Quantum of Solace

Film

Action and adventure

685.x600.film.quantum.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Mon Oct 20 2008

Revenge is a dish best served cold. Which, along with mean and lean, is how Daniel Craig plays 007 in Marc Forster’s slightly disappointing, furiously-paced, hi-tech, slash-and-burn sequel to the more leisurely, luxurious first ‘reboot’, ‘Casino Royale’.

James Bond – you’ll have to remember his Christian name as the arrogant cad neglects to announce it – is grieving the loss of lover and betrayer Vesper Lynd (Eva Green). You’d best remember the plot – and Lynd’s necklace – of the earlier film, too, as director Forster throws us immediately, eye-smackingly into the frenetic activity and globe-traversing travel that is the angry, increasingly unorthodox, ‘soul-destroyed’ world-saving agent’s way of dealing with betrayal, grief and loss.

Eight minutes of highly impressive, parallel-edited, SFX-assisted, stunt-laden action are up before the ears, eyeballs and brain get their first momentary repose. Before then, our hero chases down Mr White in the Aston dodgem-car through Alpine tunnels. Cough or blink and you’ll miss how our bold spooks link the last film’s Le Chiffre to bug-eyed faux environmentalist Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric), a destabiliser of US backyard governments with a laughable, pudding-basin haircut-ed sidekick. Almost immediately, he hops, skips and jumps across Siena’s roofs and the horse-loving, harlequin-ed Palio crowds – and we soon follow Bond ‘running wild’ from the palatial villas of Italy to the slums of Haiti, the neo-Reifenstahl opera houses of Vienna, and the menacingly beautiful, otherworldly moonscapes and deserts of Bolivia.

So much dash, flash and thrill – so many boat chases, tight rope-dangling fight scenes, bi-plane dogfights, architectural flourishes and flat-table computer displays – there’s scant time left for character, let alone, story, fun, seduction, humour or wit. You can sense the older, traditionalist viewers wanting to go home early to take their nostalgia pills. True, there are some cute one-liners – presumably the product of Paul Haggis’s polish of Neal Purvis and Robert Wade’s screenplay taken from producer Michael G Wilson’s first inspirational treatment and itself repeatedly pencil-marked by Forster and Craig.

Also, new Bond Woman Olga Kurylenko is impressive as 007’s Latin helpmeet Camille. But, strange for a supposedly ‘humanising’ franchise, Craig’s Bond comes dangerously close to being a cipher himself: only a ‘Bourne’-again, action superhero could perform his physical feats.

It’s a cynical movie, too: half the Brit agents are double and all the US spies seem untrustworthy – save Felix Leiter, of course, whom the excellent Jeffrey Wright reprises in arguably the film’s sole sympathetic, low-key performance. (Though, intriguingly, Judi Dench’s ‘M’ has gone all maternal – couldn’t she be renamed ‘SM’, for Surrogate Mum?) Okay, maybe real life is, pace Hobbes,  brutal, nasty and short – like this movie. But can’t we sneak in the odd moment for some occasional quiet conversation, maybe even a leisurely martini or a game of baccarat, even if we can’t afford luxury rail travel or –  God forbid – some protracted, guiltless sex? Go on, Bond, next time, indulge yourself a little more. We like to watch.
99+

Comments

Add +

Release details

UK release:

Fri Oct 31, 2008

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (139 ratings)
  • There is only one word for this film.... shocking.... i felt physically sick watching this. Sick of the the appalling action that is shot so close and chaotically that you can't see what's going on, sick of a weak and feeble storyline, sick of the theme tune, sick of the wooden acting. And the worst thing is I love Bond, I loved Casino Royale, I loved the new look Bond. I've read all the Bond books and loved the old look Bonds as well. But the director of this film should be put down for what he's done here. There aren't even any positives to try and off set the huge negatives. I walked into the cinema with huge expectations and came out feeling the weight of the world on my shoulders. Don't watch this film even out of curiosity to see how bad it is - it will leave you scarred!

    Rob Dyer Mon Dec 29 2008
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Utterly bereft of any entertainment value - do not waste your sponduliks

    k joe Sat Dec 27 2008
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Do you think, maybe DrE ,that you are taking the Bond franchise a little too seriously? No I haven't read the books, but I have never been attracted to them. There are so many more interesting things to read about. And as for Bond being a well rounded, 3D character in any of the films, don't make me laugh. His has always been a fantstical, cartoon-like world on screen. The films are merely an entertaining diversion for a couple of hours (and with an Unlimited card for Cineworld, pretty cheap thank you - highly recommended) In this respect, this one did what it was billed to do. Not a great film; I never said it was, but I quite liked seeing a colder side to him. By the end, he has got it out of his system. Imagine this: you are a trained killer and your lover is murdered, would you not lose it for a while? He has finally let someone get close (after losing his parents at a young age - thanks for that) and what happens? Fits if you ask me. The next one will be better. That's called optimism. Chill out, it's just a Bond film. Noone died.

    DV Wed Dec 17 2008
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • The next one will be better! What a sad mindless automaton must DV be – passing over money to watch a poorly scripted, poorly directed movie, planning hopes on a more acceptable film next time. Read the other reviews DV… Read the books… Bond is supposed to be University educated, hyper-intelligent, calculated, and super-suave and who puts brain before brawn. He was trained to be a secret agent from a teen, being recruited into the service after his parents were killed supposedly in a mountaineering accident. The current re-imagined Bond simply does not fill this mould. What we have on screen in this new adaptation is essentially a 40 year old street-kid that has been taught to kill like a thug and not a trained assassin. Between fights all he seems to do is a lot of running whilst developing a bit of an Oedipus complex for M – god help us if he beds her in the next Bond movie (potentially entitled a Bucketful of Puke)!!! His character has about as much depth as a puddle! This is how I imagined Bond to be portrayed if Vinnie Jones had won the role - which was apparently on the cards for a while. For a film to be successful, the producers, directors, scriptwriters and cast must give the audience what they want and must live up to and preferably exceed their expectations. Daniel Craig could make a very good Bond, but the scriptwriters and directors have let us down – big time – and Barbara Broccoli has let Bond fans down the most. DV, it’s not about being stuck in the 70s, it’s about the continuation of a legacy – 22 films over 46 years based on a single set of characters is a pretty amazing achievement. About the only thing they are trying to keep true to are the Maurice Binder style of opening titles. Daniel Kleinman did an admirable job on these throughout the Brosnan years but his last two have been below par. It’s just a shame to see the legacy whither.

    drEvil Tue Dec 16 2008
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • I'm a big baby who doesn't like change. I want everything to stay the same as it was in the 70's. And I can't understand a couple of very simple plot-lines. Perhaps I'm autistic? Waah waah waah! Reasonable film. Next one will be better. This one sets up the Bond character and gives him more depth. So to speak. Cool tune from The White Keys too. Give it a go.

    DV Tue Dec 16 2008
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • Unfortunately this has to be the worst film of the Bond franchise - even worse than OHMSS. Bond is meant to be much more than a Bourne-style action hero and regardless of how ludicrous a plot, the story needs to have more at stake than keeping Bolivia’s poor thirsty and charging them 20c a litre for Quantum’s supply. But then again, let's digress to the weaker plot of Casino Royale… Bond must play cards to bring down a villain? Why not just bash “Mr I’m so scary because I bleed tears out of one eye and can’t be bothered to get it fixedâ€� le Chiffre over the head, take him back to MI6 HQ and torture him until he talked then either kill him (new Bond) or put him into a situation where he could easily escape just to get killed at the last minute (old Bond)! Wouldn’t that have saved you 90 minutes of your life two years ago! Bring back a real Bond: suave, sophisticated, calculated, brutal, intellectual. Bring back the gadgets, bring back Ms Monneypenny. And for God’s sake bring back Q – and not a pathetic version as played by John Cleese – how about a more eccentric version ala Stephen Fry or a Desmond Llewelyn clone as in Richard Briers. Also, how about writing some decent opening music! Remember when the Bond themes used to get into the top 10? The last two themes appeared to be sung by constipated cats with anorexia. Overall a poor film that left me thinking why I bothered sitting though the 116 minutes of shaky CGI enhanced (using the term poorly as the shakes were probably put in to hide all of the bad CGI) footage – It could just have easily been (perhaps should have been) packaged as a Bourne film and enjoyed for what it is… an action film and not a Bond film. Before starting on the next movie let's hope the writers and directors sit back and watch some of the Bond classics - Connery and Moore - and get a sense of what a good Bond movie should be!

    drEvil Sun Dec 14 2008
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Hey Ho, What a bore! Noisy and confusing from the very start. I read the synopsis beforeI saw the film and still couldn't make any sense of it. There was something about revenging the death of a girl (from Casino Royal), two bond girls, and as usual important plot points were either muttered or buried in noise. I actually fell asleep for a short time in the first half hour, then forced myself to stay awake for the rest only because I'd paid money to be there. . Never (say never) again!

    bob123 Fri Dec 12 2008
    Report
  • THIS IS A BRILLIANT FILM.. YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND PEOPLE THAT CASINO ROYALE WAS THE FIRST BOND ( SO 2 SPEAK) THIS IS JUST FOLLOWING THAT.. SO YES Q IS NOT FULLY ESTABLISHED.... THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BOND AND Q IS IN ITS EARLY STAGE... THIS IS LITERALLY FOLLOWING OF DIRECTLY FROM CASINO.. BOND HAD MADE A DECISION..1)THAT HE WAS GONNA KICK SOME ASS FOR VENGANCE OF HIS LAST LOVE AND 2) THAT HE WAS GONNA BE TOTALY DISATTEACHED FROM FUTURE RELATIONSHIPS... SO THIS FILM IS ABOUT ACTION!!!!! AND RIGHLTY SO.. IM SURE ALL YOURE LOVED GADJETS AND CHEESY ONE LINERS ARE COMING YOURE WAY FOR ALL YOU CRITICS OUT THERE.... THIS BOND IS ( IN MY OPINION... THE BEST!!!!

    paul Fri Dec 12 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • i like supercol. and the rest as he said are a waste of time and supercilious snobs with pseudo linguistic stash

    uk Tue Dec 9 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • OK. Perhaps my last comments were really a review of Casino not having seen QoS. Now I have seen it and there are so many problems with it I do not know where to begin. All the chases are herkey, jerky, shaky stuccato film clips. You can never really see what is going on. This is contrary to the taditional Bond flick replete with detail. And if Craig is gritty, moody, mean & vindictive one can still see a path by which he becomes a cooler if not cold uber-professional agent with a dry, sardonic sense of humor. Even the opening chase, usually one of the best, is almost visually incomprehensible. Certainly they were purloined from the Bourne genre but somehow Bourne's were more believable. The opening graphics were not as bad as I feared, but were definitely not 007 quality. Far too much of Craig shooting his Walther PPK .380; (don't make me go into why that is a problem). We have grown accustomed to the sultry, sexual/sensual and awesome graphical intro to the Bond films. This one was not of the same caliber. Ditto on the theme song. I was fearing worse and it was actually passable relating somewhat to the general theme of the film. The barrel scene was placed at the end of the film. I prefer the beginning but in either case it should be presented with high quality graphics and punctuated with 007 theme song riffs. It was not. Lots of chases. Most are barely watchable. I actually liked the reference to the traditional 13th century Italian Palio horse race in which the riders can use their longer wooden canes to encourage their steeds or discourage their oponents; and the actual event was supposed to be occuring outside of the chase area. The knife fight was lame. How did the baddie die anyhow? Please tell me not with the little pair of cuticle scissors Bond had. And if the death blow was to the only wounded area shown, the left jugular, where did all the blood go as Bond let him 'bleed out'. Not worry the details because we are soon introduced to THE BOND GIRL. Well, a little anti-climatic because she is not quite as attractive as we are used to although she has very pretty lips. The rest of her seems strangely disporportionate for some reason. It's also strange that she would return to the baddie who just tried to have her whacked. That has little probability for success for someone who we later learn is "Bolivian Secret Service". Oh well, not to worry, we are off on another chase, this time with boats. It is perhaps the best done but for the last scene in which the grappling hook is somehow thrown onto the rubber speed boat and flips it from the front of Bond's boat over the top to the rear...... can't quite figure the physics out on that one. Not to worry, we've docked and Bond mysteriously hands the unconscious maiden who he has just rescued over to a dock attendent...what? Well were off to track this baddie and somehow reconnected with the GIRL in Bolvia where we eventually learn that the baddie, Mr. Greene of the evil Greene corporation in conjunction with the even eviler Quantum Criminal Consortiuum LLC has concocted a plot wreaking with the venom of true corporate greed, evil captialism and nefarious financier-ship; to wit, steal all the fresh water in where? Why Bolivia of course and sell it back to them Bolivans at double the price! MUAHHAHAHAHAHA (evil laugh). We learn at a big party that times are tough in Bolvia because it is costing a weeks wages for an average Bolvian to buy a gallon of clean water! As I remember, the average Bolvian earns about $0.25 per day making the water cost about $1.75 a gallon; pretty much on par with market values in Cleveland. Perhaps this is not the best country for our get richer quicker scheme. No matter, we are off to the evil opera where the evil baddies are meeting to plan, well, evil. This is where we reference a modernistic version of the Tosca operatic bloodshed whilst Bond dabbles in the real thing dispatching the body guards of the evil biggies who, now discovered, are making a hasty retreat for the exits faster than attendees at an Al Gore speech. No matter, while in Bolivia we are matroned by the closest thing to a real Bond girl, agent Fields. Unfortunately we never really figure out what is beneath that trenchcoat although it appears that Bond does. Also unfortunately for Fields and us, she is quickly eliminated by the baddies in what can only be termed as a 'crude' theft of the Goldfinger movie. I would have expected more of a mess but why waste camera time on the slickened Fields when you can spend it on bathroom scenes with....who else....M. Perhaps the most difficult what seemed like 15 minutes of the film was watching M in her bathrobe apply & remove cold creme. The threat itself would have sent Mr. Greene into pro bono philanthropy. Not finished with us yet, M draws her bath and the tension in the theater built noticably as we all began to fear that we would be greeted with an au natural scene of her slipping out of the robe into the tub. Fortunately we were spared that experience (wait for the unedited version coming to DVD soon!). However, it just calls into question what fob with a mommy complex of some sort is calling the shots in these films. M continues to demostrate why she should not be "M" vacillating from suspecting Bond to needing him back in 00 some 4-5 times during the movie. We did get a glimpse into the possible personality of M's hubby when he meekly announced, "the calls for you dear on your private line". Whatever. M may welcome Bond back with open arms or have him captured or killed, no matter, the BOND GIRL is rescuing Bond in her getaway car, a 1964 VW Beetle. I guess the Bolivian Secret Service does not get to roll like the 00's in MI6. At least it was a 40HP! No matter. We are now off to a hotel in the middle of a high plains Bolvian desert. Time to charter a plain...no, not the little Beachcraft Bonanza. Choose the DC-3 with a load of cargo on board. Watch out though, you'll get shot down by the Bolvian Air Force in a single engine Cessna. I guess the BAF doesn't get to roll like the 00's at MI6 either. No matter because we are both jumping out of this crate with the only parachute. Somehow everything turns out ok because the chute opens about 20 feet off of our LZ, a nice big soft slab of granite. Its off the the hotel to find the baddies. The hotel, located in the high plains desert of Bolvia, is called the Plaza del Sol. It is completely self-sufficient and powered by...solar....no you idiot, hydrogen fuel cells. In fact, each room appears to have its own hydrogen fuel cell and its accompanying hydrogen supply tank. The maids must make your bed and refill your hydrogen tank when they replace the shampoo in the bath, I guess. Naturally the hotel, located in the high plains Bolvian desert is made substantially of steel & stone. Unfortunately, the steel & stone in Bolvia is not quite as durable as the steel & stone you and I have grown to love as we discover when Bond causes a baddie car to crash through a wall igniting a hydrogen tank. The rest of the hydrogen tanks ignite sequentially. Darn it, I hate when that happens, you just can't get good hydrogen tanks anymore. Again, unfortunately, the Bolvian steel & stone burns more like paper mache. Bond battles the Greene baddie but aborts to rescue the BOND GIRL who is caught up in her own subplot vendetta too trite to be explained here. You would be better off waiting for this to hit DVD. At least then you can slo-mo or replay the chase scenes making sense of them, spend more time with the slick Agent Fields and most importantly, FFW or skip over M's bathroom escapades. You have been warned.

    s Mon Dec 8 2008
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star