The Master (15)

Film

Drama

Master, the.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>5/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Mon Sep 3 2012

Paul Thomas Anderson’s ‘The Master’ riffs on the early roots and allure of Scientology with the same compelling strangeness and heady intensity that the American writer-director of ‘Boogie Nights’ and ‘Magnolia’ brought to his last film, ‘There Will Be Blood’. ‘The Master’ is another tale of warped power and fanatical delusions, and it sees Anderson on captivating form as a director who is able to surprise and impress with scene after scene.

Some of the pre-release talk about ‘The Master’ sought to distance its gaze from Scientology, but the film is less equivocal: the organisation depicted here by Anderson may be called The Cause and its leader Lancaster Dodd (played with a frenzied, red-nosed exuberance by Philip Seymour Hoffman), but Dodd is clearly modelled on L Ron Hubbard, from his physical appearance and his eccentric theories to his claims to be a writer, a scientist and much else besides. The parallels are many, and the disguise is so thin as to barely exist.

But you can understand why Anderson didn’t want to get too bogged down in facts. His interest is as much emotional and psychological as historical. He creates a totally beguiling character, Freddie Quell (Joaquin Phoenix), to lead us in and out of Dodd’s bizarre world. We meet Quell at the end of World War II, a disturbed sailor obsessed with drinking and sexual fantasies (images of him and colleagues frolicking on a beach look like a Bruce Weber photo shoot gone rogue). Phoenix plays Quell with an alienating intensity; he’s unpredictable from the first frame to the last.

It’s through Quell that we meet Dodd, an amiable patriarch and leader of a small band of followers afloat on a ship, who takes this unhinged loner under his wing, and applies to him the methodology of The Cause, indulging his troubled mind and propensity for violence. Most of the drama unfolds over a few months in 1950, first on the boat and later at the house of a patron in Philadelphia, although scenes of Quell going through ‘processing’ (an intense form of analysis) inspire flashbacks to earlier days.

‘The Master’ is driven by a spare, jaunty and eccentric score by Radiohead’s Jonny Greenwood. Anderson dominates the rarely-used 65mm format – his close-ups are overwhelming and his longer shots are deep and layered, even seeming 3D-like at their most inventive, with colours and detail brilliantly evoked. Hoffman and Phoenix are at the top of their game, with Phoenix giving a hunched, deranged turn that flits between a childish search for acceptance and a hair-trigger air of violence.

As a depiction of a burgeoning religion, it’s like a portrait of Jesus from the perspective of one of the lesser known disciples: the Gospel According to Quell. We learn that Dodd is a bacchanalian figure, fond of fun and power, prone to extreme anger when challenged and adept at extracting funds and time from his loyal supporters. Anderson asks: why do men such as Dodd and Quell come together? What do they need from each other? How do they sustain each other’s fantasies?

His answers partly lie in a portrait of the needy meeting the powerful. But there are also suggestions of more inscrutable psychological and sexual motives for such alliances. It’s also a commanding portrait of America at a very particular point in time: Anderson may keep his drama close to a few key characters, but he also offers a strong, disturbing sense of a world turned upside down by war and of a chaos that allows the strange new order of The Cause to emerge.

50

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

15

UK release:

Fri Nov 2 2012

Duration:

144 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (32 ratings)
  • an interesting portrait of two men both on the borders of madness If only Phoenix could have been cast as Kerouac in "on the road"

    ian Sat Feb 9
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • It's a personal movie about religion made by a person who obviously had zero interest in religion throughout his life which makes it of course feel kind of empty. Another theme going trough the movie is obsession with sex which is in many P.T.A. movies but here it's the ultimate religion. We have a soldier who was parted with his loved one because of the war which scarred him and what he needed was a sense of belonging which this cult gave him and so forth healed him after-which he didn't need them anymore and he could return to his temple of sex. Now to say that PTA went to explore why Master needed him is kind of faulty. Master needed him because he had power over him which made him gloat. I don't think there's much to it.

    Gort Sun Feb 3
    Report
  • Philip Seymour Hoffman will probably go home with his second Oscar (this time in the Best Supporting Actor category) in about three week's time. Joaquin Phoenix was very good as well but I do not think that he can best Daniel Day-Lewis in the Best Actor category this time (Hugh Jackman was very good as well in Lez Miserables as Jean Valjean). I was not really moved by the story in this film but the acting of Philip Seymour Hoffman, Joaquin Phoenix and Amy Adams (she might have to wait for another time for her Oscar which she will most definitely get one day, I think, as Anne Hathaway would simply be unbeatable this time as Fantine in Les Miserables in the Best Supporting Actress category in my humble opinion) had my complete attention from beginning to end.

    DutchFilmFan2013 Sun Feb 3
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • it was ok an average film , sloew going and takign oitself too seruiously

    chris jackson Wed Jan 16
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Technically speaking, it is certainly a good movie, with very strong performances, slick direction and convincing epoch reconstitution. A timely thought-provoking piece too, given the worrying rise of personality cults and self-proclaimed ‘thought leaders’ - leadership seems to be the opium of today’s most aspirational and power hungry segments of the managerial middle classes , Orwell’s 1984 was visionary! - self help / life coaching gurus and proliferating best-selling, sermon-giving popular philosophers indulging in prescriptive sectarian discipline and outright intellectual charlatanism. What a joke. A pity therefore that this movie does not really address, in my opinion, the pseudo-charismatic and absolutely flawed nature of such ‘Masters’, and that one in particular clearly deserved a serious critical treatment! This film seems, on the whole, bizarrely sympathetic to the Cause and strangely generous in portraying its leader and powers… – or is that supposed to be part of the thought-provoking dimension? Let’s assume it is. Interesting that it ends in Great Britain.

    DoigtdePoisson Tue Jan 8
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • Perhaps 'Freddie' was the embodiment of 'Masters' aberrations?

    Glass Mon Dec 31 2012
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • I was looking forward to this movie in the light of so many favourable reviews and my appreciation of both 'Magnolia' and 'There Will Be Blood'. Within 15 minutes both my companion and I realised we'd made a terrible mistake. Notwithstanding that we endured the film's interminable 144 minutes in the hope that things might improve. I kept wondering what else I might be doing. Reading a book perhaps, listening to music or, joy of joys, watching a decent movie. Yes, the film looks terrific. But the lack of engaging characters and a gripping plotline were major failings. Freddie Quell is a badly damaged war vet. Unfortunately he's also one of those people who, in the abstract, you feel sympathy towards. Hower confronted with the reality of his character all you want to do is escape from him. It doesn't help that Phoenix mumbles his way through most of the film. I'm increasingly irritated by films that purport to be in English but would benefit from the presence of subtitles. No such problems afflict Hoffman's Lanacster Dodd, the charismatic charlatan at the heart of the film. Every piece of piffle is audible. The only honest person in the film is the son who cheerfully observes that his father "makes it up as he goes along". Then there are the acolytes, credulous and gullible, willing to believe anything, put up with any indignity and hand over their money in the hope of self--improvement. Top this all off with the most intrusive, oppressive score I've heard in a long time and you have, in my view, the most overrated film of the year and the one I've enjoyed least. It gets one star for the photography.

    Peter Ludbrook Mon Dec 31 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Great film, with fantastic acting all-round.

    sticky Wed Dec 5 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • The best film I've seen this year, in fact in several years. The acting was superb, the cinematography beautiful and the platonic love story of the two main protagonists, Lancaster Dodd and Freddie Quell, was both touching and utterly compelling. I don't know how anybody could have been bored by it. I was enthralled and two hours just flew by. There was nudity, but it certainly wasn;t obscene - unless you consider the naked female form offensive, which I don't. The Master is a wonderful film and I'd highly recommend it for filmgoers who enjoy a challenging and very different movie experience.

    Ambrosia Tue Dec 4 2012
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Awful! Boring, no storyline, or plot. I actually started falling asleep half way through it. I can't believe this got 5 stars!! Simply terrible. You have been warned!

    Eva Sat Dec 1 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star