Bright Star

Film

729.fi.x491.bright.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>4/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>2/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Nov 3 2009

Click here to read a interview with director Campion

Not a great deal happens in ‘Bright Star’, Jane Campion’s breezy and beautiful film about the nineteenth-century British poet John Keats (played by Ben Whishaw). The New Zealand director’s film is light in the most attractive and dreamy of ways: it floats on its own, intimately explored love story and refuses to be weighed down by either period fixtures and fittings or the later reputation of Keats, whose final years and stalling romance with his neighbour Fanny Brawne (Abbie Cornish) Campion handles with a smartness and sensitivity that feel teasingly throwaway.

That’s not to say there’s anything slapdash about Campion’s story of how Keats moved in next door to the fatherless Brawne family and fell in love with slightly younger Fanny, tentatively courting her and writing her wonderfully honest letters but fatally kept at a distance by poverty and illness. In fact, for this critic, it’s the exquisite detail of the whole affair, coupled with the aerating winds of modernity that blow gently through the film, rather than the emotional pull of the doomed love affair at its heart, that are the film’s real success. (Others, I must say, differ on this point, judging by the sobs and sniffles to my left and right at the London Film Festival screening of the film.)

A combination of unstuffy dialogue, wise casting, unselfconscious performances and sensuous but never pretty photography makes Campion’s version of the nineteenth century feel current but not anachronistic.

Campion came to Keats’s story, which she shot in Britain last year, after a four-year sabbatical from filmmaking – and it shows, especially following the dark, oppressive atmosphere of ‘In the Cut’, one of her least successful films. Her telling of this biographical tale, inspired by Andrew Motion’s biography, feels as if it’s told by someone with much knowledge but little weight on their shoulders. It’s a feeling one gets from the performances too, especially from Cornish and Whishaw, who both, at times, threaten to float off on a cloud of their characters’ distraction. It’s down to the side players, especially an earthy Kerry Fox as Fanny’s mother and a boisterous Paul Schneider as Keats’s friend and protector Charles Brown, to give the film some vim away from the fog of love. Whishaw, with his troubled air and vulnerable features, is perhaps better as a Romantic lead than a romantic one, and if the film has one crucial failing, it’s that there’s a crucial spark missing between Whishaw and Cornish.

Campion treats Keats’s talent as a given and not a cue for creaky explorations of inspiration and artistic otherness. She weaves his poetry into the drama, calling for it to be spoken naturally and not at all awkwardly by her characters. It’s not easy to follow verse this way, but it certainly inspires the viewer to head straight from the cinema to the bookshop.

Click here to read a interview with director Campion
33

Comments

Add +

Release details

Cast and crew

Director:

Jane Campion

Screenwriter:

Jane Campion

Cast:

Abbie Cornish, Thomas Sangster, Paul Schneider, Ben Hecht, Kerry Fox

Cinematography:

Greig Fraser

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 2/5 (26 ratings)
  • Film protrayals of creative geniuses are seldom convincing, so I was not keen on seeing this one. However, I found it well acted, unpretentious, and full of telling detail. Both I and my partner found it very moving. Everything good I can say about it as a film, your critic has already said. But I disagree with him and many people's complaints that it was not passionate enough. Fanny did her best to carry the romance forward against the warning advice from her worried mother. Keats did his best despite being broke and thus ineligible - and still recovering from nursing his beloved brother to a ghastly death from TB. And he knew that he had a weak chest himself and by his selflessness had vastly increased the risk of dying from TB himself. Those extracts from his poems were partly chosen to show his continual pondering about death during what must have been a traumatic period for him. Hardly the carefree passionate lover desperate to get into her knickers! Do .people think he should have copied his friend Brown and got his girlfriend pregnant? Keats is one of the few Eng Lit giants who seens to have been respected by everyone and loved by his many friends. (They were also broke, but they managed to collect enough money to send him to Italy.) Keats was a man of honour. He knew his health was weak and he had no money. What could he offer her except his devotion, and his innermost thoughts and feelings? And that's what he did.

    Bookhead Mon Mar 26 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • This film was by far the worst film I have watched. It was completly lacking in passion, and was so very, very boring. Absolutely terrible and a total waste of time and money to make and view. Please don't subject us to anymore of this over rated rubbish. Highly disappointing to say the very least.

    Emma Sat Aug 14 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • One of the most boring films I have ever seen!!There was zero chemistry between the leadsThe director tried to compensate with the beauttiful scenery and costumes but even that wasnt When compared to great classics such as Pride and Prejudice,Sense and Sensibillty Cranford North and South It doesnt come even closeAll of the leading actors in these films and series had one thing in common Passsion!!! The best adjective to describe Jane Campion`s film is Dull utterly Dull,and unconvincing

    helen rumjanek Sun Jun 27 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • I can't believe this film is only rated 2* on average by users on your site. I guess a public desensitised by films full of 3D speclial effects and gratuitous sex has lost the ability to appreciate films of this sensitivity and subtlety. Great performances by the leads, particularly Abbie Cornish - Ben Whishaw more understated but I think this was necessary given the hyperbole associated with the Keats legend. Beatiful photography and a real sense of the materiality of time and space to match Keats poetry - the film tells the Keats story through the eyes of the strong but much maligned Fanny - emphasising the sense of early fulfillment rather than tragedy in Keats's short life - although it was still definitely a 3 handkerchief job. My only criticism is that it could have moved a bit faster at times and perhaps could have told more about Fanny's later life how her reputation was later blackened by Brown, considering how much he appears in the film.

    Fiona Mon May 17 2010
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • total waste of space and funding for a vapid torture which tests your fortitude like a vacuous black hole

    miles Mon Jan 18 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Good things in this film: Abbie Cornish's performance, not a minx, as perhaps she is supposed to be partly represented, but a contained openness sustained throughout the film, which makes her continually compelling to watch. Many, many shots which are beautiful without just being vapidly pretty. A flow of shots which leave no doubt you are in the hands of a real film-maker. A woman's sensibility that is not just in the sympathy shown to the female characters, but in small incidental details - the repeated part played by the cat which is not necessarily going to do what the film-maker dictates. The scenes where characters sing and dance, entertaining themselves - it may be a-historical, I don't know - but seems more lifelike, fun, even antipodean of outlook, than the mannered periodicity we usually get in period films. The poetry: some of the magic of poetry - a difficult ask in films - is achieved without mawkish, full-blown sentimentality. The film is too long, you know it's going to end badly, so hurry up and die was my churlish thought. But Cornish's portrayal of grief was so powerful no wonder people wept in the cinema. Too many of the user reviews above seem to be driven by the usual Brit emotional constipation and/or a desire to appear superior to the common ruck. Finally, Jane Campion is one of the great film directors, yet her body of work is barely mentioned. Would this happen with de Palma, Scorsese, Hitchcock? - don't think so. Just another chick film - yeah?

    maurice mcnamara Mon Jan 11 2010
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • Can't believe Jane Campion made such a weak film. It was like A level students or acting school grads trying to show how much they appreciated poetry. Don't agree with the comments that it was beautifully filmed either!

    Quixote Thu Dec 31 2009
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • I was looking forward to sseing this film.so it's sad to report that I found it very disappointing. At no point did it spring to life and there was no spark between the two leads. The result was that I was left completely unmoved by the film which I had not expected. I don't mind films that are slowly paced and a personal favourite is Ozu's "tokyo Story". At the cinema I saw it at (Richmond Curzon) I couldn't always hear the dialogue. It was as if the actors were swallowing their words. I found the music very intrusive and found it absurd that the poem read over the final credits was frequently drowned out by it. Horrible arrangement of Mozart as well! This film vies with "In the City of Sylvia" as my worst film of the year.

    Peter Ludbrook Sat Dec 26 2009
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • My wife loves the poetry of Keats and loved the film. It made her cry, and she thought that the two leads were just fine.

    Cappy Wed Dec 2 2009
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • I don't know much by Keats but, for what it's worth, I do enjoy the novels of Jane Austen, written shortly before this period in history; so I didn't expect the film to be action-packed. That said, "Bright Star" made Merchant Ivory seem like Tarantino, plodding along, with dull or irritating characters (Mrs Braune; Mr Brown) and a leading man who looked and sounded out of his depth. Abbie Cornish was good. For someone who strives for authenticity, Jane Campion should note that Mr Brown would not have written with his left hand - a common mistake with nineteenth century adaptations.

    Cappybear Wed Dec 2 2009
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star