Atonement (15)

Film

War films

migrate.31475.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>4/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Sep 4 2007

The first hour of ‘Atonement’ is an electric experience, during which one feels that Joe Wright (‘Pride and Prejudice’), the film’s young director, and Christopher Hampton, its screenwriter, have a clever grip on the potential of Ian McEwan’s novel to inspire more than just a well-crafted adaptation and a lyrical, intelligent film in its own right. McEwan’s book is about the telling of stories, about the perception of others’ tales and about delivering a lie to a rapt, conditioned audience for reasons of self-preservation: a key character even pleads to be believed with the defence that she saw something happening, ‘With my own eyes’. What greater appeal is there to the potential ability of cinema to twist, mould and convince us?

Wright tightly harnesses these ideas in the first, and longest, of the film’s three chapters. We’re in a smart country house in the late 1930s, just a few years before the war. Cecilia (Keira Knightley) has recently come down from Cambridge; Robbie (James McAvoy), her university contemporary and son of her parents’ housekeeper is dabbling with landscape gardening; and her brother Leon (Patrick Kennedy) is coming to dinner with a friend, the arrogant industrialist Paul Marshall (Benedict Cumberbatch). The performances are enjoyable and spot-on: Cecilia’s brittle beauty; Robbie’s educated but tempered confidence; the wily camaraderie between Leon and Marshall.

There’s clearly an attraction between Robbie and Cecilia, yet his connection with the servile classes and her inherited snobbery is holding Cecilia at bay. The class divide persists when Cecilia’s sensible 13-year-old sister, Briony (a terrific turn from Saoirse Ronan) – already dabbling in writing and staging plays at home – constructs her own, deluded fiction around the goings-on between Robbie and Cecilia that see Robbie falsely branded a ‘sex maniac’ and rapist. As with the coming of war to Brideshead, the spell is broken, the Second World War begins and Briony, later as a young adult (Romola Garai) and, much later, as a dying novelist (Vanessa Redgrave) recalls the errors of her youth.

Far from ‘unfilmable’, as some have described it, McEwan’s book offers real opportunities for a filmmaker to thread the perils of storytelling into an epic narrative that bursts out of the attractive claustrophobia of a rarefied world and onto the ravaged, classless beaches of Dunkirk and the fortified streets of London as Cecilia and Briony both, separately, work as nurses during the war and try to deal with their recent past. For the country-house scenes, Wright wisely makes us complicit with Briony’s perception of events, yet such is the strength of the director’s tactics in this chapter – repeated scenes, messing with time, the sound of a typewriter doing its damage on the soundtrack – that when he loosens his approach for a more traditional telling of the narrative for the rest of the film, one can’t help but be disappointed.

Compared to these earlier episodes, the film’s later scenes are more pedestrian and Wright becomes more prone to visual swaggery: a technically impressive but artistically questionable five-minute tracking shot of the carnage at Dunkirk; the nurses marching in formation around a hospital as lights go off above them one-by-one; the rush of water through a tube station as a character drowns – all these grate as one feels that Wright, rather than tackling the pitfalls of storytelling instead succumbs to its audience-pleasing thrills.

A noble, well-made, superbly performed and photographed (by Seamus McGarvey) semi-failure then, but still one that shows Wright to be one of the more imaginative filmmakers of his generation, capable of winning over large audiences with daring endeavours.

99+

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

15

UK release:

Fri Sep 7 2007

Duration:

123 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 4/5 (87 ratings)
  • Interesting to conjecture what some of the great directors of the 40s (Lean and others) could have made of this flawed film. Some very good scenes but i always felt that truth was sacrificed for dramatic impact. whatever the flaws the film was superbly saved by that final act: the shabby flat; the - quite clearly - one-night-stand with a transient soldier; the acceptance that the sisters could never be reconciled - beautiful

    PAUL Wed Jan 2
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • watching this film i was caught by te second of watching it. It gives you a real insite on different peples view with flash backs.! my pesonal best clip is the dunkirk beaches which always brings a tear to me eyes but nly because of my boyfriend being out in a war i think. I am writing a english report on this and not sure how to worite my article but now i have got some idears due to some peoples comments thankyou! it has given me a real insite and how to look at the film.

    emily young Sat Jun 12 2010
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • Loved the film, for it's typical authenticity of a British historical event. My only quibble of the whole film ( not the book ) is that I found it hard to believe that a black American soldier would have been at Dunkirk, a year before the yanks entered the war. Other than that, a brillaint addaptation of the book.

    C. Gibson Mon Mar 8 2010
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • I was unsure about this film when I read the synopsis and then a few of the comments but I must say this is one of the best films I have seen for a long time. Not going to go in to details or analysis, Usman has already done that earlier in this list. Suffice to say that I was extremely glad I watched it.

    Beau Sun Oct 19 2008
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • I found the film to be interesting from a Psychological point of view as to what motivated the characters to behave in the way they did...such as Briony's childish crush on the Gardner that lead to her dissapointment when he did not return the favor of her "love"; the seduction scene by the very precocious Rose (I do not believe that she was raped nor were the marks on her arm caused by the twins--but by her "lover" Paul, etc.... The movie had some lovely cinema photography but was over played. The beach military scene was disturbing and made no sense to the rest of the story. Some great acting (Vanessa Redgrave) but lots of over acting by Ian. I also felt there should have been in the move more scenes that showed Cecilia & Robbie before the Library scene so that we would have more closely believed in their undying "love" for each other.... I still repeat the "you must bite it" line.....great line!

    Lisa Sat Aug 23 2008
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • usman, you are a total slot badger

    johnnyt Wed Aug 13 2008
    Report
  • I hired the DVD expecting a good story, well told. All critical acclaim I had read was for naught. This was rather like the English Patient, a lot of back tracking led to confusion. The acting was excellent, pity about the director. you type in this box will appear on the site

    John McNally Sun May 25 2008
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • The comment you type in site this box will appear your movies too stylish and fast anfd lots more supernatural power in his so that i like yuor movies in your movies lots of action your movies too good your amination seeing on your movies tarrific what can i say super movies.

    rocky Sun May 25 2008
    Report
  • The comment the site just call me now this number am hardly surprised your action movies.

    rocky Sun May 25 2008
    Report
  • Hugely disappointing, ahallow chick flick. Truly a case of the Emperor's New Clothes - has everyone been cowed by McEwan and Hampton's literary reputations? The plot is a soft focus story of thwarted romance whiich badly neglects the real dramatic material in the class tension between Robbie and the aristo family that adopts and betrays him. As for the Dunkiirk scene - quiite cringemakig theatirality from the narrow field of vision packed with expensive props to the awful cor bliimey cockney stereotype squaddie. Rarely can such a long and elaborate tracking shot have failed to create anything more than an impression of a flat packed stage set. Liked the literary tricksiness of Vanessa Redgrave's revelation at the end, but apart from that this film has very little going on up top. Gosford Park it ain't.

    Jon Long Tue May 20 2008
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star