Film

What's on at the cinema plus reviews of the latest movie and DVD releases

Search cinema listings

Browse cinemas A-Z

Search 20,000 reviews

 

Memento (2000)

Director: Christopher Nolan

Average user rating
3 reviews

Movie review

From Time Out Film Guide

Nolan's Following was one of the most original British films of the '90s, and this follow-up makes no compromise. It opens with reverse action: a Polaroid photo fading and sliding into the camera, a corpse returned to life, a gun pulled from the head, a bullet sucked into the barrel. The action thereafter plays forwards as usual - with Leonard Shelby (Pearce) out to track down and take revenge on whoever raped and killed his wife - save that the brief narrative chunks flash ever further backwards in time, so that we share Shelby's confused point of view. He suffers from a rare kind of memory loss whereby, while he remembers life before the murder, he's been unable since then to recall anything for more than a few minutes. Hence he's forever forced to fathom afresh everything he sees and hears. The photos he takes for future reference and words he tattoos into his flesh help, but life remains a mysterious, very risky business. This taut, ingenious thriller displays real interest in how perception and memory shape action, identity and, of course, filmic storytelling. Moreover, a plot strand featuring Stephen Tobolowsky even touches the heart. There's grade A work from all concerned, especially Pearce, but in the end this is Nolan's film. And he delivers, with a vengeance.

Author: GA 0000-00-00 00:00:00

Time Out Film Guide


  • Print this page
  • Send to a friend

User reviews of this film

  • Knuckles5150 said...
    Posted on Jan 19 2009 13:00 Written by Jonathan Nolan, this was the first spectacular film of 2001. I have never had a piece of film noir that left me as refreshingly confused as Memento. Director, Christopher Nolan, steps out of the ordinary even for a noir piece of work. We sit back expecting to view a typical dark and shadowy noir film, but we suddenly find ourselves following the scenes backwards in succession all the way to the “beginning.”
    In this unique style of storytelling, Nolan opens up with Leonard Shelby (Guy Pearce, L.A. Confidential) shaking a Polaroid, in rewind, of a blood splattered wall. The first 2 minutes of the film moving backwards lets on to the idea of the story being told in reverse. Leonard had a career as an insurance investigator, but now puts forth endless effort to a just and noble cause; a quest to avenge his wife’s (Jorja Fox, CSI) rape/murder. Amidst the fiasco, his wife’s assailants struck him with a damaging blow to the head; this left his memory as something to be desired so that he could only remember a few moments into the past. Every time Leonard wakes up, he has to start over again on his pursuit for vengeance. And because of this audacious and chronologically reversed screenplay, we too as the viewer are left trying to piece together this murder/mystery as soon as the last credit fades from the screen in the beginning.
    Mass confusion sets in on Leonard as he wakes up every morning to countless letters, post-its and photos that resemble his unknown past. Each morning he walks past the mirror and each morning he rediscovers a canvas of tattoos covering his entire body (for example: “John G raped and murdered your wife”); these markings tell the story from the time his wife was brutally killed up to the last few confusing moments he remembers.
    Along his epic journey to find justice or any resemblance thereof, Leonard has a couple of people whispering in his ear as to which move to make next. Teddy (Joe Pantoliano, Bad Boys), befriends Leonard in somewhat of a suspicious way with his quick babble and car-salesman like grin. Popping up at the most opportune times, Leonard cautiously accepts Teddy’s self-seeking insights. Natalie (Carrie-Anne Moss, The Matrix) warms up to Leonard quickly because she shares similar dismal circumstances that occurred in her recent past. Sympathetically, Natalie helps Leonard make sense of his scribbled words and the black ink spread across his skin. With Leonard just losing someone, he is very tender and susceptible to the soft touch and kind words of a beautiful woman.
    A little glimpse into the reality of amnesia is demonstrated as Leonard interacts with Burt, the hotel clerk (Mark Boone Junior, Batman Begins), that rents him a room while he is on his venture. Burt adds a small slice of humor to the film, but in the long run we see he is just looking to cash in on Leonard’s defective memory. Leonard soon becomes aware that Burt is charging him to stay in two rooms, but pays him no mind because his dishonesty is obsolete compared to the villain still at large.
    Each time we move ahead to the scene chronologically before the one we’ve just seen, we see Leonard become more and more amateurish in his ability to decipher truth. We can only play detective throughout the film and piece together bits to the puzzle as to, not who, but why all this is happening. A streaming black and white prologue plays throughout the film in-between each scene that helps us understand the where, what and how.
    There is nothing I can pick out of this film that would deter any person that claims to be a movie buff. Watching this movie is a rare treat; you are able to see a never-done-before way of putting the layers together of an already well written script. You will see the story fold itself back up and force you to put together the people’s intentions, the forgotten places and the foreshadowed events as they are taken out of the movie. I would suspect that this movie isn’t for everyone; some will lose interest quickly because of being forced to analyze the complicated format. But for those of us who are looking for a new and innovative way to view film, Memento satisfies that itch to be mentally challenged and does all but surpass perfection.
    Report as inappropriate
  • Magmabulle said...
    Posted on Jun 08 2008 21:43 Almost too intelligent, but completely unforgettable.
    Report as inappropriate
  • Technoguy said...
    Posted on Apr 06 2008 17:35 MEMENTO
    This is film as cross-word puzzle. Pierce delivers a strong central performance as Shelby,but the real star is in the cutting technique,the film editing,the direction and the story.The central character has a ‘condition’.Also a condition of watching this film is that the story is told backwards,in small scenes of about 15 minutes a piece.This develops in the viewer a schizophrenic state. Kierkegaard said we live life forward
    but only understand it retrospectively. In the plot Shelby has short term memory loss from a traumatic attack where his wife had been raped and killed.He searches for the killer. The film moves from back to front.It
    starts with Shelby killing who he believes is the culprit John G. Then it moves back in time to the wife’s murder. He develops a ‘system’: notes
    of paper,tattoos on his body,polaroids of people and places to build up a
    ‘fact’ file with written text added later. Shelby’s condition is a lack of
    short term memory.He retains long term memories so he can drive a car,
    he knows his wife will not come back,he also knows certain things for sure e.g. the feeling of an object he picks up.There is also the use by Nolan of flash back up to the moment of the wife’s murder and beyond, when Shelby’s wife was still alive.With his adherence to ‘facts’ which he pins down through his system of notes,polaroids and tattoos he avoids the
    unreliability of memory and does not go on recommendations, he utilizes
    instinct to manoeuvre himself through the impasse of non reflection. He has to make on the spot judgements from observations on the hoof. He says just because he doesn’t remember doesn’t mean his actions are
    meaningless.
    He knows who he was but not who he is now. He was an insurance investigator working on claims. This part of the film is cleverly done in
    black and white.He recalls ‘Sammy’ one of his client claimants who had a similar memory problem and uses his story to understand his own. Sammy could only remember things for 2 minutes and has such a short attention span following his own accident.He could still do complex things like his wife’s insulin shots because learned before the accident.He
    is given tests and with the idea of repetition is given conditioning to see if he could learn through instinct not memory.Sammy does not respond which suggests his condition is psychological not physical. This does not mean Sammy was faking it but it does mean his claim was turned down as he wasn’t covered for mental illness. His wife at her wit’s end having to pay for medical bills tests him fatally for herself asking him three times
    consecutively to give her her shot of insulin. She ends up in a coma and dies and Sammy ends up in a nursing home.
    The loud and brash character of Teddy is a private investigator who Shelby asks for help.He knows he is looking for the culprit John G. Teddy seems a little too fond of getting him to change his I.D. as he says a cop is after him. Shelby writes him down as a lier. Later on writing down to kill him. A hotel proprietor exploits his memory loss charging him for 2 different rooms. Also Natalie a bar worker(Carrie Ann Moss) is a femme fatale he meets who he sleeps with and helps with her abusive drug-running partner and she passes on the license plate no. of John G.
    Shelby uses his practise as an investigator to find the truth: learning to look in people’s eyes and study their body language.
    This is an existential thriller whose hero doesn’t know how he got here or what he’s done or who he is.The fact that it is able to ask such questions as ‘Does the world exist outside of our minds?’ is no mean feat.This character has to heal ,bereave,but can’t as he can’t feel ‘time’. I’d like to modify the intellectual pleasure of the conundrum by saying it’s hard to
    feel life moving backwards or to feel anything for the character but still
    admire the director’s attempt to do something different.
    Report as inappropriate

What do you think?
Post your review now

clear rating
Min 1 star. Zero stars will be treated as unrated.

*mandatory fields





Top Stories

Stephen Poliakoff discusses 'Glorious 39'

Stephen Poliakoff discusses 'Glorious 39'

Stephen Poliakoff’s ‘Glorious 39’ is his first film for cinema since ‘Food of Love’ in 1997. Dave Calhoun met him

Is 'Paranormal Activity' the new 'Blair Witch'?

Is 'Paranormal Activity' the new 'Blair Witch'?

How does a film go from DIY experiment to box-office smash? 'Paranormal Activity' director Oren Peli explains

Steven Soderbergh on 'The Informant!' and 'The Girlfriend Experience'

Steven Soderbergh on 'The Informant!' and 'The Girlfriend Experience'

We talk to Steven Soderbergh about his two forthcoming films: one featuring a porn star, the other a chubby Matt Damon

A gateway to all things 'New Moon'

A gateway to all things 'New Moon'

In anticipation of 'The Twilight Saga: New Moon', Time Out is offering the chance to pick up a limited edition pack with three exclusive magazines and a free poster.

London Children's Film Festival

London Children's Film Festival

Read our exclusive reviews of films playing at the 2009 London Children’s Film Festival

The films that deserve a TV spin-off

The films that deserve a TV spin-off

With Roland Emmerich suggesting he'd like to make a '2012' TV spin-off, we propose some more movie-to-TV serialisations

The Coen brothers discuss 'A Serious Man'

The Coen brothers discuss 'A Serious Man'

Masters of contrary comedy, Joel and Ethan Coen have struck gold again with their latest, ‘A Serious Man’

Michael Haneke discusses 'The White Ribbon'

Michael Haneke discusses 'The White Ribbon'

Dave Calhoun met with Michael Haneke in Munich to mull over the details of his Palme d'Or winner, 'The White Ribbon'

Ten inspirations behind 'Avatar'?

Ten inspirations behind 'Avatar'?

Time Out ponders the influences behind James Cameron's anticipated space-opera on the basis of the trailer

Time Out's 50 greatest animated films with commentary by Terry Gilliam

Time Out's 50 greatest animated films with commentary by Terry Gilliam

In celebration of the release of Pixar's 'Up' and Wes Anderson's 'Fantastic Mr Fox', read our rundown of fifty classic feature length animations