Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (12A)

Film

Family films

migrate.29942.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>4/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Mon Jul 9 2007

A midsummer release seems inappropriate for ‘Harry 5’, with its intriguing aura of new-term blues, as a hormonally distracted Harry (Daniel Radcliffe), having escaped expulsion by the intervention of dear head Dumbledore (Michael Gambon), trudges back for a fifth year at Hogwarts carrying a burdensome weight on his more muscularly defined shoulders. But just because he’s paranoid, it doesn’t mean that they’re not out to get ’im. Irritable but resolute Harry knows by physical injury that evil Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) is gathering a new army, but his every step to recruit a rival one is dogged by the morons at the Ministry and their appointee as new headmistress, Dolores Umbridge (Imelda Staunton), a smiling villain in pink-knit twinset who nails up more interdicts than a riled Robespierre.

There’s a new director on board, and if Chris Columbus was enjoyable, Alfonso Cuarón dark, and Mike Newell aware that for all school sagas, familiarity breeds content, new helmsman David Yates is serious, almost grave. He swathes swiftly through JK Rowling’s doorstopper text with martial efficacy, clocking a crisp 138 minutes, the shortest of the series. He certainly keeps the scenes and action moving, but his no-nonsense approach leaves no time for games – please sir, can’t we play just a little Quidditch? – and the excision of scenes of lolling chat in study rooms will disappoint fans of Bunter and Tom Brown worldwide.

On the plus side, Harry gets his first, sweet screen kiss – to the warrior the spoils – from one of the increased quota of ethnic faces, cherubic new girl Cho (Katie Leung). Also, Evanna Lynch brings new, if blenched, blood with her endearing loony, Luna Lovegood; the production design is again an eclectic wonder, from the adumbrated Georgian mustiness of the secret Order of the Phoenix house to the Bazalgette-burnished tiles of the Victorian Ministry ‘Headquarters’ where stacked rows of jurors deliberate like Doges for Harry’s inquisition; and there are some spectacular CGI effects. Performances are more mature, the soundtrack (by Nicholas Hooper) less grandiose, and Yates executes some thrilling set-pieces – but, please, Mr Yates, don’t let these winds of modernity sweep too many beloved cobwebs away! Let’s hope he casts some more old-fashioned spells in part six, ‘The Half-Blood Prince’.

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 4/5 (130 ratings)
  • ithink it was alrite but could have been btter cant wait for the next one though

    Jemma Fri Aug 3 2007
    Report
  • Wag1 rudeeee. when me nd ma mandems went 2 eye dis flick, i didn't no dat ma bby galdem ws der wiv sum wasteman, so i merked him up on d spot standard. harry potter is sickkkkk sweardown holdtyt hilltopMans peace.

    kal Fri Aug 3 2007
    Report
  • I'm GOING to see it.....COME ON HARRY!!!

    Anon Fri Aug 3 2007
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • i watched this film last nyt wid a few frends nd i took my sister along with me nd i sat bak in the chair nd watched the hole film without talking it was amazin . . . i will defo buy this on dvd wen it comes out nd i advise eny1 hu hasnt watched it to do so xxxx

    Hannah Summers Fri Aug 3 2007
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Possibly the best HP film to date. The tone has really darkened; there is a real air of gathering menace. The Dementor attack is possibly the most frightening bit of cinema I've ever seen. The only thing I do have a problem with: Helena Bonham Carter's performance. If Bellatrix is to be a credible threat, she ought at least to be coherent...and sane enough to remember how to use a hairbrush.

    Alcina Thu Aug 2 2007
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • This is actually one of the worst films ive ever seen. It was so rushed that anyone who hasnt read the book doesent actually know or understand what is going on. The scenes are chopped together with newspaper cut outs and it just isnt a true representation of the book. Considering how well Lord of the Rings represents its books, why does the harry potter book series not have a great film to follow up with. This is why it will never be better than any Lord of the Rings films, Unless a real director grabs this film by the reins and guides it towards greatness.

    Peter Griffin Thu Aug 2 2007
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • As a grandmother i make it my duty to keep up with all the Harry Potter books and films, well thats my excuse and im sticking to it!!! when really i love them and think every one should see and read them cant wait for the next film.

    liz Wed Aug 1 2007
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • HARRY POTTER IS GONNA BE AWESOME IM RE-READIN DA BK SO I NO XACTLY WAT HAPPENS I MEAN I DONT WANNA MISS ANYTHIN LOL

    GRACIE Wed Aug 1 2007
    Report
  • Love it! Imaginative, gripping, cleverly mixes all the elements: adventure, comedy, romance and science-fiction. "Something for everyone" as they say. Looking forward to more...

    Rachel Wed Aug 1 2007
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • I liked the other Harry Potter films yet this film was the worst yet. It's extremely repetative and some parts seem rushed. The fight scenes and that are brilliant and the cast do a fantastic job but it's not that good a film. Everyone else seemed to like it except me lol

    Charley Tue Jul 31 2007
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star