Film

What's on at the cinema plus reviews of the latest movie and DVD releases


Quiet Chaos (2008)

Director: Antonello Grimaldi

Time Out rating

Average user rating
5 reviews

Movie review

From Time Out London

As well as writing, directing and appearing in his own work, Italian filmmaker Nanni Moretti sometimes acts for others, as is the case in this moving adaptation of a novel about a widowed father, which was a hit in Italy. Moretti, an endearing and humane presence, is Pietro, a businessman with the relaxed demeanour that only serious wealth allows. We meet him on a beach, playing ball with his laidback brother Carlo (Alessandro Gassman), before both are forced to dive into the sea to rescue a pair of women. One tragedy averted, another emerges: Pietro arrives back at his holiday home to find his ten-year-old daughter Claudia (Blu Yoshimi) in a state: her mother – his wife – has fallen and died.

The first few minutes threaten a weepie along the lines of Moretti’s ‘The Son’s Room’, but what unfolds involves a strange conceit that suggests a lower-budget American studio film seeking indie kudos: Pietro returns Claudia to school and proceeds to run his life from a nearby bench, honouring a promise that he’ll never stray far. He strikes up habits and acquaintances: there’s the blonde with the dog; the woman with a Down’s syndrome son who expects him to flash his lights; the guy that runs the local trattoria… Meanwhile, all sorts of shenanigans are unfolding at the office, culminating in a brief visit to the bench by a Richard Branson-type uber-exec played by a director whose identity I won’t reveal.

The film has flaws – not least an awkward use of songs by Radiohead, Rufus Wainwright and Stars – but it’s a thoughtful portrait of the purgatory of grief that prefers small incidences and exchanges over grand gestures of sentiment and revelation. It’s sad – but never cloying.

Author: Dave Calhoun

Time Out London Issue 1992: October 23-29, 2008


User reviews of this film

  • Mother Jones said...
    Posted on Apr 18 2010 21:47 Do not know whether this film was any good or not; the subtitles were so inadequate, and I have some Italian. They were not only too sparse but sometimes tailed off in the middle of a sentence. I could tell that this was because what one needed to know appeared again, subtitled, in a few minutes, but you don't know that when a sentence doesn't end, do you?
    Report as inappropriate
  • Armadillo said...
    Posted on Oct 14 2009 22:04 There is something I have to get off my chest. I did not like this movie.
    The plot seemed weak, the characters shallow - the neurotic sister-in-law made me cringe; the little girl was great though.
    The main character I didn't find very endearing and the billed poignancy and profundity did not appear. There is nothing remarkable or moving about a man, a father, looking after his child after the death of a parent, unless you count ability to read bedtime stories, take time off work and do the school run. Sitting in a park might have led to a to more interesting cameos besides a good-looking blonde giving you the eye. It's a real pity we didn't have any view of his wife, and hence the ability to empathise with his grief. He didn't seemed to know, or like her particularly.
    Like some others reviewers, I concur that the sex scene is horribly irrelevant and gratuitous. Why put such a shocking scene of misogynistic, angry sex into a storyline about a man supposedly being kind, gentle, vulnerable, caring and loving? It provided a complete juxtaposition. Hard to watch. Harder to justify.
    I read in the closing credits that Roman Polanski was an “artistic advisor” – the guy who seduces 13 year old girls. Nice.
    I really wanted to like this movie, on my fiancee's recommendation. Could have really done with a feel-good movie and a tale of redemption and hope. Instead I was left reeling from something I did not expect to see, and safe to say it ruined my night.
    Don't bother!
    Report as inappropriate
  • Sabrina Ma said...
    Posted on Feb 05 2009 00:45 The sex scene is not gratuitous, and is (as I read from other reviews) a substantial part of the original book. Perhaps one can argue that the graphic sex is also a reflection of Pietro's subdued, but violent, reaction to the loss of his wife? (The woman is this sex scene is the one Pietro saved from drowning).
    Report as inappropriate
  • Pam said...
    Posted on Nov 14 2008 13:17 I was really enjoying this film As usual Nanni Moretti made acting look effortless. Then the director, for reasons I will never understand, chose to insert a gratuitous sex scene, which I found completely out of context and quite hard to watch. I'm not a prude, it just didn't fit with with the mood of the film. Shame, really.
    Still worth seeing for the rest of the film, though.
    Report as inappropriate
  • geri davies said...
    Posted on Oct 25 2008 18:38 Good script, a really clever adaptation from an excellent book. Good performances all around, look out for a surprise cameo at the end.
    Report as inappropriate
5 comments

What do you think?
Post your review now

clear rating
Min 1 star. Zero stars will be treated as unrated.

*mandatory fields





Top Stories

Ridley Scott interview

Ridley Scott interview

Director Ridley Scott tells Cath Clarke why he's making a science fiction comeback

Cannes Film Festival 2012: half-time report

Cannes Film Festival 2012: half-time report

Dave Calhoun reports on the hits, misses and a shocking new masterpiece from Michael Haneke

Wes Anderson interview

Wes Anderson interview

Cath Clarke talks to the director of Cannes's opening film

Open-air movies in London

Open-air movies in London

Cath Clarke rounds up this summer's crop of outdoor film screenings

The 100 best French films

The 100 best French films

In honour of Cannes, we reveal the best French films of all time

Ken Loach interview

Ken Loach interview

Ken Loach talks to us about his Cannes Film Festival entry 'The Angels' Share'