Skyfall

Film

Drama

Skyfall.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>4/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Thu Jul 21 2011

‘Were you expecting an exploding pen? We don’t really go in for that anymore.’ That’s Ben Whishaw’s Q to Daniel Craig’s James Bond in ‘Skyfall’ – a Bond movie that boldly struts forward while looking back over its shoulder to the past. That’s what the 007 films are all about – an evolving mix of tradition and progress – and here we have director Sam Mendes (‘American Beauty’, ‘Revolutionary Road’) bringing to the franchise a stately look, sombre mood and ample room to breathe. Saying that, the fiftieth anniversary of the 007 movie project demands the odd knowing wink, to the likes of the classic Aston Martin DB5 from ‘Goldfinger’ and even the crocodiles that Roger Moore hops across in ‘Live and Let Die’.

The Bond films are savvy magpies, smartly pinching the shiniest, newest jewels of moviemaking for themselves. 2008’s ‘Quantum of Solace’ came a cropper by putting its hand too obviously in the till of the ‘Bourne’ films. But ‘Skyfall’ much more subtly takes its cues not only from the current, moodier breed of superhero movies, but also from the world around us. There are nods to terrorism, data theft, hacking and even attention-grabbing government inquiries – but nothing is specific or exact enough to mean anything significant. This is a Bond movie: atmosphere is all. The appearance of contemporary relevance is enough.

The story sees Bond in an emotional crisis after a failed mission to Istanbul leaves the names of secret agents in the hands of an unknown villain. Trips to Shanghai and Macau follow as 007 pulls himself together and tries to find the culprit for Judi Dench’s M and Ralph Fiennes’s Mallory, her Whitehall superior. There’s trouble at home, too, as a bomb explodes in the MI6 building in London and it becomes clear that M is under threat.

Meanwhile, a delicious foe emerges in Silva (Javier Bardem), a camp, creepy and smooth character who dares to challenge Bond’s masculinity in an arresting scene in which his hands run up 007’s legs. But the film’s many commercial sponsors can rest easy: Craig’s harried, stern Bond is as inscrutable and wordless as ever. He has plenty of welcome one-liners (‘I’m just changing carriages,’ he quips, leaping from the roof of one train car to the next), but delivers them like someone cracking gags at a funeral.

‘Skyfall’ is a highly distinctive Bond movie. It has some stunning visual touches: motorbikes racing along the roof of Istanbul’s Grand Bazaar; the neon playing off the precipitous glass of a skyscraper in Shanghai; the Scottish landscapes of its bleak finale. Also, it mostly manages to convince us that there’s something at stake by giving a hint of Bond’s emotional life beyond this story: rooting his crisis in his relationship (or lack of) with his parents, without coming on too heavy-handed or pleading with the psychology.

Mendes knows there’s a risk of coming over po-faced by omitting the traditional pleasures of a Bond movie, and his approach seems calculated to stick to the formula while moving things forward. Still, the role of the Bond girls, played by Naomie Harris as a MI6 colleague and Bérénice Marlohe as a femme fatale, feel token and underwhelming. The tourism element of ‘Skyfall’ – especially the Macau section – is awkward too.

It’s only in the second half of the film, which takes place entirely in the UK, that you get the feeling that Mendes has played the compulsory 007 cards that any Bond director has to. Now he’s properly able to get stuck into a more punchy, more unified mix of action, emotion and story that climaxes in a fittingly isolated and lonely final showdown between Bond and his latest nemesis. 

Critics' choice
98

Comments

Add +

Release details

UK release:

Fri Oct 26 2012

Cinemas showing Skyfall

Filter
  1. Filter

The Scoop At More London

The Queens Walk, London, SE1 2AA Show map/details

  • Address:

    The Scoop At More London The Queens Walk
    London
    SE1 2AA

Map
  • Wed Sep 11:

    • 19:30
Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (72 ratings)
  • Disappointing. Such near-universal critcal praise for what unfortunately is an emotionally non-engaging, beautifully shot but ultimately credibilty-busting (plotwise) luvvie-fest. Compared to Casino Royale and Quantoum of Solace this is the weakest by far. What have the critics been smoking?

    paul m Sun Oct 28 2012
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • In weeks to come when all the hype has died down people will see that this is all like a modern day Emperor has new clothes! This is not the " best Bond ever" by a long mark.It is not Bond at all!. Can we really be expected to believe that the head of MI6 and Bond would plan to entice the super villain to a remote house but forget to take any weapons ?.It was even dull in parts.

    Kevin Sun Oct 28 2012
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Overlong and standard Bourne style action Witty references to previous movies i found tiresome And the panto villain risible But ok for a undemanding watch

    john o sullivan Sun Oct 28 2012
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • ACTION WAS A SUBSTANTIAL PART IN ALL JAMES BONS FILMS' STORY, IN THIS BOND FILM ACTION IS THE STORY. THERE'S NO ROOM LEFT FOR ANYTHING ELSE. VISUALLY IS A BEAUTIFUL FILM BUT IS NOT AN INTERESTING ONE. IT'S JUST A GOOD ACTION VIDEO GAME.

    Alfredo Sat Oct 27 2012
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • An excellent film with the best baddie for a very long time. Deserves to be up there in the top half dozen Bonds and the best of the Craig films. Agree that there is no need for the F word and maybe Wishaw will grow into the Q role. A couple of nice twists / discoveries in the last few minutes top it off. Go see because it is really good though if I was to have any issues it would be that it is probably ten to fifteen minites too long and the girls, other than M, have too little to do. 8 out of ten a solid 4 star film.

    Ian Sat Oct 27 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • Very enjoyable movie, albeit not without some faults, but well worth viewing. Would watch it and enjoy it again no problem. 9 / 10

    K. Flyer Sat Oct 27 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • Correct on LIVE & LET DIE. Minor (Skyfall) gripe, finale 5 min too long plus do we really need "fuck" (abet very muffled) in a 007, but this easily joins the top 1/3 Bonds. The Shanghai & London scenes are top notch and this wizz's by like bullet. As good as promised. 8/10

    scrumpyjack Sat Oct 27 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • Well after all the talk and build up been to see the the new James Bond film. With these type of films they can be hit and miss and as most have seen all the Bond films over the fifty years Happy Anniversary. Will go to see this film a second time because on first showing was a little disappointed did feel it dragged on way to much and i do like long films if the story is there.The build up got a little silly to where they ended up in bonnie Scotland with critics promising a shock ending well my eyebrow stayed firmly in place as i watched a little over acting on the big screen and i still had dry eyes .Do like Chester born Daniel Craig in the role but for this being the best Bond ever not having it and didnt think it was a patch on Casino Royal also too many bad shots from the baddies ( just shoot him ha Austin powers funny).So lots of questions left unanswered right from the start of this film as you will see when watching sometimes keep it simple.Fav Bond film Live and let Die.

    Steve Sat Oct 27 2012
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star