Burke and Hare (15)

Film

Thrillers

BH-03371.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Oct 26 2010

If comedy is tragedy plus time, it stands to reason that the more time passes, the more tragic the event we can be persuaded to laugh at.  The murder of sixteen people – and the sale of their bodies for medical research – doesn’t exactly scream ‘comedy gold’, but set it in the nineteenth century, make it more a tale of poverty, pratfalls and political intrigue than actual hands-on killing, and hire ‘American Werewolf’ maestro John Landis to direct, and bingo. While ‘Burke and Hare’ can’t claim the wit, style and invention of Landis’s earlier grisly masterpiece, it does mark a major return to form for a director who has spent the better part of a decade in the wilderness. Rest assured, it’s a hell of an improvement on ‘Beverly Hills Cop 3’.

Simon Pegg and Andy Serkis play William Burke and William Hare, Irish immigrants to Edinburgh who turn to body-snatching when other enterprises dry up. As the presence of two such likeable actors might suggest, Burke and Hare aren’t the villains here, just hapless ne’er-do-wells desperate for cash. The real bad guys are, well, just about everyone else: Tom Wilkinson and Tim Curry as devious doctors, Hugh Bonneville as the sleazy surgeon general and David Hayman as cut-throat gangster MacTavish.

And it’s this rogue’s gallery of homegrown comedy and character acting talent which makes ‘Burke and Hare’ the pleasure it is: Pegg and Serkis are relaxed and likeable in the leads, Wilkinson and Curry hissable as their adversaries, and there’s sterling support from five decades of familiar comedy and classic horror faces: Christopher Lee, Jenny Agutter, Bill Bailey, Reece Shearsmith, Jessica Hynes, Stephen Merchant. The gold star goes to Ronnie Corbett’s impeccably infuriated turn as short-arse militia captain McLintock, though a single-scene cameo from Paul Whitehouse as a tuneless inebriate runs him close.

The one bum note is struck by Isla Fisher as Burke’s would-be girlfriend Ginny, but it’s hardly her fault: her Scots accent just about holds to the end of the movie, but her part feels awkwardly bolted on to provide romantic interest and sexual frisson. It doesn’t work: when the rest of the plot concerns dastardly deeds done down dark alleys, the sight of Pegg and Fisher making eyes at one another feels clumsy and inappropriate.

Landis directs like an old pro, cluttering the screen with intriguing little details (surgical tools, scientific equipment, body parts) and displaying a nice line in absurdist comic asides. The humour may be too broad in places – corpse-based slapstick pales with repetition – but, for the most part, ‘Burke and Hare’ is well-timed and often funny. Whether we ought to be laughing at this sort of thing is another matter, and reading into the actual facts of the case (most of the victims were women, Hare shopped Burke to save his own skin) does leave the movie feeling slightly vulgar and tasteless – but doesn’t prevent it from being highly entertaining.
40

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

15

UK release:

Fri Oct 29 2010

Duration:

91 mins

Cast and crew

Director:

John Landis

Screenwriter:

Piers Ashworth

Cast:

Isla Fisher, Simon Pegg, Tim Curry, Christopher Lee

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (26 ratings)
  • I'm going to disagree, ScrumpyJack. If a film's so bad that other people leave, I'd want to know about it if I was visiting this site to find out from audience reviews whether the film was worth seeing. With tickets easily in the £13-15 range in the West End, I'd want to know if a film stank. Aware that the film was only 90 minutes long, I left after an hour, feeling that staying for the remaining 30 minutes was a waste of valuable life. A couple in the audience felt likewise only a minute or two before me. The advantage of this site is that regulars like you and I can leave genuine opinions. Unfortunately that's open to abuse from film marketing departments, film distributors, and others in the film industry, including directors, actors, budding actors, etc all of whom have a considerable financial interest in making even a desperate flop come close to paying for itself. You must have noticed the "new" audience comments left 9.30 onwards on a Monday morning on films that have had bad reviews from regulars all through the weekend. It's reasonable to expect differing opinions. I'd want to know if a film was bad. I really disliked Burke & Hare. It seems I'm not alone. Subjectivity.

    Mike Fri Nov 5 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • What a truly bizzare set of responses ! 'Crystal' claims that 50% of a paying audience walked out. (Something I have never seen in twenty years of cinema going - although I am excluding fire alarms...). And 'Mike' tells me there were twelve people occupying a cinema built for three hundred. And yet I went to a full theatre with an appreciative audience ! Either this is the most devisive film since Ealing Studios was set up, or there is some kind of agenda at work here which I just don't understand. And no, I don't work for a "marketing department" - I'm just a film fan,

    jono Thu Nov 4 2010
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • Mike, If you left before the end your comments are void.

    scrumpyjack Thu Nov 4 2010
    Report
  • This is my favorite film of the year so far. Quirky, original and so eccentric and witty. It's like a period episode of spaced.

    Anthony Thu Nov 4 2010
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • I went to see this on “Orange Wednesdayâ€�, when any film worth its salt packs ‘em in, as there’s a 2 for 1 cinema ticket deal. There were 12 of us in a Central London cinema that takes 300+! By the time I walked out after an hour, there were only 7 left. Not as bad as Crystal’s experience below, but still bad. This film is tedious – just plain terrible. The couple in front of me were having an open conversation about his day at work – their conversation was more interesting than this film. I don’t agree with Crystal about this film going straight to DVD, it should have been abandoned. Be warned: - To me it looks like film industry marketing departments have been busy filling this page with fake 4 and 5 star reviews. This film is worth 1 star at best. Avoid. Alternatively, take your duvet and you can have a snooze – you won’t miss anything.

    Mike Thu Nov 4 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Q) How bad does a film have to be to lose 50% of its audience? A) As bad as Burke & Hare. This film isn’t vaguely funny, it’s badly scripted and boring, it’s poorly acted, and the pratfalls are terrible. “Aliceâ€� the only thing this film is reminiscent of is b0110cks. Made for DVD. PS Is it true the corpses they use in this film are the bodies of actors who expired when they realised just what a terrible film this was going to be and that it’d mark the end of their careers anyway?

    Crystal Wed Nov 3 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • simply good fun. go see. 7/10

    scrumpyjack Wed Nov 3 2010
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • Just ignore all the critics and make up your own mind. It is a very watchable film, not full of belly laughs, just an enjoyable film and slightly reminiscent of the old Ealing films.

    Alice Sun Oct 31 2010
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • The comment you type in this box will appear on the sitWhat a jolly romp! The subject matter is rather appaling but the script and the dfirection have turned it into a very amusing and at times hilarious movie. Thoroughly enjoyed it. Lots of unexpected faces pop up along the3 way to keep us amused and interested. Great fun.

    bubbles Sun Oct 31 2010
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • I found the film amusing and - odd though it may sound - rather charming. The audience around me were laughing a lot, despite some reviewers having deliberately "leaked" a numberr of the visual jokes to expect. Overall, I found the film much more enjoyable than the reviews had indicated : has John Landis secretly done something which annoyed the film reviewing establishment ???

    Jono Sat Oct 30 2010
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star