Film
What's on at the cinema plus reviews of the latest movie and DVD releases
Margaret (2011)
Director: Kenneth Lonergan
Movie review
From Time Out London
This is a glorious mess! Kenneth Lonergan’s long-delayed follow-up to 2000’s revered brother-sister drama ‘You Can Count on Me’ finally arrives in cinemas with little fanfare and the bitter air of failure around it. Don’t believe the gossip: the writer-director’s sprawling look at the effect a gruesome accident has on Manhattan teen Lisa Cohen (Anna Paquin) bursts with ambition and specificity in its novelistic, social-drama narrative. Our attention is grabbed right from the gorgeous slo-mo credits sequence of numerous New Yorkers going about their day – not obliviously, but more in a state of expectantly suspended animation. There’s palpable unease in the air (very potently post-9/11), and even as Lonergan sets the stage in a few mundane subsequent scenes – Lisa discussing grades with an instructor (Matt Damon) and flirting bashfully with a classmate – this strange sense of tension never dissipates.Then the accident occurs – a woman, played with one-scene wonder by Allison Janney, gets hit by a bus – and Lisa’s life, as well as the movie containing her, goes disturbingly, brilliantly off the rails. The next two hours are the sort of no-holds-barred psychodrama that John Cassavetes specialised in: Lisa pinballs between raw emotional states while a number of vivid supporting characters, from Damon’s pushover schoolteacher to a brash Upper West Sider superbly played by Elaine May’s daughter Jeannie Berlin, circle her like moths round a frenzied flame. Paquin deserves the highest accolades for her ferociously committed performance, turning what could have been a privileged prep-school archetype into a scorching depiction of adolescent grief. And though not all of Lonergan’s conceits work on a scene-by-scene basis (an upper-crust womaniser played by Jean Reno skews a bit too close to caricature), the film has a cumulative power – solidified by a devastating opera-house finale – that’s staggering. This is frayed-edges filmmaking at its finest.
Author: Keith Uhlich, Time Out New York
Time Out London Issue 2154: 1 – 6 December, 2011
User reviews of this film
-
- John said...
- Posted on Feb 16 2012 21:13 Just stunning. Outstanding performances by all the leads - a truly great film.
- Report as inappropriate
-
- Daniel Damiano said...
- Posted on Jan 25 2012 01:57 My support of Lonergan has stemmed from his play THIS IS OUR YOUTH and first film YOU CAN COUNT ON ME, though since then there has been a growing pattern of a severe lack of restraint, particularly evident in his last play THE STARRY MESSENGER (which he also directed) and now his latest film, MARGARET. MARGARET strives for a Cassavetes-like complexity in its depiction of an uncompromising and seemingly complex character with the messiness of life not usually depicted in mainstream movies. While the attempt is certainly preferable to the usual Hollywood drivel, it still does not make it's own case as a compelling character study. While Longergan offers many Grade-A veterans from the stage and from his own previous work in film & stage, his screenplay is very scattered, almost paralleling the seemingly short-attention span of its lead character (played by Paquin). What may have been an intriguing story of how one's guilt at contributing to a tragic accident effects and changes her, MARGARET merely depicts her erratic behavior, already somewhat evident prior to the accident, and simply goes back and forth between Paquin's guilty conscience, to her passionate desire to deflect her own wrongdoing with trying to get someone else fired and, in the process, losing the momentum of us seeing her character progress or regress in an engaging way. Where as A WOMAN UNDER THE INFLUENCE, the Cassavete's classic, we do not understand right away why the title character played by Gena Rowlands acts the way she does, but as the film progresses, we understand. We see how she could break down, or what could lead her to a certain behavior. In MARGARET, I didn't feel nearly as invested in this character, but more alienated and, ultimately, just sort of wanted her to grow up. I don't think the 4 hour version should be necessary for a film of this scope to have stronger focus. So in stark contrast to Time Out's glowing endorsement of this as a "glorious mess", I can only agree upon removing the "glorious".
- Report as inappropriate
-
- JimE17 said...
- Posted on Jan 10 2012 17:08 Superb film. Not over the top to say it is one of the best I have ever seen. The central struggle of the smart, articulate teenager trying - but to her huge frustration, failing - to solve a problem she helped create is so well observed I found it painful to watch at times. The lead is perfectly cast and caught my sympathy while at the same time making me incredibly frustrated and even irritated. The mix of reckless self confidence and utter vulnerability reminded me of Fishtank and was as well portrayed. Many of the others are brilliantly drawn too and the fact that some of the editing cuts some scenes short just highlights how much skill has gone into the crafting of their character, so none of them need to over-explain themselves. Everything, from the school politics debates, to the opera, to the planned pony trekking week, is there for a reason but the craft of the film is how gently it unwraps it all for you. Thanks to the people at Panton Street for putting it on. If you can't get there, do get it when it emerges on DVD. You won't regret it.
- Report as inappropriate
-
- AbeC said...
-
Posted on Jan 02 2012 21:31
This film is not a mess!
I think this film might have become a failure just because of its history of disagreements in editting and its delayed release. It appears this film has hardly had a distribution at all and the people selling it are convinced already it is a failure, when in fact its excellence deserves to be seen, although its complexity might make it a minority taste. Perhaps it will get cult status and if so, it will deserve it.
The film is about an upper middle-class New York girl, Lisa Cohen, rather spoilt and rather selfish, witnesses close up a terrible bus accident and her life changes.
The moral dilemma in the film is obscured by the girl's seeming misunderstanding or possibly psychological denial of her role in the accident. The dilemma therefore gives way to us wondering how this girl thinks, how she's developping into an adult, the extent to which she's unhinged or merely a teenager.
The film includes quite a lot of incident in the girl and other's lives, which makes it somewhat packed. Though this makes for slightly hard work, there are beautiful intervals of panning shots of New York with languid, filmic music, which couldn't amount to much on a soundtrack CD, but which is perfect for us to reflect on the girl's situation before aerial shots of her walking through New York streets conduct us to her next encounter.
The main relationship of the film is between the girl and her mother – her single, busy, actress mother, whose kindness and help are undermined or obstructed by her own busy-ness and the girl's teenage, grumpy unpleasantness. One can see this relationship at times in a political manner, as a view on the change from tough parenting to kindness and communication. Taken with parents' busy occupations and the labour-intensiveness of the new approach, a thoughtful teenager is inevitably inclined to self-obssession and personal melodrama, and amongst the events of the film, we see this in Lisa Cohen.
Possibly too much is required of the viewer, of experience and thought, to be able to consider the motivations and abilities of the protagonists, but that is really the delight of this film. You have to think hard about the characters and the world they inhabit, and you have a full view of the lives of the characters in order to think and understand.
The film constantly moves towards melodrama, but then moves away, as the none of the characters is allowed to become absurd or insane and in spite of upset they remain rational (loosely, in the case of the self-obsessed girl,) and none of the characters quite sees the others' points of view or indeed what they'd actually done as opposed to what they said they'd done.
There is a delicate portrayal of the girl's beginnings with boys, her awkwardness with an infatuated male friend and her own stronger feeling for a more charismatic boy. The mother's need for a relationship is portrayed, but the man involved, alone in the film, is rather two dimensional, with the exception of an excellent scene at a meal, involving the divisions in America about Jews and Israel. 9/11 haunts the class debates the girl participates in at her private school. In this excellent portrayal of adolescents in all their varying degrees of intelligence, anger, silliness, or delightful oddness is that the girls, especially Lisa Cohen, seem the angrier. The length and pacing of the film make us watch and think about all teenagers so that we can think properly about Lisa Cohen. Indeed the crowdedness of the film is its trouble and its reward – it is not a mess and deserves to be watched carefully and enjoyed. - Report as inappropriate
-
- david glowacki said...
- Posted on Dec 27 2011 00:54 An undercurrent of intelligent film making, always make for absorbed watching..The lead is well acted if a little overdone and repetitious..The ensemble acting is exemplary...However it is a right mess of a film,lacking any cogency and proper structure..It is over long and the editing is poor..The film does not know what direction it wants to takes and what meaning it actually has...To me it is a character study of modern day New York Jewish life.A bunch of characters,although liberal are utterly obnoxious,unforgiving and self serving and intolerant of other people's view points,and the lead role is the worst of all,destroying all before her,in the belief that everyone is wrong and she is right...At best it is a film of some very interesting individual scenes with fine acting,but it never adds up..At worst it is an unfocused mumbo jumbo..Best film of the year it is not
- Report as inappropriate
-
- Joe said...
- Posted on Dec 22 2011 13:12 A film you have to be prepared for. Of the dozen or so people watching this, 4 walked out after 30 mins, after the first crazy argument between mother & daughter. I lasted an hour. The intense realism in this will definitely put some people off. It is not your typical movie-night out. It is though challenging and unorthodox, but if you're not in the right frame of mind, or haven't had a beer or two, you may not be able to bear the slightly psychotic aspect of it. I'll watch it on DVD.
- Report as inappropriate
-
- John o sullivan said...
-
Posted on Dec 16 2011 09:11
Not only the best film of 2011,bust the best of the last 5 years
Its set up is almost operatic
And its final scene as devastating as Melancholia
Paquin would have won every acting award if this had been disributed properly
The whole ensemble is remarkablei
EXPECT THIS TO GAIN CULT STATUS WHEN IT HITS DVD AND HOPEFULLY WE CAN GET THE 3 HOUR VERSION THE DIRECTOR FOUGHT FOR
AND BAFTA GET BEHIND THIS
5 STARS - Report as inappropriate
-
- s ford said...
- Posted on Dec 15 2011 11:27 The film was finished filming in 2006. A fascinating film if ever.
- Report as inappropriate
-
- Paul said...
- Posted on Dec 13 2011 12:29 Yes, like PaulW above this is unexpectedly a late entry into my film of the year. Nine films showing 3D or their 2D equivalents at my WordOfCinema plex, so despite having a season ticket I tracked this down to a local Curzon. So pleased I did and loved the way the film kept opening up down different story threads around a teenager girl in NY. As a farther of teen girl, I could myself laughing out loud at many recognisable moments and can't fault the film despite its checkered history. Death to 2D & 3D pulp, go see this film and enjoy. Can't remember giving a 5* before.
- Report as inappropriate
-
- Paul Murphy said...
- Posted on Dec 10 2011 00:37 Terrific, and a long way from a 'glorious mess'. Paquin sustains one of the best portrayals of the self-absorbed world of a teenager yet filmed, and maybe we ultimately sympathise with her because we've mostly been through those awful years. She leads a great ensemble cast and much of the film's power arises with her head-on battles with other strong characters, many of whom also go full on in other directions. Paquin transfers blame and guilt onto everyone but herself but onlt when she begins to undesrstand other perspectives does she get a little wisdom. One of my films of the year - and deserves much better than only one West End showing at the Odeon Panton St (good for them!), out 3 years after completion.
- Report as inappropriate
Cast & crew
Director: Kenneth Lonergan
Cast: Anna Paquin, Matt Damon, Mark Ruffalo, Kieran Culkin full cast
Genre(s): Drama
Rated: 15
Duration: 150 mins
UK Release: Dec 2 2011
Top Stories
Ridley Scott interview
Director Ridley Scott tells Cath Clarke why he's making a science fiction comeback
Cannes Film Festival 2012: half-time report
Dave Calhoun reports on the hits, misses and a shocking new masterpiece from Michael Haneke






What do you think?
Post your review now