Jude

Film

Period and swashbuckler films

Not yet rated

Be the first...

 

Time Out says

This determinedly non-heritage adaptation of Thomas Hardy's Jude the Obscure is an often impressive but oddly frustrating movie. Mostly, it's faithful to the story of the lowly but academically ambitious Wessex stonemason (Eccleston) who, after a disastrous marriage to Arabella (Griffiths), daughter of a pig farmer, heads off to the university town of Christminster, where he falls for his strong-willed, comparatively worldly-wise cousin Sue (Winslet). Somehow, however, the film never delivers the punch deserved by one of the 19th century's most movingly cruel English novels. Part of the trouble is that, in trying to cram Hardy's narrative into a mere two hours, Hossein Amini's brisk screenplay rarely does more than skate over the key dramatic moments. The leads, too, lack the chemistry to render the tragic outcome of Jude and Sue's socially unacceptable amour fou as devastating as it should be; Eccleston is too relentlessly 'intense' for Jude to seem a truly attractive prospect, while Winslet's Sue is such a thoroughly modern miss that she finally fails to convince. Eduardo Serra's 'Scope camerawork is eye-catching, and the film is never stilted, but it's hard to see how its emphasis on being 'modern' make the content really relevant to today. Ambitious, sensitive, but ultimately uninvolving.
2

Comments

Add +

Release details

UK release:

1996

Duration:

122 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 0/5 (0 ratings)
  • best

    Bivash Roy Tue Dec 4 2007
    Report
  • This is an engrossing film despite its failings. Does anyone expect a full length novel to be shown in its entirety in a two hour film? – no, we don’t, and there were many aspects of the story that could have been omitted without the film as such being affected. The death of the aunt, for example; or the countless train journeys (and some of the story lines that these were linking), or the weird scene of young Jude being taken to the horror show at the fair. In many cases the abbreviated scenes that became necessary produced dialogue of soap opera quality. Casting was not well thought out – Kate Winslet was no more a late nineteenth century girl than I am (and I was uncomfortable with the cigarette smoking, which didn’t ring true). And is June Whitfield ever going to be recognised for anything other than what she is, that is a much loved, long serving comedienne? Plus the odd bit of “spot the celebrityâ€� (James Nesbitt for example), was distracting. A fine film, with a very watchable climax, but it could have been so much better.

    Barry Fisher Wed Oct 3 2007
    Report
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star