Another Year (12A)

Film

Comedy drama

Another Year

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>5/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Nov 2 2010

Mike Leigh isn’t the sort of filmmaker to make major departures with each new film, to decide suddenly to experiment with sci-fi or set an entire film in a broom cupboard. He can certainly surprise, as with the hellish urban odyssey of ‘Naked’ or the Victorian operatics of ‘Topsy-Turvy’, but mostly this 67-year-old British director makes contemporary, humane dramas about fictional ordinary folk and, from film to film, gently builds on themes and interests relating to how, why and where we live our lives today.

But there’s a cyclical, contemplative tone to ‘Another Year’ that’s unfamiliar, especially after the short, sharp energy bursts of ‘Happy-Go-Lucky’ and the climactic tragedy of ‘Vera Drake’. Like ‘Life Is Sweet’ or ‘All or Nothing’, it’s another film that warmly observes a married couple, their family and their relations with themselves and the outside world. Yet there’s a wisdom and restraint to this film and a confidence of purpose that makes it Leigh’s most mature work to date.

It follows a year in the life of a sixtysomething couple, Tom (Jim Broadbent) and Gerri (Ruth Sheen). He’s a commercial geologist; she’s an NHS therapist, a member of ‘the caring professions’, says her husband, adding jokingly, ‘I don’t care.’ They live together in a home on a quiet street somewhere in suburbia that reflects their settled, earthy personalities. They’re social creatures, and it’s their interaction with friends and family that Leigh focuses on, mostly in their home, over lunch, dinner or a drink at their kitchen table.

Through Tom and Gerri, we meet others at close quarters. Some, we encounter briefly, such as Gerri’s depressed patient, Janet (Imelda Staunton), or a friend, Jack (Phil Davis), with an absent, troubled wife. Others, we come to know better. There’s their old friend Ken (Peter Wight), who visits from the North during the summer and masks an unhappy personal life with ample smoking, drinking and eating, and their son, Joe (Oliver Maltman), a balanced professional who seems sanguine about being single and pops round to see them at home or at their allotment.

It’s at the latter where we see Tom and Gerri at work each season, their gardening offering a nod to the film’s sense of time passing, cycles turning and life going by as we move through spring, summer and winter, each chapter titled as such. Later on, during a beautifully filmed, sombre winter trip to a funeral in Derby, we meet Ronnie (David Bradley), Tom’s older brother, a quiet, bereaved man, a world away in experience and aura from his sibling. Gary Yershon’s meditative, sometimes jaunty score adds to the air of everyday resignation, while cinematographer Dick Pope offers a number of quietly sly framings and makes the most of the story’s seasonal changes.

Each of Tom and Gerri’s friends and family throw light on how stable and contented Tom and Gerri’s lives are, and vice versa. But none more so than Mary (Lesley Manville), a colleague of Gerri, a secretary, a little younger, and a woman whose self-image is all askew. She’s single and unhappy, with a traumatic romantic history, but tries to hide it through mania, wishful thinking, delusions about her age and, again, alcohol. Mary also behaves badly, and a run-in with someone close to Tom and Gerri tests their patience, causing Mary to be temporarily exiled from their welcoming nest.

Mary emerges as the film’s great tragedy, the embodiment of Gerri’s comment: ‘Life’s not always kind, is it?’ Her presence turns ‘Another Year’ from a study of contentment into a portrait of loneliness and longing. Mary tests the patience of both her friends and us, bringing us to another of Leigh’s chief interests: the limits of compassion. How far can we go to help others? Is there always an element of self-interest to caring? And why do we seek comfort in those who can’t offer it? They are all questions that ring in our ears as the film closes on a powerful, open image. It reminds us of Manville’s quietly devastating performance and the stellar work of her fellow cast.
99+

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

12A

UK release:

Fri Nov 5 2010

Duration:

129 mins

Cast and crew

Cast:

Lesley Manville, Ruth Sheen, Phil Davis, Imelda Staunton, Jim Broadbent

Screenwriter:

Mike Leigh

Director:

Mike Leigh

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (65 ratings)
  • This movie is about indifference. I think this movie is also about sort of pity but from a high position - condescension - is it needed or good? What makes people condescend to others? And why did Mary tolerate such condescending treatment? I think she just didn't realize that it was in such a way her "friends" treated her. She sincerely thought they were her friends until maybe the last moment - I think it's such a happy ending, yes - and I'm sure this realization will let her NOT tolerate such treatment from these people, and I think after the final scene in the movie she'll just tell them what terrible people she thinks they are and leave their house to find real friends!

    Anna Tue Mar 19
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Although it was a few years ago since I've seen this film (haven't been able to see it since). I vividly remember it as being a thouroughly patronising formulaic Mike Leigh film with the usual cast of the Mike Leigh Players. This I hasten to add is not because I'm not an admirer of his work (I loved Nut's in May, Bleakmoments and Life is Sweet) I just can't understand why Mike leigh feels the need to centred most of the action on two very smug self centred people who seem to get a kick out of befriending inadequate people who have a major personal problem of one kind or another. Is this in order to show how well rounded and thoroughly understanding a guardian reading middle class couple can be or having the right kind of secure jobs in life give you the qualifications to play social worker with everyone you come in contact with who have a different lifestyle to you? I don't know, all I do know is it's a shame that the climax of the film had to centre on their hostile treatment of Mary through excomunicating her from there circle because she had the audacity to show her feelings in front of their presouse son and his vacuous new girlfriend. Conveneantly refusing to be aware of the selfcentred Son's behavour in leading her up the garden path in the first place. I can't say I've seen such cruelty in a ML picture since Naked and found it made for very uncomfortable viewing. I do hope Mike Leigh will have the temerity to listen to his public when making his next film and may perhaps come up with something a little less predictable with some fresh talent.

    Barnaby Mon Oct 1 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • It's a really good movie. I am not English, either, but have been living in England for some time and I think it captured the details of a regular life pretty well. I see a lot of reactions and body language that you might not encounter outside England (the rest of us out there are more expressive and more vocal). No, I did not think the couple were saints, I thought they were trying their best to be nice...but are human at times. They looked so contented which was annoying slightly; as if they did not need anybody else and were a cut-above the rest who need them. I felt an air of smugness about them. An interesting movie; esp, for people who live or lived in the United Kingdom.

    Goldfish64 Sat Sep 29 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • It's a really good movie. I am not English, either, but have been living in England for some time and I think it captured the details of a regular life pretty well. I see a lot of reactions and body language that you might not encounter outside England (the rest of us out there are more expressive and more vocal). No, I did not think the couple were saints, I thought they were trying their best to be nice...but are human at times. They looked so contented which was annoying slightly; as if they did not need anybody else and were a cut-above the rest who need them. I felt an air of smugness about them. An interesting movie; esp, for people who live or lived in the United Kingdom.

    Goldfish64 Sat Sep 29 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • I think you're all worrying too much about this film. You must know the way Mr Leigh works. He just tells them the situation and gets them to think up lines and act them out. So it's bound to be a bit random and in this case rather dreary.

    rodge Thu Jun 23 2011
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Nina - I am in total agreement. I was confused too: initially I thought that there was no possibility that Mr Leigh could have designed Tom and Gerri as he had and consider them 'heroes'. But then I read an interview with him and that's exactly what he considered them to be. This pair of vicious, two-faced, smug, well-heeled hippies fed their friends' alcohol habits, made minimal effort to help them survive their very obvious crises, and then ultimately stabbed them in the face. I'd have bought Mary a new motor if she'd bottled the pair of them. Plot aside, the film was indeed too long. (But better than being stuck on a plane with Tom on one side and Gerri on the other, I suppose).

    CPEBach Thu Jun 23 2011
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Just saw this on the plane. Yawn...what a waste of two hours, even if it was spent in a metal box. I agree with everyone who stated that the lead pair - the pair that so seemed to be made the 'heroes' were a pair of cruel, boring, self indulgent, patronising and brutally smug characters. I left this film feeling very confused...did Leigh want me to feel thai way over his leads?? And God, the son and his irritating girlfriend were just the worst...I wanted poor Mary to bottle her at one point. I felt Mary was the real hero of the story, it's just a shame that the script turned her into a hideous cliche of what it's like to be a real person with real faults... 2 stars for the effort put in.

    Nina Wed Jun 22 2011
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Eh?

    rodge Mon Jun 6 2011
    Report
  • If the couple were so crule, why invite the brother down to stay for a few days. That's not creul, he'd lost his wife and needed family comforting. Pluz its obvious their paitence with her run thin, they didn't have the balls the say enough is enough. Mary wasn't emotionally reliable, she acted as leech on people, she was perfectly grown up enough to sort herself out, she just acted elusive to make people feel that was mentally incapible of standing on her feet and wanted to drag people in to help her. She didn't like the son really, just an easily manipulated target in order to cure her lonieness. If you seen notes on scandal, your know what I'm talking about. Like she hampered the brother at the door, he was obviosuly week willed, so he just let her in. I think the couple were just good at keeping a straight face, she worked as a helper for people, so for a long period, she'd adjusted to the topics discussed, you have to working in the job she was doing.

    Tim Sun Jun 5 2011
    Report
  • Sue - couldn't agree more. A slightly self-indulgent film whose main characters are smug and quietly vicious to their 'friend'. Irritating characters shouldn't colour one's view of a film, but having read an interview with Mike Leigh in which he seems to treat Tom and Jerry as heroes, I find it even more difficult to like this film on its own merit. Something to give on DVD to annoying Guardian-reading associates to see if they see the joke.

    CPEBach Tue May 3 2011
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star