Quantum of Solace

Film

Action and adventure

685.x600.film.quantum.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Mon Oct 20 2008

Revenge is a dish best served cold. Which, along with mean and lean, is how Daniel Craig plays 007 in Marc Forster’s slightly disappointing, furiously-paced, hi-tech, slash-and-burn sequel to the more leisurely, luxurious first ‘reboot’, ‘Casino Royale’.

James Bond – you’ll have to remember his Christian name as the arrogant cad neglects to announce it – is grieving the loss of lover and betrayer Vesper Lynd (Eva Green). You’d best remember the plot – and Lynd’s necklace – of the earlier film, too, as director Forster throws us immediately, eye-smackingly into the frenetic activity and globe-traversing travel that is the angry, increasingly unorthodox, ‘soul-destroyed’ world-saving agent’s way of dealing with betrayal, grief and loss.

Eight minutes of highly impressive, parallel-edited, SFX-assisted, stunt-laden action are up before the ears, eyeballs and brain get their first momentary repose. Before then, our hero chases down Mr White in the Aston dodgem-car through Alpine tunnels. Cough or blink and you’ll miss how our bold spooks link the last film’s Le Chiffre to bug-eyed faux environmentalist Dominic Greene (Mathieu Amalric), a destabiliser of US backyard governments with a laughable, pudding-basin haircut-ed sidekick. Almost immediately, he hops, skips and jumps across Siena’s roofs and the horse-loving, harlequin-ed Palio crowds – and we soon follow Bond ‘running wild’ from the palatial villas of Italy to the slums of Haiti, the neo-Reifenstahl opera houses of Vienna, and the menacingly beautiful, otherworldly moonscapes and deserts of Bolivia.

So much dash, flash and thrill – so many boat chases, tight rope-dangling fight scenes, bi-plane dogfights, architectural flourishes and flat-table computer displays – there’s scant time left for character, let alone, story, fun, seduction, humour or wit. You can sense the older, traditionalist viewers wanting to go home early to take their nostalgia pills. True, there are some cute one-liners – presumably the product of Paul Haggis’s polish of Neal Purvis and Robert Wade’s screenplay taken from producer Michael G Wilson’s first inspirational treatment and itself repeatedly pencil-marked by Forster and Craig.

Also, new Bond Woman Olga Kurylenko is impressive as 007’s Latin helpmeet Camille. But, strange for a supposedly ‘humanising’ franchise, Craig’s Bond comes dangerously close to being a cipher himself: only a ‘Bourne’-again, action superhero could perform his physical feats.

It’s a cynical movie, too: half the Brit agents are double and all the US spies seem untrustworthy – save Felix Leiter, of course, whom the excellent Jeffrey Wright reprises in arguably the film’s sole sympathetic, low-key performance. (Though, intriguingly, Judi Dench’s ‘M’ has gone all maternal – couldn’t she be renamed ‘SM’, for Surrogate Mum?) Okay, maybe real life is, pace Hobbes,  brutal, nasty and short – like this movie. But can’t we sneak in the odd moment for some occasional quiet conversation, maybe even a leisurely martini or a game of baccarat, even if we can’t afford luxury rail travel or –  God forbid – some protracted, guiltless sex? Go on, Bond, next time, indulge yourself a little more. We like to watch.
99+

Comments

Add +

Release details

UK release:

Fri Oct 31, 2008

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (139 ratings)
  • The movie is quite hard to get into, you have to concentrate unless you will lose the story plot. Personally, from my opinion, i thought the film wasn't brilliant, but it wasn't rubbish. The special effects were out of this world though!

    Tom Sat Nov 1 2008
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • Saw it. LOVED IT. Action action action. So many people are comparing it with the previous ones! Why? It is a film with a NEW Bond. It is about a Special Agent/Spy called Bond. And so, what is the problem if no Q, no gagdets? I dont want to have a deja vu Bond. If that was the case people wouldnt be too happy saying it is JUST a Bond film. It is more than a Bond Film. It is an action film. Go to see and if you dont like it well...it is not for you. It is a bit like tasting a dish which has been recommended and it is not what you expected either in the good or bad way. Be surprised.

    Bond Sat Nov 1 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Watched it last night and thoroughly enjoyed it-if you read some of the other comments it would put you off-glad I didn't!

    fraser Sat Nov 1 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • craig is an inconsolable bond enraged with vengeance and this is a real solace of a thriller ,consistent and coherent with stupendous action in air land and water,it is darker than dark knight and forster makes nolan look like an action amateur . the movie brings bond to a political maturity it lacked before ,i loved the references to the chinese american dirty games and the plight of the globe with the oil struggle involving the british role. the corruption is so well etched and beaureaucrats shown as cold and callous as snakes ,bond gets to where he has never been before -totally chilling in a harrowing world gone haywire -more dramatic and intelligent than both casino royale and dark knight -as good as the last bourne -will require more than one viewing to appreciate both the intricate conspiracies and the best action i have ever seen -mark forster really makes his mark on the great genre -the exotic but tough locations are superb and the la tosca opera beautifully played in a great piece with great drama -but as they say -la tosca in not for everyone -neither are intelligent efficient purposeful and implicating thrillers

    usman khawaja Sat Nov 1 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • I agree with the comments saying the Bond franchise has lost its soul, in fact I think Craig's bond (despite good acting) is in danger of turning into a robot, mechanically going around killing people (also informing us "I don't have any friends")! As mentioned below the fight sequences are disorientating and irritating and the plot difficult to follow. And what's with the total normalisation of torture in recent cinema? Watching Judy Dench threaten a bound captive with torture was a particularly surreal moment.

    JamesBored Sat Nov 1 2008
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Pathetic film. I'm sorry, I love the Bond Franchise, but this was honestly a waste of both money and time, stop playing with the edits and remember, this is James Bond, not Jason Bourne, ffs.

    Parissa Sat Nov 1 2008
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • I understand that everyone has there own opinion about Quantum of Solace but some of the reviews I've read on this site are ridiculous. OK this film doesn't have a lot of the 'traditional' elements of Bond films but lets be honest times change and if QOS had more sex, gadgets and cheesy one liners then it would be exactly the same as most of the Bond films that have gone before it. I love all the Bond films, without exception. Certainly some are better than others but the way people have dissected QOS and dismissed it I think is totally over the top. I expect that if they were to watch it again and maybe look at the film in the same sort of way as you look at the middle film in a trilogy then they may appreciate it more, this isn't the end of this particular story, this is only the introduction to the Quantum organisation. I can honestly say that after watching for the second time I really do appreciate it far more than when I first saw it!

    Mark Sat Nov 1 2008
    Report
  • rubbish

    callum Sat Nov 1 2008
    Report
  • Its 4.50 in the morning and I'm still trying to nod off to sleep after an interesting night out at the local cinema. You see I went to see the 11pm showing of QOS at my local AMC on its opening night. It was a fantastic atmosphere with groups of lads dressed in pristine tuxedo's who were (like me) itching to see this film. Ok lets break it down. This is not a Bond film as we know it. It is however a Bond film for our times, as were all the others that have proceeded it. Sure enough its not as good a film as Casino Royale, But then again, Dr No is not as good as Goldfinger and The Man with the Golden Gun is not as good as The Spy Who Loved Me and Die Another Day is not as good as Goldeneye. However, all the films named in the previous sentence were all great nights out at the cinema which ever way you look at it. This is a rip roaring rampage of revenge with more humour than Casino Royale and some really touching scenes. My favourite being when Bond travels by plane with Rene Mathis to South America. Bond is drowning his sorrows (while he can between breath taking action scenes) with 4 or 5 Vesper martinis. Daniel Craig plays a restrained slightly squiffy scene that is so touching and shows us that despite his protestations Vesper really got to him in Casino Royale and that the pain of her betrayal and loss is still there beneath the surface whether he likes it or not. Mathieu Almeric is quite sublime as the Bond nemesis in the narrative and his portrayal is restrained and loathsome at the same time. Its nice to see him flex his muscles after his super performance in Speilbergs "MUNICH" and quite simply he plays a completely believable tyrant despite the lack of some kind of satellite based terror weapon. Dominic Greene is an utterly up to date Bond villain with motives and moves that make sense in our day and age. What are those motives? Greed, greed and more greed . . . pure and simple. I absolutely loved QOS, despite the fact that the characters of Rene Mathis and Felix Leiter are woefully under used. Judi Dench as "M" gets more to do in this installment of the Bond series and her performance is a complete tour de force from beginning to end. Anyhow, writing this report has eased me towards sleep and believe me I shall sleep easy in the happy knowledge that James Bond moves ahead with our times with Daniel Craig seriously challenging Sean Connery for the "WHO"S THE BEST BOND" title.

    Garbo Sat Nov 1 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Quantum is not a Bond film. In a very bad way, Bond has gone beyond being smart yet commercial, and therefore is no longer true to the genre it once created. Bond has lost it's soul and sold out to the dumbed down 16 year old naughties audience across the atlantic. Why? Because it makes commercial sense, same way that The Eagles brought in more money than Crosby & Nash. Who was the better act... A couple of things make Quantum the end of the Bond genre we used to know.... 1. Nothing aspirational in the movie whatsoever. If you are looking for escapism from the toils of everyday life...this will not give you your fix. Quite the opposite. Insecure man (Bond) in insecure organization (MI whatever) with insecure management (M), in marginal states (Bolivia) solving trivial problems (water shortage)....More or less reflects the sorry state of a Thames Water worker in central London in 2008. 2. No lovemaking despite two gorgeous women. 3. No gadgets despite being a secret agent. 4. No story-line....Miles wide but an inch deep. Simply put - a bad story. Should have kept it simple as execution of a complex plot is not there. Nothing wrong with a complex plot, but then there needs to be execution. 5. Boats are too small. Will not impress on any self respecting Oligarch. 6. Car is not fast enough. Since when does an Alfa Romeo keep up with an Aston Martin? 7. No flair. Where are the British values of elegance and humor revered by the entire world. 8. No villain that makes you go..."We are in trouble" Short Frenchmen in Hawaii shirts come a dime a dozen (Sarcozy) 9. No "must have" attire that every man would want, and make a girlfriend say "wow".... 10. No location anyone would actually want to travel to on their BA Airmilles. 11. No soundtrack worth speaking about. Music not used to drive emotion, expectation, excitement.... 12. No global threat. Directors have forgotten that "When in doubt....go nuclear"....When in doubt....go black mercedes"....When in doubt....go scary- henchmen"....When in doubt....go Russian" 13. No barrel camera at the end of the intro sequence. 14. No "Bond....James Bond" 15. Bond does not know what he want's to drink. 16. There is no Q. 17. Bond hangs out in a council flat. Not what we would expect from the nations finest. 18. No one-liners 19. Not one camera shot that is steady. Bond has become an MTV music video with too many close up shots with a hand-held camera. No panorama-shots where you can actually admire what is being shot or the scenery (Except for the opening shot across the lake). Having grown up with MTV, and in the comfortable Pullman seats in the Chelsea Cinema, even I found it a headache. 20. Nothing very masculine. At all.... 21. Bad scripting and casting. Characters are not put into context nor built up or torn down. One big mess. 22. No ending! No "Kiss and Fly....." to wrap things up and make us feel that the world is an OK place again. That everything has been set right by our man in the tailored suit. On a positive note, this was the shortest Bond movie in terms of minutes ever made, which is a good thing as it is also one of the worst. Furthermore, Daniel Craig has the potential to be a fantastic Bond (Casino was on the right track), however the team around him needs to change, and that goes more for the people behind the camera than in front. Let's hope the the people in charge go back to the ideas of Ian Fleming, of men in love with women, boys in love with toys, of Britishness, of larger than life bad in this world being stomped out by Saville Row, a drink with an Olive, and a pretty girl with a public school accent....on a mega-yacht, underwater-palace, or in space. Consult Richard Branson, MoD, Ferreti Yachts, Holland & Holland, Harrods, and the people over at American Express Centurion for inspiration.....Their average customer is more Bond than this.....

    more Bourne than Bond Sat Nov 1 2008
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star