Nine (12A)

Film

Musicals

742.743.fi.nine.01.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>2/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Dec 15 2009

Best wipe ‘8 1/2’ from your mind, or at least delay seeing Fellini’s loopy masterpiece, if you’re going to enjoy this angsty romp through the director’s 1963 film about a fictional Italian filmmaker, Guido Contini (Daniel Day-Lewis), who loses his mojo and might be about to lose his marbles and his marriage.

Surprisingly, though, there’s lots in this musical version, itself an adaptation of a 1980s Broadway show, that relates to the sombre heart of Fellini’s original. We still get Guido’s formative childhood memory of watching a prostitute perform on the beach (although this time it is Fergie from the Black Eyed Peas brilliantly belting out the film’s foot-tapping anthem ‘Be Italian’). We also get the lingering ghost of his mother (Sophia Loren!), the pain of his adultery and the madness of his creative impasse. Also, Fellini’s meshing of dream and reality is oddly suited to the unreal tendencies of a musical, although it’s anybody’s guess what the director would have made of Penélope Cruz throwing herself around in stockings and suspenders and upping the sex factor beyond anything Claudia Cardinale offered in the original.

The biggest difference, though, is that almost 50 years later, director Rob Marshall (‘Chicago’) is able to play the story of ‘8 1/2’ as a nostalgia piece. He fetishises the look and feel of 1960s Italy and especially Rome so that the film’s mood of artistic melancholia is expressed on a canvas that comes dangerously close to looking like an ad for Italian coffee. Marshall and his writers, including the late Anthony Minghella, also stress the humour of Guido’s philandering, often preferring that his inner turmoil goes no further than chain-smoking. To give Day-Lewis his due, the actor grounds the film’s sillier tendencies in a charming performance of mercurial despair. He’s well supported by Marion Cotillard, who conveys the sadness of being  Guido’s wife, although both Nicole Kidman as his leading lady and Kate Hudson as an admiring journalist are little more than window-dressing.
33

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

12A

UK release:

Fri Dec 18 2009

Duration:

100 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 2/5 (23 ratings)
  • I starred in the musical Nine and thought the storyline was brilliant and when I discovered they were making a movie i thought it would be briliant. However, It wasn't. Aside from the fact they completely missed the point, the talents of the actors was wasted. The film lacked the passion and emotion the play created.

    Hayleigh Mon Jul 18 2011
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Neither having seen the original film, nor the musical, I didn’t really know what to expect – other than the cast was a filmmaker’s fantasy of leading ladies (and that’s the crux of the story within the story in any case). As someone had told me this film hadn’t had great reviews, I deliberately avoided stopping by TimeOut to see what Dave Calhoun had to say about it - I didn’t want to find myself picking holes in a film that had the potential to be great. The cast alone must have costs a few bucks. I’m not a great fan of musicals, but with the exception of a couple of “numbersâ€�, the songs/music were good. A few of the leading ladies might have been wise to spend a little more time with their singing/music tutor. A few songs were just plain bland, but then you get toe-tapping numbers like “Be Italianâ€�, superbly sung and danced to by Fergie, and you think “Wowâ€�. The plot and range of emotions portrayed throughout are not overly taxing, so are well within the range of all the leading ladies – and the acting is flawless throughout, including that of DDL. This is a very visual film – with no great depths of emotion. I couldn’t engage with any of the characters – not even Cotillard, whom I greatly admire. Superb sets, photography, and eye catching costumes. Great to see, but I won’t go back to see it again in the hope of spotting hidden depths – I’m not sure there are any. I enjoyed the film, having no idea of what it was going to be like. It’s the sort of film the studio behind it won’t be ashamed of, but shouldn’t get their hopes up of making a fortune from when it goes to DVD. Worth 3 stars.

    TrickyDicky Fri Feb 5 2010
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • We walk out half way through this rubbish film. Great actors and locations just wasted. Songs a 10 year old would conceive. Do not bother with this one.

    sonnyboy Fri Feb 5 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • WORST MOVIE I HAVE EVER SEEN!!! PAINFUL TO WATCH!!! GREAT ACTORS WAISTED THERE TIME!!! I GIVE NO STAR!!

    Melanie Wed Feb 3 2010
    Report
  • Very very disappointed. I definately had high hopes for this film, espesically because of the cast. It had no story line and nothing made sense.

    Mollie Wed Jan 27 2010
    Report
  • I havent seen such a rubbish film for a long time, my friend booked it.It was a total waste of money, if it shows on TV I dont think people will watch it. It has no story, no event, no progression;, it gives an impression of emptiness, it is slow. There are too many close up on D DL as if he was a grat hero; yes, some of the scenes are beautiful : the ligting, the props the rythm but it stops there, the singing is awful.

    MARIEN Sun Jan 24 2010
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Yes stuff grated, yes it seemed facile, but wan't there a metaphor here.? The film derides what grated and is facile. I also think in the grated and facile there was a bit that alot of the woman who watched it would, maybe privately, like to be a bit of. I loved to see Judy Dench playing her role...sexy and sensible. As I left this film with my two girlfriends it generated a surprising amount of discussion. What is real anyway...the lead man was indulging the apparently 'unreal' but was there a bigger metaphor to be appreciated here? Maybe it depends who is viewing.

    Liz Sat Jan 23 2010
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • Yes stuff grated, yes it seemed facile, but wan't there a metaphor here.? The film derides the what grated and is facile. I also think in the grated and facile there was a bit that alot of the woman who watched it wouldmaybe privately, like to be a bit of. I loved to see Judy Dench playing her role...sexy and sensible. As I left this film with my two girlfriends it generated a surprising amount of discussion. What is real anyway...the lead man was indulging the apparently 'unreal' but was there a bigger metaphor to be appreciated here? Maybe it depaends who is viewing.

    Liz Sat Jan 23 2010
    Report
  • loved it

    Jules Fri Jan 22 2010
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • Don't understand all the negative reviews, it's as if some people were at a different movie, I ABSOLUTELY LOVED THIS MOVIE, going to see it again, and plan to buy the DVD, we need more movies like this, simply outstanding

    Carmel Wed Jan 20 2010
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star