The Master (15)

Film

Drama

Master, the.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>5/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Mon Sep 3 2012

Paul Thomas Anderson’s ‘The Master’ riffs on the early roots and allure of Scientology with the same compelling strangeness and heady intensity that the American writer-director of ‘Boogie Nights’ and ‘Magnolia’ brought to his last film, ‘There Will Be Blood’. ‘The Master’ is another tale of warped power and fanatical delusions, and it sees Anderson on captivating form as a director who is able to surprise and impress with scene after scene.

Some of the pre-release talk about ‘The Master’ sought to distance its gaze from Scientology, but the film is less equivocal: the organisation depicted here by Anderson may be called The Cause and its leader Lancaster Dodd (played with a frenzied, red-nosed exuberance by Philip Seymour Hoffman), but Dodd is clearly modelled on L Ron Hubbard, from his physical appearance and his eccentric theories to his claims to be a writer, a scientist and much else besides. The parallels are many, and the disguise is so thin as to barely exist.

But you can understand why Anderson didn’t want to get too bogged down in facts. His interest is as much emotional and psychological as historical. He creates a totally beguiling character, Freddie Quell (Joaquin Phoenix), to lead us in and out of Dodd’s bizarre world. We meet Quell at the end of World War II, a disturbed sailor obsessed with drinking and sexual fantasies (images of him and colleagues frolicking on a beach look like a Bruce Weber photo shoot gone rogue). Phoenix plays Quell with an alienating intensity; he’s unpredictable from the first frame to the last.

It’s through Quell that we meet Dodd, an amiable patriarch and leader of a small band of followers afloat on a ship, who takes this unhinged loner under his wing, and applies to him the methodology of The Cause, indulging his troubled mind and propensity for violence. Most of the drama unfolds over a few months in 1950, first on the boat and later at the house of a patron in Philadelphia, although scenes of Quell going through ‘processing’ (an intense form of analysis) inspire flashbacks to earlier days.

‘The Master’ is driven by a spare, jaunty and eccentric score by Radiohead’s Jonny Greenwood. Anderson dominates the rarely-used 65mm format – his close-ups are overwhelming and his longer shots are deep and layered, even seeming 3D-like at their most inventive, with colours and detail brilliantly evoked. Hoffman and Phoenix are at the top of their game, with Phoenix giving a hunched, deranged turn that flits between a childish search for acceptance and a hair-trigger air of violence.

As a depiction of a burgeoning religion, it’s like a portrait of Jesus from the perspective of one of the lesser known disciples: the Gospel According to Quell. We learn that Dodd is a bacchanalian figure, fond of fun and power, prone to extreme anger when challenged and adept at extracting funds and time from his loyal supporters. Anderson asks: why do men such as Dodd and Quell come together? What do they need from each other? How do they sustain each other’s fantasies?

His answers partly lie in a portrait of the needy meeting the powerful. But there are also suggestions of more inscrutable psychological and sexual motives for such alliances. It’s also a commanding portrait of America at a very particular point in time: Anderson may keep his drama close to a few key characters, but he also offers a strong, disturbing sense of a world turned upside down by war and of a chaos that allows the strange new order of The Cause to emerge.

50

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

15

UK release:

Fri Nov 2 2012

Duration:

144 mins

Cinemas showing The Master

Filter
  1. Filter

Search
Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (32 ratings)
  • Fine film, deserving of its awards. Direction is superb,-as is the acting, particularly from Seymour-Hoffman. After being almost suicidal after watching Amour, how refreshing was this film. Recommended viewing.

    Marek Mon Nov 26 2012
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Hee hee! I've just looked up Bradshaw's review.. Perhaps I was channeling his psychic emanations?!

    Numpty Sun Nov 25 2012
    Report
  • busted numpty you're peter bradshaw

    john o sullivan Sun Nov 25 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • If you take a distant defined reference point on the sky-line (such as a tv arial).. close one eye and position your line of site carefully.. prop your head securely.. relax, and extend, extend, your perceptive time scale.. you can JUST about discern the moon's motion- actually SEE it slide across the sky..... . The pace here is of watching a deep river drift by, languid and leisurely, with little whorls and eddies. I found myself progressively drawn in.. mesmerised by the slow drift and swirling patterns.. With 'engaged detachment', if there is such a thing? . Thoughtful, measured, beautiful, grown-up film making. (will sadly be lost on many)

    Numpty Sun Nov 25 2012
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • The film is not so good and was really looking forward to it.Acting superb plot disjointed and unrealistic .Phoenix menacing as freddie but really he looks so ill and disturbed!?Hope he is fine and it was mostly acting he looked over thin and tortured!!!The film seems like a missed opportunity and the plot seemed almost incoherent but I would watch anything with Phoenix in as he is a most compelling actor witha chameleonlike persona

    Carol Sun Nov 25 2012
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Great film making. Those who say there is no progression...?? It's like a dance of death between the two protagonists (the opening image of the roiling wake of a boat is a clue). The fascination is in watching them circle one another. Freddie is attracted yet repelled by this attractive/destructive individual, almost wishing he could believe this nonsense. The fascination of the film is how he hovers near the whirlpool. Will he be drawn in? Will he resist? Will he be changed in some way? Will he be prompted to commit a final act of violence? Had we be given a point of catharsis, the movie would have become something completely different, more glib, less ambiguous, and in my opinion less powerful. If you want to see something plot heavy, watch a thriller, or read a detective novel, if you want a psychological study and to be challenged, try this. (By the way, saw this at a matinee at my local Cineworld. The only person who left was an elderly lady during the cussing and swearing in the prison scene. Heard no negative remarks. Obviously the people of Wandsworth could cope)

    oddingle Sat Nov 24 2012
    Report
  • You may not like the film but it seems to me to be full of pleasures.

    Phil Ince Thu Nov 22 2012
    Report
  • The worst movie ever made, rubbish

    Patrick Thu Nov 22 2012
    Report
  • just not worth the hype, despite great acting and cinematography there is no plot.

    Jack Thu Nov 22 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Anderson has decided to allow character alone to sustain his film and has forfeited the reader's involvement. When the French novelists (and some film makers) of the 50's and 60's tried desperately to overcome the limitations of a narrative driven by character and plot, they attempted, with varying success, to substitute the reader (or viewer) as the source of creative impetus for the text. This meant providing sufficient visual stimulus to provoke the reader's responses, thereby allowing the reader's (viewer's) emotions to participate in the construction of the drama. Anderson has shaped two characters of great promise but whose interaction remains essentially unchanged and unprovocative throughout. As a result the film provides little or no stimulus through which the viewer can engage in the construction of the narrative. The viewer as spectator may work for comic strip film but in the absence of dramatic plot the audience must share in the creation of the film.

    Leon Wed Nov 21 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star