Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

Film

Drama

720.fi.x491.harryMASTER.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Thu Jul 9 2009

Click here to read our exclusive interview with Daniel Radcliffe

Harry shaves! Harry snogs! But stay your wand, there are other forces of darkness besides late adolescence which are afflicting the poor orphaned wizard of Hogwarts and his hormone-raging contemporaries. For one, Voldemort’s allies, the aerial, ink-trailing Death Eaters, are ravaging London. Ping! Pling! There go the stanchions of the Millennium Bridge! And Harry has hardly been re-admitted to school, following the departure of Mrs Umbridge, last term’s knit-robed Robespierre, when Dumbledore teleports him to Tudor-relic Budleigh Babberton to meet and recruit one-time Potions Master Horace Slughorn (Jim Broadbent, disguised as a sofa).

False-memory syndrome is at the heart of this next stage of the fight against evil forces: Dumbledore’s phials of stored reminiscences have been polluted, and it is sly Slughorn’s recall of his past tutoring of a Horcrux-fascinated student which may hold a necessary and life-saving corrective.

Longer than the last, the sixth episode of the adventures of the increasingly burdened magic warrior of Privet Drive is a more human affair than its predecessors. It’s as full of the romantic dalliances of the maturing students as it is of warring set-pieces, creature shocks and detours down dark Dickensian alleys. We can already sense the two-part seventh and final saga on the horizon, and the whole less-frenzied affair is tonally and emotionally suggestive of a post-battle re-grouping before a final cinematic assault.

To this end, scriptwriter Steve Kloves, back after a one-film sabbatical, has ably summed up the JK Rowling doorstopper by omitting a major battle and axeing at least one character. Also, the fine, less showy work by new DoP Bruno Delbonnel and Nicholas Hopper’s non-strident second Potter score are in tune with director Yates’s laudable refusal to underline too forcefully moments of triumph and disaster. Togther, they allow space for as much human detail, intimacy, humour and, indeed, pathos as a family magical/fantasy action adventure will allow.

Thus – thrillseekers beware – the film’s memorable scenes are, interestingly, not necessarily the most momentous: the sad, assembled Weasleys regarding their crooked Norfolk tower; a lionine, wind-tossed Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) framed in the Hogwarts tower with all the grandeur of Powell and Pressburger’s ‘Black Narcissus’; poor Emma Watson’s Hermione crying in solitary heartbreak; blonde bombshell Draco Malfoy pitied in a picture of isolated evil. Rupert Grint’s Ron is still the leavening star – striking funny, victorious poses in the series’s last game of Quidditch – but Daniel Radcliffe’s less self-conscious and more self-deprecating Harry runs him a close second.

Click here to read our exclusive interview with Daniel Radcliffe

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (95 ratings)
  • I Agree this is the worst film so far - is too extreme & is too far removed from the original stories which were meant to be magical and fantastic- needed more lighter moments in it - and Harry and Hermione nakedly entangled was a step too far - very very disappointing

    Gillian Sat Dec 4 2010
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • The worst film yet! and to slit it into two parts is just to get more cash out off people, did they raed the book? so many great bits missed. Too tame and far to long to sit and watch actors sitting about.

    paul Sun Nov 21 2010
    Report
  • oooft..what a fitty ;) needs a shave though!! havent seen the film but am planning to. :D

    harry potter..yum Tue Dec 22 2009
    Report
  • boring, alright but borning kinda x

    layla Fri Nov 20 2009
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • I loved the movie, was very boum same, only that it should have a bit more detail ... I love Harry Potter ♥

    Sabrina Thu Sep 24 2009
    Report
  • i thought that the harry potter movie was a let down!!!!! i have the book nad it is nothing compared to book!!! The film in my opinion needed more graphic events to occur, the book provided fairy tale thoughts of a non-fictonal world, it maid the thought of it seem real, the film however completely ruins it! I have also read the 7th book, the deathly hallows, that book can not be ruined, it is full of imagination, fingers crossed!!!

    Sam Mon Sep 21 2009
    Report
  • the film was really good and i think u should watch it

    bobby Sun Sep 6 2009
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • This particular Harry Potter film was excruciatingly painful for me to watch as always the book was 100x better but it clearly did not reach expectations. People have said that the film was too long but in my opinion it was far too short as there were loads of important details missed in the film. I am sincerely hoping that the deathly hallows is a LOT better.

    adam Sat Aug 29 2009
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Dis Wz Da Shittest One Ive seen nd i saw all of dem what happend to harry havin his moment of defeatin someone in the dark forces da ended woz reli bad it ooked as iff dat shud have been the middle nd more was meant to happen Very disappointed !!!!!

    kay Tue Aug 25 2009
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • this movie was rubbish!

    charlie Sun Aug 23 2009
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star