...really got no idea why all those nerds want to see it.

    nonofurbussines Sat Jul 14 2007
    Report
  • I enjoyed the film but you had to know the story to keep up. As a film it was OK but I was dissappointed with deviations from the book with chunks missed out or changed which for me lost their impact and integrity with the original script. Pehaps thats being picky. JKR appears to be happy with the films.

    Andy Sat Jul 14 2007
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • The only director that seems to have tapped into Jo Rowling's real vision of Hogwarts is Chris Columbus,let's drop these arty directors and get back to the true storylines!we're supposed to be building our characters,hating Draco a little more each time,becoming more convinced Snape's truly with Voldemort,and wishing a very painful ending to Umbridge! T

    Anna Sat Jul 14 2007
    Report
  • how am i ment 2 no i ant seen it yet!!!!!!!!!

    pierz Fri Jul 13 2007
    Report
  • Read The Review &x Watched The Trailer .. Looks Like A Must See =D Seein`gg It Tomorrow July 14th Wiff Ma Maates &x Bf Hehe.

    Emaa McCutcheOn Fri Jul 13 2007
    Report
  • omg cant wait till tonight, off to watch HP gunna be awesome, heard its the best yet, gettin a bit giddy now,

    sophie Fri Jul 13 2007
    Report
  • im a boy and i still think harry has good looks his films are so great

    BOB SNUDZ Fri Jul 13 2007
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • WERE GOING TO SEE THE FILM TONIGHT, WE CANT WAIT WEVE WAITED SO LONG TO SEE THE FILM, WE LOVE HARRY POTTER X X

    jodie n lisa Fri Jul 13 2007
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Very good, but a completely different take on the book compared to the other films. A lot less laughs and a lot less kiddies bits but not too much in the way of key story lines missed out. I love the books so im biased but altogether a brilliant film... just needs a bit more humour what happend to Fred and georges swamp?? and Ron getting attacked by Brains?? and proffessor Lockhart at the hospital!! all those bits werent there!! and a bit more shouting from harry he's meant to be totally mad that he has been abandoned all summer but he just seems frustrated! ah well i still enjoyed it bit seeing as it was so short they could probly have put those extras in! anyway peeps defeinitely a wicked film! xx

    nikky Fri Jul 13 2007
    Report
  • I'm sure the book must be better than this - the story is no further on by the end of the movie, too many characters appear without clear introduction for non=book readers, and the whole thing lacks any depth - stopped caring about the characters! Sorry.............

    Singe Thu Jul 12 2007
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star