Film

User reviews of this film

• John Cooper said...

  Posted on Jun 22 2009 20:00 A better film than is suggested in the Time Out review.
  Beautifully filmed and engrossing, it concentrates on character rather than ideas, and is the better for it. A conservative film in the best humanist tradition, it nevertheless highlights the young Victoria's `liberal` views and is a refreshing antidote to those who regard Britain's longest reigning monarch as staid and reactionary. The powerful musical score is effectively
  sentimental, and there is feel-good factor about this film which is irresistible. The contrast between the ravings of ` silly Billy` ( William IV ) and the delicacy of
  young princess is beautifully realized in the sumptuous
  public dinner scene, where the King raves at his wife in front of a hundred or more guests. ` Families!` murmers
  the Duke of Wellington . . Indeed `families` is very the much the subject of this charming tribute to royalty. We are shown the richest and most powerful woman in the world and her efforts to find love and happiness in marriage despite the intrusions of a treacherous world. Feminists - take note!Perhaps Nietzche got it right . .. `women have an instinct for the secondary role, even when the woman in question is ruler of the British Empire. The film ends with Lord Melbourne's wise advice to the headstrong young queen to allow Prince Albert his right to share her work, and Victoria`s line.
  `Do not leave this bedroom . . I am your queen!` seems sad in contrast. In short , this film was much better than I expected, ( being an ardent republican ) and successfully elicited my sympathy for its youthful protagonist.

  Report as inappropriate

• sarah said...

  Posted on Apr 02 2009 16:14 I loved this film! thoroughly recommend seeing it!

  Report as inappropriate

• Debz said...

  Posted on Mar 30 2009 18:47 A brilliant film. Of course it's entirely romanticised, but I have to admit I was actually surprised at how it sort of stuck to the facts (apart from the infamous gunshot wound which no one with half a brain could possibly have imagined actually happened). I think it was an interesting character study of a queen few people bother trying to understand and, of course, the costumes and settings were to die for.

  Report as inappropriate

• MsA said...

  Posted on Mar 29 2009 04:44 We went to see the film as a family. We loved the Elizabeth films and others of the same genre. However, this one was disappointing.
  It was dull. The costumes and settings, though were fantastic. I said on the way home that it's either a huge credit to the costume and set department or telling of the script and acting that my mind kept wondering from what what being played out on screen to the detail of the scenery and dress.
  It was OK, but I'd have been happier curled up on the sofa watching it as a TV dramatisation than I was paying for tickets to the cinema and taking the effort to leave the comfort of the sofa.
  Far from great, but not terrible either. Wait until it's out on TV is my advice.

  Report as inappropriate

• Tony said...

  Posted on Mar 24 2009 17:04 Great fun! It might not prepare you too well for your History finals, but it's a most engaging way of passing an hour or two.

  Report as inappropriate

• kaz said...

  Posted on Mar 18 2009 18:59 Excellent film,I thought the acting was superb,especially Emily Blunt who is a far better actress than Kate Winslet! I

  Report as inappropriate

• usman khawaja said...

  Posted on Mar 17 2009 23:11 the frenchman who directed this very well mannered ,innocuous and perfect drawing room soiree is not to be blamed at all as what do you expect from a script which is designed to showcase queen victoria as a martyr and a saint ,and prince albert is a perfect lover from one of the regency romances ,it is so sweet it actually succeeds at times to look like a historical version of a nursery rhyme as the european royalty appear more sacred then the pope and the dialogues and script appear to be recycled from every stoic and successful period drama about decency ,honour and righteousness that BBC has ever produced .
  blunt as victoria and friend as albert look pretty and they dance a waltz as well as kissing each other fervently a few times but as for any sense of real passion or insight into their emotions or character you seem to be floating in a no man's land as if all the royalty did was talk in highbrow english while the rest spoke german and spied on each persistently and complain about trivial family intrigues as to who was the potential match maker and who was the regent compared to the sovereign .
  it is so reverent it almost becomes irrelevant and at times you want to like it but end up just chuckling at some mildly humoured joke or a politely correct pun but as to
  all real issues regarding socio-political debate or concerning the empire and its role in industrialising the globe or creating a havoc by colonising a quarter of humanity ,the makers have totally avoided any reference as if victoria only lived so she could choose between two viable suitors who have nothing else to do other then woo an 18 year old virgin queen .
  a pretty but rather vacuous drama which might appeal to some ardent fans of british royalty but almost reads like a teenage regency romantic tale between two teenage lovers even if they are royal as if this is of any cosequence at all to the present era .

  Report as inappropriate

• Chloe Clegg said...

  Posted on Mar 17 2009 22:18 A very engaging film with fine performances from Emily Blunt and Miranda Richardson, but it fizzled out towards the end and it was a shame there was such a dreadful schmaltzy song played over the end credits which was completely inappropriate and destroyed the mood of the film.

  Report as inappropriate

• Eleanor said...

  Posted on Mar 17 2009 09:44 Excellent!!!!!

  Report as inappropriate

• Caroline said...

  Posted on Mar 15 2009 09:06 The screenplay must have been written by someone with little grasp of Victorian English. I'm pretty sure Prince Albert would not have used the expression "You know".. ever.

  Report as inappropriate

• mary said...

  Posted on Mar 11 2009 22:31 What a waste of time. Only the costumes were of note.
  Scenery was good. Too many long gazes... must irritate some historians..Nuff said.

  Report as inappropriate

• Midge said...

  Posted on Mar 10 2009 21:43 Thoroughly enjoyed the film, initially not to sure but glad my wife persuaded me to go...the power of a good women...Location shots were great, and it gave me a much better insight in to the early years of Queen Victoria s reign and all of the politics involved.Jim Broadbent was bril...my Kind of King...

  Report as inappropriate

• Neville said...

  Posted on Mar 09 2009 23:21 Excellent movie, full of history, period costumes and a wonderful true story. Only one problem,....it wasn't long enough, I just wanted it to go on and on it was that good.

  Report as inappropriate

• ms said...

  Posted on Mar 08 2009 20:06 A suprisingly good film. Very emotional in parts. Not a movie I would normally go to see, but glad I did. I would recommend this film.

  Report as inappropriate

• Madison said...

  Posted on Mar 08 2009 08:02 Pleasant film. The two leads have great chemistry. Jim Broadbent is particularly funny as the boozy King William

  Report as inappropriate

18 comments: page 1 of 2
1 2