Revolutionary Road (15)

Film

Drama

690.691.x480.film.revolution.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Jan 27 2009

Kate! Leo! Sam Mendes! And a Great American Novel! The stars are aligned! All known film industry computations dictate that if you combine those two from ‘Titanic’ with the British director of ‘American Beauty’ and such heavyweight literary material as Richard Yates’s 1961 novel about the breakdown of suburban dreams in 1950s Connecticut, then everyone involved should be drowning in gold statuettes come Oscar time. But, no, last week this film received not a single major nomination from the Academy, although Michael Shannon rightly received a Best Supporting Actor nod for a brilliant, brief performance that puts his co-stars in the shade.

Shannon plays a wise fool, an unhinged chorus, who speaks out loud the unsayable truths that we come to share about youthful married couple Frank (Leo DiCaprio) and April (Kate Winslet), whose marriage we observe veering from hope to tragedy. From the very beginning of the film, Mendes introduces a tussle between happiness and disappointment, leaping quickly from a jazzy, Manhattan-set scene in which the pair lock eyes on each other at a party to a few years later and a marital argument after a poor performance by April, a trained actress, in a local amateur production. Most of the film spins on this struggle between change and stasis as Frank and April struggle to be the free spirits – too ‘special’ for the suburbs – they believe themselves to be. Mendes is good at identifying small, significant moments, such as the look on Frank and April’s neighbour’s face when they announce their move to Paris: it’s as if they’ve sucked all meaning out of their friend’s small world.

This is a good, thoughtful film, directed with some subtle touches by Mendes (an unpredictable director), acted with intelligence by its leads and photographed by Roger Deakins mostly to avoid suburban clichés. But overall it fails – just – to get to the heart of its main, female character’s tragedy so that its climactic scenes feel hysterical rather than the culmination of all that’s come before. Thomas Newman’s forceful, repetitive score doesn’t help either; its refrain becomes more annoying the more you hear it. Yes, we know this is sad stuff. We don’t need constant reminders.

Winslet gives a good performance as a wife and mother desperately trying to swim against an ever-rising tide, but both she and DiCaprio are rigid at times. There’s one scene in which her character walks across her kitchen to kiss her husband like she’s striding across a West End stage. Yet this niggling sense of theatricality has its upside too, adding to the idea that performance is at the root of this couple’s lives.

This is a horror film about living on the edges of self-perception. It’s about people who are self-aware enough to have ideals and ambitions but at the same time not strong or daring enough to act on them. They have failings, but mostly – and this is something Mendes and his cast communicate very well – it’s their environment and society’s values that dictate their fate.

This is a sobering, well-observed film that doesn’t fully hit the mark but sets up enough pleasing ideas to chew on regarding ambition, marriage and ideals of how to live one’s life, individually and as a couple.
46

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

15

UK release:

Fri Jan 30, 2009

Duration:

119 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (31 ratings)
  • Outstanding! tells the truth, people who dont get are missing out.

    Louise Wed Mar 2 2011
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • Great movie, invoked emotion, they'l owez be those of us tht hv an innate gift to appreciate brilliant works, gues tht xplainz it

    Feisty Mon Oct 11 2010
    Report
  • They just couldn't just move on apart from one another. She is a bitch, he is to in love, chizz, it is that the worst thing they did, was not have dreams, was really to get marry. She selfish, wants to dream of things she didn't achieve, and haven't being able to get over that, with kids already??? common. Horrible tale about two idiots that make the mistake to like each other for a moment, and didn't have the strength to have a live on their own. Beside that, I am a fan of both actors, like their performances, hate the stupid movie.

    Marissa Mon Mar 22 2010
    Report
  • Kate Winslett puts in an Oscar-worthy perfomance in th first Dicaprio-Winslette reunion since Titanic. Its a powerful but disturbing tragic story of middle class grief in 1950'S america. The Kate and Leonardo coupke set out to be special and unique from their peers on Revolutionary road, a residential street but find out that they are nothing special and settle for middle class mediocrity that is unbearable for one of the couples and ends in tragedy. The Kate character has a new plan for the couple to move to Paris and start over but has to get over the Leonardo characters's procrastination and foreboding. Like 'American Beauty' its a film about the facade that is domestic success.The carefully manicure lawns dont tell half the story and its all an image and illusion that is almost bursting at the seams. This movie's theme is in the territory of 'Desparate Housewives' about the misery of daily existence for house wives and working husbands. Kate Winslett is outstanding in this one and her perfomance alone is worthy your time and the admission ticket. A memorable film that you will not forget quickly.

    Henry Zakumumpa Tue Mar 9 2010
    Report
  • whenever I read reviews about films, there is always some idiots that spoils the end... is that right Brooke?

    emma Sun Feb 28 2010
    Report
  • This is the review I have just written that's not here: STRANGLED BY THE STAGE Why now? Why did Sam Mendes decide to make this 50s-set film now? Does he see a parallel in the 50s suburban dream and the current get-rich-quick society? The story is a tragedy. Is there foreboding? Does our future look like this? I think I'm right in saying that Sam Mendes and Kate Winslet have been doing a lot of theatre work in England prior to making this film together. It shows! (As it showed with Winslet as Sophie Scholl). Winslet's acting and Mendes' direction in this film are so measured, hers so enunciated. Even the actor who won an Oscar for playing The Fool was stagey, but perhaps, script-wise, that was unavoidable. DiCaprio struggles valiantly to give the film some spontaneity despite the steam roller that was coming at him, the onslaught of stage-inspired acting and direction from husband and wife team. How this strangled any chemistry between the pair... Considering the briliant sponaneity of American Beauty, I did wonder if for Winslet and Mendes to work as a team was a good idea. I did wonder if Kate had told Sam that this role was hers and hers alone... I never believed for one moment that she was part of the scene they hung out with. And wouldn't they have got a sock in the jaw for their attitude of smug superiority? That's not the America I know, then or now.. Kathy Bates and the other supporting cast were also able to bring the breath of spontaneity to their performances. The settings and props were perfect and the camera that explored them excellent, the editing inspired. The script is strong. I know this because I was a young thing in the 50s and this kind of tragic situation - girl gets pregnant, man and girl are saddled with each other for life - was all too closely familiar with me. How I felt for Mrs April Wheeler - that 'I am TRAPPED' feeling, TRAPPED by an impending unwanted baby and the life style one is trapped within because of it. This is the film's redemption. What a pity it didn't come off!.

    marie Sat Nov 7 2009
    Report
  • I have jut written a review and it's not here. Why not? Otherwise - what a waste of time (out)!

    marie Sat Nov 7 2009
    Report
  • Terribly dreary overproduced pap from the very boring Mendes. Winslet confirms herself as just plain rubbish and Di Caprio is wasted in this nonsense. A very weak film with no soul, nothing to get your teeth into and it just seems painfully too try hard. Rubbish.

    Justin Berkovi Thu Aug 6 2009
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • amazing film.with brilliant acting by Winslet and Leo..showed the darker side of human relations when they are dissatisfied..Kate acting was piece of the cake ..i personally believe Kate and leo should now unite again to have a movie with happy ending.some mills and boons stuff with iota of intellect in it..I want to forget..I want to forget the tragic falls of Rose and then that of April...i am keeping my fingers crossed.

    dr nadeem Sun May 31 2009
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • I really can't see why people think this film is somehow saved by the acting, for me it was partially ruined by it I say partially because the screenplay and directing were as bad so it really was a team effort.

    Jamie baby Sat Apr 18 2009
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star