The Edge of Love (15)

Film

Romance

703.film.x600.edge.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>2/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Jun 17 2008

The opening close-up of Keira Knightley’s bright red, heavily digitised lips as she sings on a tube platform at night says it all: war is an escapist fantasy in John Maybury’s claustrophobic, boozy, sensual vision of 1940s London as experienced by Dylan Thomas and the two women in his life. His wife Caitlin (Sienna Miller) and childhood lover Vera (Knightley) are having a lovely war of their own over the self-indulgent but likeable poet (Matthew Rhys): their world is more nylons than NCOs, more alcohol than air raids. Such is Maybury’s focus on their pleasures that their cigarettes sound as if he’s planted microphones in the burning tobacco.

The reality of the Blitz is left to archive as Maybury keeps things personal, depicting alleyways at night, smoky pubs and cramped flats as an intense friendship builds between Caitlin and Vera; Vera meets and marries William (Cillian Murphy), a straight-backed soldier who leaves for service overseas; and Caitlin and Vera buzz around Thomas like ‘Jules et Jim’ after a sex change.

Maybury’s shooting style is dark and angular; the production design, costumes and make-up are all too precious. If only Maybury let a little air out of his film: every window comes with a shaft of light; every mirror catches the camera’s eye. Visually, things lighten up when the trio move to a pair of bungalows in Wales, although the mood becomes more downbeat and destructive when a shell-shocked William returns from Greece to wonder why his wife and friends are living the life of Bacchus with his money. Ultimately, Sharman Macdonald’s screenplay is too muddled, too unfocused – is it about Thomas? is it about Vera and Caitlin? is it about Vera and William’s marriage? – although Maybury’s cinematic invention is never less than imaginative.
12

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

15

UK release:

Fri Jun 20 2008

Duration:

111 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 2/5 (9 ratings)
  • The worst film I have seen in a long time. You can't blame the poor actors who were required to chain-smoke throughout every scene. The indulgence of the script was only matched only by the pretentiousness of the direction. This was an incredibly boring and uninvolving film . . . . I watched it in 10 minute segments over two days . . wondering whether it was ever going to get any better. Sadly it didn't. Particularly nauseous are the attempts to forge a feminist interpretation. One star for the hapless actors whose agents should have advised them to steer clear.

    John Cooper
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • All in all I wished I'd stayed at home. This was a sordid film about selfish, adulterous, shallow people with no real concern for anyone other than themselves.It's one redeeming feature is the photography

    Lucy
    Report
  • Time Out readers should be congratulated for identifying this as a dud. Dialogue was uninteresting eg " we are all innocent in Dylan" - what possible context could justify that rubbish; the tiresome close ups, superfluous songs and bombing scenes, gratuitous nudity and irrelevant poetry readings. The bored look from Mathew Rhys sums up the film entirely.

    atreyu
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • I loved the film and think the accents were alright, apart from perhaps Miller's because she sounded Welsh and English and not alot Irish. He photography was good and the storyline was, in my opinion brilliant. I loved it, five stars all the way.

    Portia
    Report
  • I watched this pretentious, boring, pseudo-artistic rubbish in Cardiff today, and nearly walked out half way through to watch something more absorbing, like the building work. Was Matthew Rhys asked to play it like Richard Burton? Where did Keira find her drippy accent? From watching newsreader Huw Edwards? Sienna's didn't matter, because she covered all bases with English, Irish and Welsh in turn.Why did she call Dylan Dullan sometimes, then Dillan ? The only decent performance was from Cillian Murphy- the only character you could care about. The film being shot in gloomy half light in London, then in rain in Wales ( natch) it was thoroughly depressing. Worst, it was utterly boring. I thought Atonement superb. This was plain awful. Please don't ever let English writers get involved in essentially a Welsh theme ever again. The dialogue was not only banal, it was totally unconvincing in the Welsh context.

    Cynffig
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • I nearly wlked out of this tedious rubbish half way through. Amateurishly made, it was boring beyond, and confirms my long-held belief that \English people should never be allowed to make a film largely about the Welsh. Matthew Rhys was half decent, but played Dylan with a Richard Burton, not Dylan accent.Keira's accent was pure twp Welsh. Think of newsreader Huw Edwards at his worst. Sienna's didnt matter. It veered anyway between English, Irish and Welsh.The one decent performance came from Ciaran Murphy. His was the only character you could care about. As my wife said when a basement London club was bombed, let's hope they were all bumped off.The whole load of tosh was depressingly conducted in seme-light, or else in the pouring rain. It's set in Wales, right? So it has to rain. The dialogue was banal beyond belief. Richard and Judy were reported to have loved it. I'll never read their book recommendations again.

    Cynffig
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • This is a masterful piece of film-making, with many themes simmering and occasionally boiling over in this warts and all study of the poet's bohemian, self-indulgent wartime years that span the aerial bombardments of London and the outward tranquillity of a Welsh coastal retreat - the borderlines between friendship, lust and love, dedication to art and experience versus practical concerns, jealousy, rivalry, cowardice and egotism versus heroism and self-sacrifice and more. A mature, subtle script that suggests and occasionally brings into dramatic focus the underlying tensions is well served by perfect performances (apart from the odd inappropriate smiling that Keira Knightley is prone to, though perhaps under direction this time as the other characters themselves often mention it). But above all the exquisite visual composition of each moment, with inventive and elegant use of close-up, camera angle and lighting, including pointillistic faux home movie footage, is a wonder and joy to behold. It's as continuously beautiful to look at as the Conformist, but the relationships here are more convincing and the narrative more engaging. A very rare type of film these days - it holds the attention and stirs the emotions without abandoning artistic integrity and succumbing to manipulative, superficial shortcuts.

    stowbury
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Disjointed film with several themes running through which were not somehow "connected" up to make a whole. Sienna Miller was the stronger actress. It didn't really hang together and was overall depressing to watch

    Sandra
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • Please don't waste your time or money watching this meaningless and plotless film.

    Granita
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Throughly enjoyed the film and the performances. How you can describe this film as vile is beside me. Its ragged at times but I think as the film progresses this adds to the film. Miller is outstanding and Keira's accent superb. Rhys is frightening at times and intense. All makes for a deep, sometimes poignant and well shot/acted film.

    Matt Lloyd
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star