Argo

Film

Drama

Argo.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong><span class='lf-avgRating'>4</span>/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong><span class='lf-avgRating'>3</span>/5
Rate this
 

Time Out says

Wed Oct 17 2012

It’s a little-known fact that Ben Affleck – celebrity totty, tabloid bait and esteemed filmmaker – has a degree in Middle Eastern affairs from the University of Vermont. It’s a qualification he puts to good use in ‘Argo’, a nail-biting thriller based (fairly loosely) on real events which, for the majority of its length, manages to avoid the expected Hollywood clichés about the Middle East and promote a balanced view of America’s dealings with that troubled region.

It’s 1979, and after the fall of the Shah supporters of the new Islamic rulers of Iran have laid siege to the US embassy, demanding the return of their former leader for trial. But six embassy employees have escaped, and are hiding out in the home of the Canadian ambassador. Enter Tony Mendez (Affleck) a CIA exfiltration expert with a crafty if bizarre plan: posing as a film producer – complete with sci-fi script, production sketches and an ad in Variety – he’ll smuggle the six back to safety.

For 100 minutes, ‘Argo’ is close to flawless. Unashamedly modelling his directorial style on the stark, serious ’70s thrillers of Alan J Pakula and Sidney Lumet, Affleck cranks up the tension expertly. The script is witty and insightful, contrasting US and Iranian popular reactions to  the crisis: it’s ‘Death to America’ versus  ‘Ayatollah Assaholla’. There’s not enough attention paid to character development – Mendez, in particular, never comes into sharp focus – but that was true in the Pakula/Lumet films, too, and it’s mitigated by a superb cast, notably Alan Arkin as an irascible Hollywood old-hand.

But the film’s most abiding pleasure lies in the period detail: using multiple film stocks and reportedly blowing up some of the 35mm footage for a grainier texture, Affleck achieves the look, feel, and almost smell of the late 1970s. From the opening, old-school Warner Bros logo – snatched from a crackly ’70s print – to the closing montage of real photos of the hostages, there’s a commitment to minutiae which enriches the experience beyond measure.

So it’s a shame that Affleck bottles it in the home stretch, bowing to the demands of the multiplex to offer a frankly idiotic action-packed climax, and ending on a note of odious sentimentality. It’s almost enough to erase what’s gone before – but that would be to undervalue the remarkable skill, intelligence and craft that have gone into this oh-so-nearly brilliant political potboiler.

0

Reviews

Add +

Release details

UK release:

Wed Nov 7, 2012

Cast and crew

Director:

Ben Affleck

Cast:

Ben Affleck, Bryan Cranston, John Goodman

Screenwriter:

Chris Terrio, Joshuah Bearman

Users say

0
<strong>Rating: </strong><span class='lf-avgRating'>0</span>/5

Average User Rating

3.2 / 5

Rating Breakdown

  • 5 star:4
  • 4 star:10
  • 3 star:2
  • 2 star:6
  • 1 star:0
LiveReviews|28
1 person listening
ian

I barely lasted an hour into this thoroughly unimaginative contrived film. What finally did me in was the juxtaposition of the script reading with an Iranian women making a press statement. 3 * for.....hhhhmm the moustaches ?! no make that a 2

Kris Subh

It's definitely an absolute thriller superbly crafted and executed by Ben ! Forget the history . Go and watch the film !

Kris Subh

It's definitely an absolute thriller superbly crafted and executed by Ben ! Forget the history . Go and watch the film !

Peter Ludbrook

This is an interesting if flawed film. I thought the potted history of Iran and the interfence in its affairs by both Britain and the US at the start of the film was useful. For many in the audience it must have been an eye-opener. The story that succeeds it is tense and compelling. Yet it's accompanied by a sense of US triumphalism that contradicts the content of that opening. As I understand that the final departure went without a hitch the last minute action sequence came across as very phony. Still it held my attention and there was some sharp dialogue. 3 stars.

K. Flyer

Well worth watching, A very enjoyable movie which was well better than expected. As others have said do not go if you are ecpecting a documentary on real life events. Never let the truth get in the way of a good story is what some would say and Hollywood told a good story based on true events (as they usually do). Great Movie 8 / 10

Nazir

Only 3 things to say about this movie - Fabulous, Fabulous & Fabulous. Definitely go see it!

Nazir

Only 3 things to say about this movie - Fabulous, Fabulous & Fabulous. Definitely go see it!

Sutton

A very enjoyable, well made film. Gripping throughout with some good performances from the ensemble of top actors. The title scene at the start was a nice retro touch.

Robert

This is a very, very good and entertaining film. The plot is tight, suspense is maintained throughout keeping you on the edge of your seat and the film is well scripted and well acted. This more than makes up for having made the mistake of seeing The Master recently, which was as awful as this was entertaining. Definitely 10 out of 10 and 5 stars.

Robert

This is a very, very good and entertaining film. The plot is tight, suspense is maintained throughout keeping you on the edge of your seat and the film is well scripted and well acted. This more than makes up for having made the mistake of seeing The Master recently, which was as awful as this was entertaining. Definitely 10 out of 10 and 5 stars.

critique

Interesting, fluid mix of drama, thriller, history and (in the Hollywood segments) comedy.

Simple Simon

Oddly enough, I agree with most of the 'user review' comments here, both good and bad: Argo is a well made film with great screencraft. Affleck can direct, there is lots of atmosphere and period detail. I found it gripping. There are some good performances, some less so. Character development is limited, The ending is cliche. So far it's nudging up towards a 4star rating! But this is not a story that needed to be told. If Affleck wanted to do a credible piece on the CIA in Iran, there's decades of their support for the Shar and his death squads to draw on. So why this? The first half was great, until the distasteful political subtext put me off.

NILES CRANE

To enjoy this work one must view it as a film not a documentary. It's drama. It's fiction based on fact.It's a lie well-told. It certainly sustains the viewer's attention. It's hardly boring. Well-structured story, very well acted and cleverly written. Maybe not to everyone's taste but if you read the reviews, watch the trailer you'll have a good idea if you're likely to enjoy it. It's not the best film of the year but it is certainly very good and well worth a visit to the cinema.

Numpty

Hmmn.. Having gone by the high Timeout rating, but without reading a review, I had no idea what to expect from Argo. . I thought the first half hour was gripping and really quite edgy. Lots of period detail, good camerawork, decent acting. A real treat.. Then it all degenerated into a self-serving American flag waving propaganda piece, with the CIA cast in the role of 'budy cop' good guys! Such a liberty!! . 5 minutes on Wikipedia shows this to be willful misdirection from the real issues surrounding this period of the region (yeah, mostly Western Imperialist stuff!) I left the cinema feeling used and manipulated, like watching a Fox News Gulf War report! As with the racist and homophobic 'The Devil's Double' (An Iraqi set lampooning of Sadam Hussein's psycopathic son Uday), I smell a stinky agenda.. . **Iranians are bad/ backward/ victims, who need 'liberating' by the American War Machine**

Jay

The ever so reliable Affleck does it yet again with "Argo": a film that entertained me boyond it's absurdity and historical ambiguity: A pleasurable experience all round. Props to Ben Affleck for delivering a sublime hat trick with "Gone Baby Gone" and "The Town". Once a blip under Matt Damon's radar, now an assured director.

Matthew McKinnon

Exactly what MikeT said. I'd like to add that this is nowhere near 70s Lumet or Pakula's league - that's just lazy journalism making an easy comparison. This is a bland, tepid movie: full of boring Hollywoodisms [nauseating score, dull redemptive character arcs, mild racism]. It's not bad, it's just horribly over-rated. | Also interesting to see Affleck's character - who has been established as apparently being a bit of a drinker/on the skids/ out of shape etc - showing us his ripped, muscular chest and cancelling out all that character development in one shot.

MikeT

Anyone going to see this movie should be aware the trailers take at least 20-25 minutes, so I was a little bit bored before the film began to roll. If you’re of a certain age (eg 40+), you’ll have seen a fair few Middle Eastern / hostage / thriller type movies in your time. Affleck’s choice of character types is very formulaic - right down to the nerdy nervous pain-in-the-neck who pulls through for the group when the chips are down. . I don’t think this is a bad film, but neither is it great. It’s sure to turn up on TV on Christmas Day (2013). Alan Arkin’s role should have been rewritten and made bigger once he was cast - he can knock spots off many of the cast and was very good in this. . Though I think "Argo" will get a few nominations (as Hollywood currently loves Bennifer), I’d be really surprised if this film won any major awards. For a thriller it wasn’t that thrilling. I saw this at Cineworld Fulham - where the audience attention span is above average - and around the 1hr15m mark there were a fair few smartphones coming out, and two walked out. It was reassuring to see my opinion that Bennifer completely loves Bennifer has been maintained- he had himself filmed dressing in front of a mirror - something the movie didn’t need, but Bennifer’s vanity clearly did. I would have given this movie three stars, but Bennifer’s nauseating vanity brings it down two stars.

Ian

I agree re the rather cliched ending but apart from that this is an excellent film. Well made and acted and yes it does hark back to the classic 1970's thrillers. All around excellent acting and a real joy of a thriller. I will be very surprised if this doesn't get a best film and director nomination for Affleck. Also there wil be no justice if Arkin doesn't get a best supporting actor nomination. Go see. It is a good 4 star film with the poor ending sadly reducing a 9 out of 10 film to an 8 for me.

john o sullivan

The greatest compliment you can pay Argo is like Day of the jackal, although you know the outcome it still grips When film makers like Malick and Anderson are revered like Messiahs heres a meat and 2 veg type of director from the Bigelow/Eastwood school of controlled narrative with realistic performances from all the cast Agreed the ending is a bit soapy but whats gone before is great filmmaking it deserves nearer 5 stars and is the best film in the english language thus far

yiorgos

A huge disappointment after Afflecks first 2 directorial efforts. A thin script - the satirical hollywood elements barely evident, a 'hero' and a bunch of hostages we don't care about and a ridiculously protracted escape finale.

sticky

Excellent suspense drama, grips throughout from first frame to last. Great direction and acting from Ben Affleck, understated rather than showy. Lots of witty one-liners as well, notably from Alan Arkin and John Goodman. Will definitely be one of the favourites for Best Picture and Director at the Oscars.