Equus

Film

Not yet rated

Be the first...

 

Time Out says

Lumet's reverential adaptation of Peter Shaffer's play all but defies sane comment: the sub-Lawrentian pretensions that theatre audiences took so seriously stand revealed in all their Pythonesque absurdity when transposed to the screen. The problem is very basic: theatrical symbolism just isn't the same as filmic realism. Add to this that Burton lacks even a shred of credibility as the psychiatrist, and that Firth's performance - technically faultless - is periodically interrupted by scenes in which the awe-struck camera simply observes him undressed, and you begin to comprehend the film's true wretchedness.
2

Comments

Add +

Release details

UK release:

1977

Duration:

137 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 0/5 (0 ratings)
  • Good old Time Out: the ONLY guide to see how poorly Richard Burton plays the psychiatrist. It was his ponderously thundering tones that drove my wife away after 5 minutes. If only she had stayed to watch Peter Firth: a great performance there, that kept me engaged till the end.

    Mawang Mon Dec 12 2011
    Report
  • Yeah the pythanesque aspect is unfortunately valid. What starts off as a Bergman style flic (Solemn intervalled converstaions with the camera etc) does become quite ridiculous by the fifth "Chinkle-Chankle" and "Ark of the Man-bit". But surely no more ridiculous then many aspects, parlances and catchphrases of religion. Perhaps "Centuar" would have worked better as a title for the merging of man into godhood, or was it all a horsehead erection? You're right that Burton isn't quite convincing as a shrink but he does the burnt out aspect all too well, and Peter Firth is marvelous. One suspects they really shold have replaced Buffalo Bill in Silence of the lambs with this horse worshipping character to really unerve the audience!

    Rohne Hill Tue Aug 18 2009
    Report
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star