Film

What's on at the cinema plus reviews of the latest movie and DVD releases

Across the Universe (2007)

Director: Julie Taymor

Time Out rating

Average user rating

15 reviews

Movie review

From Time Out London

Quite a trip this new musical from celebrated Broadway director Julie ‘The Lion King’ Taymor, and of the sort you might experience if you locked yourself in a room, mixed LSD with domestic bleach and put your entire Beatles collection on shuffle on your iPod while two televisions simultaneously played Milos Forman’s ‘Hair’ and some old episodes of ‘Bread’. What Taymor has done, along with former ‘Porridge’ writers Dick Clement and Ian La Frenais, is take a bunch of Beatles songs and spin a narrative around them which is set in Liverpool and the US in the late ’60s and which takes its prompts from those same songs’ lyrics, characters and themes. The result is a weird, loud and colourful mix of the literal and the lateral that is often so embarrassing to watch that you’ll be checking over your shoulder to check that no one’s looking.

Jude (Jim Sturgess) is a good-looking Liverpool lad who’s bored of his job in the docks and hops on the boat to America, where he hooks up with Princeton drop-out Max (Joe Anderson) and falls for Max’s sister, Lucy (Evan Rachel Wood). This being 1968, the wind of change soon blows over them all and Max is sent to Vietnam, Jude struggles as a painter in Greenwich Village and Lucy joins a protest group that morphs into the Weather Underground. Again and again, spirited singing bursts out of banal dramatic sequences, and you’ll be chewing your fist at the dialogue: ‘Where did she come from?’ ‘She came in through the bathroom window?’ God help us. Taymor has mistaken a deeply clichéd view of the late ’60s for a radical slice of the zeitgeist. Let it be.

Author: Dave Calhoun

Time Out London Issue 1936: September 26-October 2 2007

Email Tweet Share

User reviews of this film

Louise said...

Posted on Apr 28 2010 23:30 Oh! I am late. I did not see the film when it came out because of critics such featured on this site. I should not have listened. I just saw the movie last week on a dvd. I was yougn in the 60's, I was political and I liked the Beatles. This movie is a truly enjoyable trip to this period. It was not meant to be a deep socio-political analysis but it gives an accurate picture of the many currents that coexisted during that wonderful and also tragic time. All the young people I showed it too also loved it and found it very informative. And a very good cast.

Report as inappropriate
MCKayla said...

Posted on Nov 28 2009 22:52 I wasn't alive during this period in America's history, but I do know that this is a great movie. I don't think this movie was supposed to show everyone's experience during that time period, if it had it probably wouldn't have been the exciting and colorful film it was. But I do think that it showed bits and peices of peoples' experiences during the time. I thought that this movie was one of the best and most original(yes, I know the songs aren't original) movies in a long time. I think it was really well made and I loved how they took songs that were made 40 years ago and made them fit this plot perfectly. I think the actors were very talented and the script was well crafted. I like how they put their own spin on Beatles songs. Yes. they might not fit your interpretation of the songs but they don't have to. That's the purpose of art, for you to take your own meaning out of it. I understand everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but I think that if you didn't enjoy it you might have been looking for more than the movie was made to offer. I recommend any Beatles fan and anyone looking for a great, original movie to watch this.

Report as inappropriate
molllycurry said...

Posted on Oct 28 2009 18:15 everyone's entitled to their own opinions , however I think this movie is a wonderful display of art and history . the music is re-done in a way that's original , and doesn't slaughter the orginallity of the beatles songs . I don't understand where prudance comes from and what she has to do with the whole story line? but other than that I think the movie is different and fun .

Report as inappropriate
James said...

Posted on Oct 18 2009 07:46 How old I wonder are the people claiming this to be an accurate representation of the zeitgeist of the late '60's? If you remember it ,they say,then you weren't there. Well.... I was there and I was of an age to remember (if not always totally focused on the bigger picture!) This movie is not there; Not remotely representative of the momentous events that shaped the world for decades to come. Vietnam is treated as an apocolypse now cinematic backdrop without any attempt to shuffle the glimpse into the ditch of meaning; The lyrical hymn to understanding,tolerance and patience 'Let it Be' is used as the soundtrack to a race riot and the comment on Chinas cultural revolution under Chairman Mao Tse Tung encapsulated in the track 'Revolution' is used as a powerful and distorted piece of propaganda against the anti-war movement. Again and again the spirit of the Beatles and the age they bestrode is traduced, betrayed and misinterpreted. The whole film is located in America for heavens sake! The quintessentially British contribution to Popular Music and an entire generation which looked to these shores for its musical inspiration gets played out in the colleges of Princeton,the streets of New York and the campus of Columbia University; No room for Penny Lane Eleanor Rigby or Lovely Rita. Liverpool only rates a mention at the Shipyard Gates and the Tenement Alleys; All is doom laden and grey and devoid of life or hope.In America however, there is life and colour and passion; Art and the vivid life of the imagination peopled with beautiful and interesting characters who have caught hold of Life by its coat-tails and are along for the ride of their lives. Oh please! Come on! What a piece of pure revisionist nonsense this movie is! Finally, as one who did witness these events at first hand, I have to deplore an attempt at historical paraphrase which prefers to cite the explosion of a home made bomb in Greenwich Village, only ever intended to be used for effect and not to kill or maim, to the monumental events at Kent State University in Ohio where four students attending an anti Vietnam demonstration were shot to death by National Guardsmen. This event reverberated around the world and along with courageous and explicit Journalism from Vietnam which showed the full horror of Americas policy in that God-forsaken corner of South East Asia,helped fill the minds of the free-thinking world with revulsion for this doomed military intervention. This director should be ashamed at her name appearing on this deeply flawed attempt at an evocation of some of the most pivotal years of post-war cultural and political history. Please Ms. Director, take this away and re-do attempting, along with correcting the aforementioned poilitical inaccuracy, to allow the wonderful Beatles songs to breathe and not shoe-horn them laboriously into a convoluted and unbelievable plot led by an unsympathetic scouser with about as much charm as one of the Gallagher brothers.

Report as inappropriate
Sam said...

Posted on Jun 05 2009 23:34 I thought it was an excellent film, with extraordinary vocalists. I guess it just wasn't the perfect cup of tea for all of us...

Report as inappropriate
Rusty said...

Posted on May 18 2008 17:49 What a gorgeous, well crafted and fun film. Sorry guys who panned it but think you are wrong on this one. Best film in ages.

Report as inappropriate
Linds said...

Posted on May 06 2008 13:57 All who say this was horrible are seriously insane. This movie shows the harsh reality of drafts and war. How families deal with having a loved on in the war. Showing that our voices arent really heard and cared about. The music is amazing. It shows the difference between urban and suburban life. You need to look deeper into the story and what its showing. I loved this film but then again maybe its because i could relate to it with having a bunch of people in the Iraq war. Think about it. This movie is a movie i could watch over and over and over again.

Report as inappropriate
jefferson said...

Posted on Feb 03 2008 02:39 I am incredibly musical-phobic, but the brave brilliance of this film in general, and many scenes in particular, will stay with me for a long time. Beautiful, moving, and unique imagery combined with (usually) supurb music make this one of my year favorites. Yes, it does cheese out at times, there are a couple scenes that weigh the rest of the film down, and the historical myth that it weaves bears some scrutiny. So I understand that some people may be turned off by the film. I would suggest though that most of those with a light heart will appreciate the contribution this film has made to the craft.

Report as inappropriate
shen said...

Posted on Oct 27 2007 20:15 A movie that go straight to semplicity and the magic of the human heart. The story is not original or try to tell some deep meaning, is just fresh upbeat and celebrate people, ideals and life. Intodays society where people have become increasingly like machines and relationships have lost integrity and magic a movie like that serve as a reminder that not long ago we use to dream big and enjoy each other with very little things. The Beatles song are remarkably reinterpreted in a very creative manner. Visually the movie is very engaging creating a fairy tale like flavour. The only 2 reasons you might not enjoy this film are if you comsider the Beatles untouchable or if you are a cynic, in other words sad single minded people. I can honestly say this is a movie I can watch time and time again and fully enjoy its semplicity and warmth. I wish more uplifting movies were made.

Report as inappropriate
Greg said...

Posted on Oct 13 2007 20:05 Agreed. The film constantly indulged itself in artistic cliches, and seems to be taking advantage of the Beatles' music, instead of paying homage to it. The plot was predictable and slow, and some of the singing was just awful- also, the "surreal" elements were more awkward than mystifying.

Report as inappropriate
Chris said...

Posted on Oct 09 2007 15:59 Your review has verified the fact that each viewer goes to see a film with his/her own agenda.
I enjoyed the "feel good factor" at the end having wanted to sing all through the movie. Can't wait for the DVD to have a complete sing-along evening.
Jim Sturgess is gorgeous as well as being multi talented. Look forward to seeing him again soon.

Report as inappropriate
gigi said...

Posted on Oct 05 2007 19:28 I agree, the movie was a waste of my time and $.

Report as inappropriate
LEN said...

Posted on Oct 04 2007 12:11 I disagree with you, it's GREAT. I put on a on a par with SHOWBOAT & SOUTH PACIFIC but then some people call me an old fogy. It has the basic formula for a good film i.e. boy meets girl - boy loses girl - boy finds girl again. Tear in the eye at the end and ALL THAT BEATLES MUSIC.

Report as inappropriate
Liam said...

Posted on Oct 03 2007 16:47 I really support what you say, and I wish you had gone farther. This film overlooks most of the meaning behind the Beatle's lyrics, and the movement they inspired to bring a trite and overdone boy meets girl/boy loses girl story. After leaving the theatre I appealed to John Lennon, saying that I'm sorry his music has been turned into a film that encapsulates everything that is shallow and masturbatory about musicals. I would be happier to see a movie with a plot that took some effort to dream up, and music that paid tribute to the revolutionary sound of the beatles. Instead, we were given a hum-drum plot, and bad acting sacrificed for voices that sound just like anyone else. Let's all say it together, Sorry John.

Report as inappropriate
Michelle said...

Posted on Oct 02 2007 22:21 I can't agree with you on this, and in fact, think you must be a tired cynic to dislike this film. I found it a kick, and a great representation of the time period. Well done Miss Taymor and terrific cast!

Report as inappropriate