Film

What's on at the cinema plus reviews of the latest movie and DVD releases

Star Trek (2009)

Director: JJ Abrams

Time Out rating

Average user rating

94 reviews

Synopsis

The original crew of the USS Enterprise battle Romulans from the future in the eleventh Star Trek film. J.J. Abrams (Lost, Cloverfield) directs and we follow James T. Kirk from his first day enrolling at the Starfleet Academy.

Movie review

From Time Out London

Cheerfully bucking the trend for dark, miserablist blockbusters, ‘Lost’ creator JJ Abrams has updated the ‘Star Trek’ franchise for the twenty-first century without resorting to political allegory, moral wrangling or the sadistic violence that characterised similar reinventions like ‘The Dark Knight’. It’s true that an entire planet gets blown up, but the characters swiftly recover on their way to another round of phaser-firing, evasive-manouevring, quip-trading action.

The script details the early years of captain-to-be James T Kirk (Chris Pine) and his taciturn Vulcan sidekick Spock (Zachary Quinto) and is deceptively clever: it works both as affectionate fanboy nostalgia and as a neophyte’s introduction to the ‘Trek’-verse. By employing a time-distorting narrative, complete with mind-mangling multi-dimensional techspeak, Abrams and his writers allow themselves to refit this fictional future completely, keeping the good stuff (beaming up, warp drives, that inimitable ship design) while jettisoning most of the increasingly convoluted mythology.

It doesn’t all work: Eric Bana’s Romulan villain feels too familiar, just another plasticine-headed psychopath with a grudge against the universe. The climax, too, is undercooked: ten minutes of noisy ship-to-ship combat with very little emotional investment.

But these are minor complaints when stacked against Abrams’s many successes. The flawless design wittily updates the ’60s series’ sleek art deco interiors and throws in a few Lycra miniskirts for good measure. The cast are equally strong: Quinto brings wry charm to an otherwise calculating character, while Pine powers through his performance in bullish, if not quite Shatner-esque fashion. The only sore thumb is Karl Urban’s McCoy, whose ‘Damn it, Jim!’ impersonation feels a little too close to pastiche.

The overall impression is one of unbridled enthusiasm on the part of the film’s makers, both for its predecessors and for the brave new universe Abrams and his crew are exploring. Perhaps the best summary of the film comes from Captain Kirk himself, dying on the side of a distant interstellar rock many decades later: ‘It was… fun.’

Author: Tom Huddleston

Time Out London Issue 2020, May 7-13, 2009

Email Tweet Share

User reviews of this film

J.C. Byrd said...

Posted on Feb 14 2011 01:38 Oh that's to bad for you "Kazuma" because JJ Abrams is planning shoot the next Star Trek sequel in the August and to be release sometime in summer 2012... checkout the latest news at "trekmovie.com". Awesome!

Report as inappropriate
Kazuma 1176 said...

Posted on Feb 08 2011 23:15 JJ Abrams must never be allowed to touch another Star Trek movie. The bad guy was a terrible actor, his ship was ridiculously large, like flying a high school gym around, the story line was crap, Old Spock and New Spock meeting? Forget about tearing the fabric of time, the inside of the Enterprise looked like an old refinery, not 25th century at all, and the constant flashing of lights in lens and jiggling the camera for effects was great in high school movies, but completely killed the visuals for me. I for one will never pay to see a JJ Abrams movie again!!!!!

Report as inappropriate
Rob Allen said...

Posted on Oct 15 2009 23:14 Sensational a worthy addition to the series of films. If you consider the rubbish that was Star Trek 4 & 5 this is leaps and bounds above them. Great casting in the roles though Checkov is a bit OTT with his accent

Report as inappropriate
cwm said...

Posted on Jul 18 2009 20:21 There are hundreds of ways Abrams could have gotten it wrong, ruining (for the devoted fans) rather than reviving the fading franchise. Give him credit: he got almost everything right!
Hard to follow action scenes with too many jump cuts; a disconcerting fondness for faux lens flares and (just before a smash cut) fading to white. But after the invigorating experience of viewing this film, I feel reluctant to mention what seem like trifling complaints.

Report as inappropriate
Rachel Marta said...

Posted on Jul 03 2009 02:31 I believe I am one of the oldest Trekkie's writing here. I am 65 years old and saw the very first episode of TOS the first time it was on TV. I have seen the movie 15 times and it is still playing in my neighborhood theatre July 4th weekend in Massachusetts. This movie is amazing. Forget the holes in the story; just remember the gorgeous new young vibrant cast, the increditble music, sets, special effects and sound effects. And this is the first time it was filmed with realistic looking shuttles (with some dents). For those who wonder how cadet Kirk could go to Captain Kirk in such a short time, remember how many ships were wiped out at Vulcan. They had to replace a number of captains quickly. And our hereo proved himself to be a team player who grew up fast once the responsibility was on his shoulders. I adored Chris Pine as Kirk. He showed many different facets to the Kirk character - smug, cocky, funny, sexy, energetic and gorgeous in a rugged way. Don't get me wrong, I love the way Shatner created his Jim Kirk. He made TOS. But we are now in an alternate time line, Kirk has grown up without a father, Spock has lost his mother and his world - and we have many new story lines ahead of us for future movies. I have been rejuvenated - as Kirk said in TWofK "I feel young" - again.

Report as inappropriate
Ishan said...

Posted on Jun 28 2009 11:03 Fascinating!

Report as inappropriate
Dan P said...

Posted on Jun 27 2009 04:37 This was the best movie I've ever seen. I believed the sincereity and motivation of the characters. I cared about them within the first 2 minutes of the movie. I was truley entertained and thought it was well worth the money.

Report as inappropriate
Jason E said...

Posted on Jun 22 2009 15:57 Jim, you saw this film 6 times? I can only assume that you were testing your limits of torture and 6 was the limit.

Report as inappropriate
JIM said...

Posted on Jun 22 2009 10:34 A VERY GOOD update of the Origional. Been to see it 6 times so far. Chris Pine is defo A YOUNG JAMES KIRK. QUINTO IS GOOD TOO. Simon Pegg was not too bad either. THIS IS AWSOME.

Report as inappropriate
steven matthews said...

Posted on Jun 20 2009 23:57 thank you fery much j.c. byrd your comment is appreciated

Report as inappropriate
J.C. Byrd said...

Posted on Jun 17 2009 22:35 Excellent film, it was worth watching hope to see more in the future and BTW well said steven matthews about matty uk boring message lol...

Report as inappropriate
Chris said...

Posted on Jun 17 2009 18:02 There were some good effects and scenes in this film, but the actors were just far too annoying for me to give this film a decent rating, maybe it deserves a Three star rating but i cant give it more than Two as a result... Although it was nice to see the Old Spock and hear the old music and narration at the end! Is the russian kid really russian btw? Man that accent sounded so fake and annoying! Spock and his love interest were annoying, the guy who plays young spock irritates me, he was annoying enough in 24....

Report as inappropriate
Kinglouie said...

Posted on Jun 17 2009 10:48 clever, funny & down right brilliant. All the old favourites with a twist. The story is so clever that they can now start the the old Kirk, Spock & Bones startrek from scratch. It will keep us original Startrek fans & new fans coming back time & time again. I loved it.

Report as inappropriate
Tom said...

Posted on Jun 15 2009 15:37 This film was clearly written for 10 year olds. Captain Kirk, 18 year old rebel goes from surly cadet to Captain of the federations flagship within the space of 2 hours. The pilot of the starship is 17 years old, and generally the whole film is a laughable parody of the quality star ship films with Jean Luc Picard and William Shatner. Where do I get my money back - this plot was written by a 9 year old. Hopefully the producer and the actors have gone where no man has gone before, and are not planning on coming back

Report as inappropriate
Jason E said...

Posted on Jun 12 2009 01:01 This film was OK. Not great, but not altogether awful. I hear a lot of high praises for this film which I believe is more to do with Mr J.J. Abrams current a la mode status amongst the media elite. I am amazed at the amount of successful producers, writers and actors who think that they can turn their hand at film-directing. Each of these disciplines requires a different set of skills, and as such the mind-set of the individual is also completely different. A good example of these two approaches is comparing Abrams’ Mission Impossible 3 to De Palma’s Mission Impossible. In my opinion the De Palma film is by far superior, purely from a directing perspective. Abrams, coming from a producer’s background is a numbers man, and a very good number’s man he is, and as such his attempt at directing Mission Impossible 3 are clunky and pedestrian. De Palma on the other hand is a true creative and visionary and turns David Koep and Robert Towne’s screenplay into an expertly crafted film. For the mammoth undertaking of making a new revamped Star Trek film, you need a dedicated film director, someone who has studied the craft of film-making and has a proven track record as a film director. You also, and this is essential, need a director who is a fan of the Star Trek franchise, unlike Abrams, who, by his own admission, has stated that he has not been a true Star Trek fan. I tend to think that the mark of a successful film is not how much money is generated at the box office, but rather how many times over the years you can watch it over and over again and still find it entertaining. In my opinion the new Star Trek film will not survive the test of time, and is certainly not a film that will enjoy repeat viewing. It is rather dull and confusing and lacks that magical quality found in some of the earlier Star Trek films. Most notable of these films is Star Trek: First Contact. I have seen this film on countless occasions over the years and it never fails to be entertaining and thoroughly engrossing. Rather perversely, I watched the Phantom Menace the other day and was rather surprised to find that I was mildly entertained.

Report as inappropriate