Melancholia (12A)

Film

Science fiction

Alexander Skarsgrd, Kirtsen Dunst, center, and Charlotte Gainsbourg in...

Alexander Skarsgrd, Kirsten Dunst and Charlotte Gainsbourg, from left, in Melancholia

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>2/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Sep 27 2011

This is a lethargic, pretty and empty study in ways of living and dying from Lars von Trier. The Dane borrows some of the trappings of the sci-fi genre – in the same way he set the Dogme rules for ‘The Idiots’ or adopted a Brechtian austerity for ‘Dogville’ – to follow his peculiar nose for human behaviour. It’s a calmer work than his last, ‘Antichrist’, but it impresses only on a technical level, rather than on an intellectual or emotional one.

For all the time we spend with two sisters, Justine (Kirsten Dunst) and Claire (Charlotte Gainsbourg), whose reactions to the world’s end define the film’s two chapters – it feels like von Trier is in it just for a few images set to music from Wagner’s ‘Tristan and Isolde’. We see the best of them in an opening montage: a moon and a planet cast shadows across a garden at night; Dunst’s character floats in water in a nod to Millais’s ‘Ophelia’ and a planet swallows up Earth.

Apathy or engagement, looking inwards or outwards, the expression of depression… these are some of the film’s themes. The first chapter, ‘Justine’, plays out at her wedding in a country house. These scenes are recognisably by the von Trier of old, shot in a handheld style, with jump cuts and flippant talk. The dialogue, though, feels jarring and bogus. For the second chapter, ‘Claire’, the wedding is over, and we’re left at the house. This is where the film feels without a proper script, and Dunst and Gainsbourg flap through scenes of false emotion as Claire is terrified in contrast to Justine’s ultra-passive attitude to the coming apocalypse.

Strip away the Wagner, the opening and a few arresting images, and we’re left with too much filler that feels under-developed, uninteresting and underwhelming. The best of ‘Melancholia’ would make a great photography exhibition. The rest is best forgotten.
86

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

12A

UK release:

Fri Jul 1 2011

Duration:

136 mins

Cinemas showing Melancholia

Filter
  1. Filter

BFI Southbank

Belvedere Rd, London, SE1 8XT Show map/details

  • Address:

    BFI Southbank Belvedere Rd
    London
    SE1 8XT

Map
  • Mon May 27:

    • 18:00
    • 20:20
  • Fri May 31:

    • 20:20
Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (58 ratings)
  • Those who didn't like this film are those who do not accept or much appreciate the power of a visual medium to tell a story or covey any truth that is not part of a literal narrative. Movies are not books just as bike aren't cars. This isn't to say Von Trier is on to something; only that they can't tell us if he is or isn't. Luc

    Luc Thu Oct 18 2012
    Report
  • trollolololololol

    UglyGeezer Wed Oct 17 2012
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • I want my 2 hours back!

    Ashley Wed Oct 17 2012
    Report
  • Very, very seriously, the very worst film I have ever, ever watched. The very worst by far. Having read other comments, I have zero preconceived notions about this director. I have never heard of him before. This film is absolutely the worst piece of garbage I have ever seen in my 45 years of life. No adgenda, no axes to grind, just my honest opinion of the very worst ilm I have literally ever watched in my entire life. I have found amusement and at least some enjoyment in some terrible b movies. This film is quite simply a total and complete waste of film time and actors. If I had paid to see this film, I might seriously have considered suing, it was that appauling and painful to watch. I should be compensated for the couple of hours of my life lost watching this totally shit piece of crap film. If I was not clear.... I think this is among the very worst films ever made. I cannot believe it even made it to the screen.

    Helen Tue Oct 16 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Worst film ever. It does not even deserve half a star. Depressing, disjointed and fake. I have never experienced worse. Reading "The Woodlanders" was an action packed adventure compared to this atrocity. Zero entertaintment, poetry, point at all. Total rubbish. I thought "Blair Witch" was bad until this.

    Helen Tue Oct 16 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • So, so slow and it is not a matter of 'not getting it', there was nothing to 'get'! Boring and a total waste of 2 hours! The only bit that made me smile was the ending where they were all wiped out, hallelujah!!

    Diane Sun Oct 7 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Great film, but not a conventional or a feel good film. The characters are not particularly likeable, and the plot is somewhat awkward. This is not intended to make the audience feel good, this is intended to make the audience think. What made this film good was the philosophy behind it and the possible change in ones paradigm that accompanies it. The truth is that we are all alone in some ways and going in separate directions as our fellow human beings. Most of us are in denial of our own deaths, and the inevitable approach of a metaphorical "meloncholia" (death) that is doomed to hit us all. I can imagine people do not like the way this film reminds them of their own alienation and mortality. Not a perfect film, but unique and worth seeing.

    Matt Wed Aug 1 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • Recommended for those who enjoy watching sickly flowers wilt in slo-mo over 90 minutes! Depressed self-involved females may resonate with this film. Schizoid rich males with mid-life crisis should NOT watch this film - Lars portrays the only reasonable character as a coward who would prefers to queitly commit suicide WITHOUT amidst the heavenly scent of horse poo. Because that's what Lars would do - hate and dump his family if the world is ending! What a great mind!

    SCIFIFANAGAIN Sun May 27 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Pretty cinematography. Ugly everything else: unnecessary nauseating shakycam, pathetic characters, phony meaningless monologues as the empty characters pretend to have a dialogue. Lars obviously have serious issue with the entire human race, animals, plants, and mother earth. There is only one clear point he made for this still portrait pretending to be motion picture: Lars is an empty, miserable, SADISTIC man with excessive interest in breasts attached to a boring pale self-destructive cynical woman with little redeeming quality. Waste of time.

    SCIFIFAN Sun May 27 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Once again those that don't like a film are accused of not 'getting it'. What there is to get is not spelled out. Visual beauty? Yes, but only to underline the corresponding vacuity of content. Badly scripted to the extent of seeming at times like a b-movie. Peoples exchanges didn't sound like natural speech nor were they poetic. A film that signally fails to live up to its organising conceit.

    bob Tue May 22 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star