The White Ribbon (15)

Film

Drama

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>5/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Nov 10 2009

Michael Haneke’s extraordinary new film is a black-and-white ensemble piece set in a north German village on the eve of World War I. It’s a sombre, roving drama that recreates the rituals of a rural Protestant community and imagines the private lives of its householders – the doctor, the baron, the pastor – to show how hierarchical, patriarchal and even feudal such a community may have remained even as the guns were being primed on the Western Front.

It’s a film that’s broader in its focus and less direct in its efforts to shock and tease than 2005’s ‘Hidden’, the Austrian director’s last original film (if you skip his American remake of ‘Funny Games’ in 2007). Yet it also feels like a continuation of a sort of storytelling that he developed further with ‘Hidden’. In that film, the racial guilt of an entire nation was projected through Daniel Auteuil’s hunted Parisian intellectual, and here again Haneke sets a drama in one period to explore issues relating to another. ‘The White Ribbon’, too, is an open-ended mystery about a crime or crimes. However, while in ‘Hidden’ Haneke used the present to ponder its relationship with the past, here he does the opposite, using the past to reflect on that era’s future.

Crucially, ‘The White Ribbon’ is narrated by a man whose elderly voice suggests he’s relating events to us from the perspective of the 1960s or ’70s. In the film, he’s a sympathetic 31-year-old teacher who educates many of the children who creepily roam the village in packs and whom we see subjected to extreme discipline and punishment (and in one case, sexual abuse) at home. The teacher is not from the village, which probably gives him a more objective eye, but he’s present as a series of events occurs: a doctor’s horse is tripped up by a wire; a woman dies in a sawmill; a barn is set ablaze.

Our narrator suggests at the start that what we witness ‘may explain what came later’. Which, of course, this being a German story in 1913, turns the mind to fascism. One looks at the faces of the film’s large cast, especially its children, and wonders what would their relationship be to National Socialism? But to linger too long on such literal questions is an error. This is art, not science, and I don’t think that even Haneke, that most rational of filmmakers, believes one could trace a direct line from his village to the behaviour of a nation two decades later.

What he offers are merely suggestions as to why a people might turn to antisocial behaviour, whether it’s as local as sabotaging cabbages and assaulting a disabled child or as national as following a leader whom you assist in carrying out crimes in your name. I’d hesitate, too, to assume that Haneke is saying something specific about the German national character at this time. Let’s not forget the key role of shame in this film: even the ‘white ribbon’ of the title is a band tied around the arms of naughty children. Let’s not forget, too, that it was partly the shame forced on Germany by the rest of Europe that led to the terrible events of the 1930s and ’40s.

Faithful and striking historical reconstruction is evident throughout. The superb performances also lend a period authenticity to the film. Yet, there’s also something essentially modern about Haneke’s perspective: he peers into closed-off parlours and invades intimate moments (a father lectures a boy on masturbation, a child questions his sister about death) to suggest links between the psychology of domestic regimes and wider societal behaviour – links that few of these characters could have even conceived of in 1913. It’s Haneke’s investigative and quietly accusing contemporary eye that links repression in the home with corruption in the community beyond.

As a thriller, this is much more muted and subtle than ‘Hidden’. The result is that there’s more space for Haneke – and us – to consider the behaviour of his characters and the relationships between them. It’s his least aggressive and most mature film – a masterpiece from a director who is increasingly making a habit of them.
35

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

15

UK release:

Fri Nov 13 2009

Duration:

145 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (25 ratings)
  • An everyday story of country folk, North Germany circa 1914. This film seemed to have elements from “The Crucibleâ€� and “village of the Damnedâ€� with homage to Ingmar Bergman’s early work. It was dour and depressing with the monochrome adding to a dream like non reality. It was a fly on the wall which was neither entertaining or satisfying. It’s conclusions seemingly were that society can be very cruel and can inflict a vengeance on other members of that society who may be different by class or by appearance, which can give rise to ethnic cleansing. The suppressed society was the culprit not individuals.

    Robert Thornton Mon Nov 22 2010
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • so what happend to the midwife, the doctor and their children? Karli died, the midwife killed the doctor and ran off with the doctor's children?

    el Fri Jul 9 2010
    Report
  • thanks, Les. I'll have a look.

    Andrew Sun Apr 18 2010
    Report
  • Andrew, I can´t understand why S&S has omitted the review by HK Miller. However, if you go to rottentomatoes.com and sort reviews by "Rotten" you will find some scathing critiques of Haneke´s film.

    Les Reid Sun Apr 18 2010
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • I still feel the anxiety and desperation of the events as they were evolving. The hypocritical pastor´s abuse of his children. the cruel doctor´s catharsis as he berates the midwife. I was on the verge of leaving the cinema. I several times. The torture was too long.

    Liana Fri Apr 16 2010
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • While I too was frustrated by the lack of resolution (perhaps because we are so tied into the hollywood filmmaking mode that we cannot see beyond it?) there was an element from this film that nobody has mentioned. The accuracy of the manners of the people is spot on. In the countess I heard my grandmother's way of talking and in the strict adherence to form I felt echoes of how mum tried to bring us up. This is really what northern germany was like for many people a century ago.

    chris Tue Apr 13 2010
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Les Reid, can that review by HK Miller be found online? I only found a positive review by Catherine Weatley on the Sight & Sound website. Thanks. Otherwise I agree with the reviewers here who found the film pretentious and unconvincing in its "explanation" of fascism, as well as unengaging as drama. Hidden worked much better in its exposition of colonial and middle class guilt, and had a compelling narrative. Still thought-provoking, though.

    Andrew Mon Apr 12 2010
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • 4 and 5 Stars--NO! As far as story and theme goes, this emperor has no clothes. Pull out that old copy of the "South Pacific" soundtrack and play "You've Got to be Carefully Taught" again for the same lesson in 2 minutes instead of two hours. Great cinematography and period piece, though.

    Jeff Mon Mar 29 2010
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • I did not enjoy this film. The sadistic scenes are ultimately unresolved, and the storyline is inconclusive. The film did not develop, but just rambled on, with WW1 almost as an excuse to end the film.

    SpecialK Mon Feb 22 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • What a dreadful film. The film is disjointed, lacks a coherent purpose, and with no character development the audience is left completely disengaged . At best it's like watching outtakes from a Tarkovsky film, at worst a historical soap opera for a German Calvinist TV channel.

    davout Mon Feb 22 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star