Anna Karenina (12A)

Film

Keira Knightley in Anna Karenina

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>2/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Sep 4 2012

Many people won’t have noticed that Joe Wright has directed two films since ‘Pride & Prejudice’ (2005) and ‘Atonement’ (2007). His LA-set biopic of a homeless cellist, ‘The Soloist’ (2009), was as sparsely attended as its title implies. More saw ‘Hanna’ (2011), a startling chase thriller starring Saoirse Ronan (essentially playing Jason Bourne’s kid sister), but they might not have recognised it as the work of a man whose greatest career accolades have come from putting Keira Knightley in lovely period frocks.

On the surface, his latest outing, another adaptation of Leo Tolstoy’s oft-filmed doorstop, might seem a retreat to the tried-and-true. Knightley’s back. So – and how – are the frocks. But this playfully heightened, sporadically glorious ‘Anna Karenina’ seems to have picked up more from its heroine’s near-namesake Hanna than you might expect – with Wright kicking the fizzy stylisation of his last film up several notches, into territory that recalls Baz Luhrmann (the film even opens on a set of red velvet stage curtains, perhaps not an accidental nod to Luhrmann’s theatrical trilogy: ‘Strictly Ballroom’, ‘Romeo + Juliet’ and ‘Moulin Rouge!’). 

The pop songs have been kept at bay by Dario Marianelli’s lush score, but Wright’s chief postmodern gambit here is setting Tolstoy’s epic Russian romance – horse races, frozen lakes and all – almost entirely within the confines of a theatre, the characters oblivious to their new context as they emote around stage hands and pulleys. It’s a bravely disorientating move, the play-within-a-film providing an effective metaphor for the inescapable gaze of Moscow high society as Anna rebuffs her stodgy husband (Jude Law) for the studlier attentions of cavalry officer Vronsky (Aaron Taylor-Johnson). There’s much sensual pleasure, too, to be had in watching Wright negotiate the logistics of his staging: visually, it’s his most exquisitely designed film yet, and Knightley, resplendent in exaggerated furs and art-directed lace veils, has never looked more like an honest-to-goodness movie star.

But, as Anna herself learns, all this beauty comes at a price, and while Wright’s ornate contraption dazzles on a scene-to-scene basis, it never really moves us: the passion between Anna and Taylor-Johnson’s mannered Vronsky is smothered by the scenery, while Tom Stoppard’s adaptation fails to forge the emotional connection between their story and the purer parallel romance of Levin (Domhnall Gleeson) and Kitty (the wonderful Alicia Vikander). It’s as if Wright has lavished so much energy on reframing the familiar narrative that the story itself has become secondary: everyone may be inside the theatre in this impressive film, but a Russian chill has crept in anyway.

27

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

12A

UK release:

Fri Sep 7 2012

Duration:

130 mins

Cast and crew

Director:

Joe Wright

Screenwriter:

Tom Stoppard

Cast:

Keira Knightley, Matthew Macfadyen, Jude Law

Cinemas showing Anna Karenina

Filter
  1. Filter

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 2/5 (14 ratings)
  • Joe Wright's films are so hit and miss I put off seeing this until it was released on DVD but its actually his second best film after Pride and Prejudice. Trouble is the film is ruined by the woeful miscasting of the Aaron Taylor-Johnson. You can't help but wonder if they screen-tested Keira and him together at all because they have zero chemistry and his ridiculous facial hair just draws attention to his incredibly blank acting. But apart from that its a fine cast, keira looks as naturally beautiful as ever and I liked the Baz Luhrmann-esque visual inventiveness.

    Popcorn Pig Sun Feb 17
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • This movie gave me a headache. It was the cheorography, I suppose. There was just too much movement almost all the time, in the theatre and then out of the theatre, which I am not used to. On the other hand, as a great lover of *British* (in this case Russian but it is still British-made), I was moved by the story itself. Jude Law was good, Aaron Taylor-Johnson looked very dashing indeed but he was obviously far too young for this particular role. Kiera Knightley was, well, Kiera Knighley, just like in most of her movies up to now. Ruth Wilson was awesome though: what an actress! Great locations too!!!

    GreetingsfromHolland Fri Jan 4
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • A very disapppointing film. It's like a French style comic book illustration of Tolstoy's great novel. It crams nearly all the incidents of the book into a two hour film but treats them superficially. It is artificial and completely lacking in emotion. KN may look pretty but she's not right for Anna - much too shallow - and Vronsky is a disaster.

    Pamela Wed Dec 12 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • The book was and still is the greatest, but the movie was pure disappointment. Keira Knightley was not the right person to play Anna Karenina, even more Aaron Taylor-Johnson was not the person to play Vronsky. I was so anxious to go to see the movie and so disappointed at the end of the movie. This movie should be prohibited from showing, since is the worst presentation of the fantastic book. Leo Tolstoy is one of the greatest writers and unfortunately, so far, there are no movie directors who could of capture on the film the beauty and the depth of this book, the luxury of the epoque, splendour of the castle life and specific society group at that epoque in Russia. Even more different, deep feelings and straggles of each and every character are lucking in this movie. Huge disappointment.

    Vera Wed Dec 5 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Had not read the book and went with an open mind and really enjoyed the film, story and settings. A creative use of a theatre around which the story is told and given the constraints of cinema a good job has been done here with a limited budget. I am sure readers of Tolstoy have clear mental maps of the story and characters but for the rest of us I found KN did a believable interpretation of the story. At times my daughter and I slipped in Harry Potter character spotting, but overall recommended for those who like costume dramas.

    Paul C Thu Oct 11 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • yet another proof of how bad an actress KN is.

    nat Sun Oct 7 2012
    Report
  • I'm very glad I read all the previous reviews before deciding to avoid seeing AK film. My mind has been made up- normally I would view a film and make up my own mind. Having seen KK in a recent film about Freud I am doubtful whether I shall see any film with this actress in! I shall go swimming instead!

    Rosemary Fri Oct 5 2012
    Report
  • Just amazing!!! Fantastic acting, music. I did enjoy the film. Not sure about count Vronsky. His hair really strange.

    Tamara Wed Sep 26 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • The book was great, but the movie was such a disappointing. Also Keira Knightley was not the right person to play Anna Karenina, It was very confusing, was it drama? fiction? romance? theater?comedy? musical? Very sad, that this movie ruined the reputation of the book, which is one of the best books I have read.

    Sandra Tue Sep 25 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Sorry Carol; just re-read my comment and I can see I've descended to 'adolescent bitchiness' myself. Appologies.

    Alan Fri Sep 21 2012
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star