The Road (15)

Film

Thrillers

theroad.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Jan 5 2010

When Cormac McCarthy’s brutal saga of post-apocalyptic angst won the Pulitzer Prize in 2007, a big screen adaptation became inevitable. Whether or not this was a good idea seemed irrelevant: it was a bestselling book with a timely, inherently cinematic theme; the movie had to be made.

‘The Proposition’ director John Hillcoat’s film is as direct and unflinching an adaptation as one could reasonably hope for. A man (Viggo Mortensen) and a boy (Kodi Smit-McPhee) wander the American wasteland after an unnamed ecological disaster. The trees are bare, the animals dead, the few human survivors starving, desperate, often violent, occasionally monstrous.‘The Road’ is certainly the bleakest and potentially the least commercial product in recent Hollywood history. Both book and movie suffer from the same inherent weakness – they exist purely to make you miserable. Sure, there’s a smattering of subtext – a little eco-politics here, a spot of family psychology there – but the central purpose is to break your heart and shatter your soul.

On which level, Hillcoat’s movie is a resounding triumph. Stunning landscape photography sets the melancholy mood, and Nick Cave’s wrenching score reinforces it. But it is the performances that ultimately hold the film together. We expect this kind of selfless professionalism from Mortensen, and McPhee is appropriately sad-eyed as his long-suffering son, but it’s the incidental characters who steal the show, notably Robert Duvall in a startling cameo which not only distils the film’s key themes into a single three-minute scene, but singlehandedly lifts a potentially drab affair into something quietly impressive. Just don’t expect to walk out smiling.
99+

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

15

UK release:

Fri Jan 8 2010

Duration:

112 mins

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (67 ratings)
  • Beautiful visually and a treasure for that Unrelentingly Hobbesian world depicted but the right questions about that suggested The product placement was a real spoiler. Everything was biege gray except the Coca Cola can and the Del Monte can. Shameful! Scenes that introduced some action seemed to have walked in from another movie. Unconvincing But lots of pleasure all the same. Mortensen brilliant but Therize miscast. She just does not do wretched. She is too glamorous. Not beautiful. Glamorous Real joy is in Mortensen, the music, the art, the photography and the existentialist script. Nice ambiguity about the family at the end who might be going to eat the child.

    Peter Kellow Fri Jul 27 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • Of course we can use our imagination. I could've used my own imagination and imagined a much better story than this crap and not wasted my time watching it. If I were to imagine what caused the apocalypse of this movie, I could think of hundreds, likewise I could think of hundreds of possibilities of what happened after the end of the movie. The family could have truly been nice, took the kid in and they could've survived long enough for his kids to see a rebirth, or his dad might have been paranoid for a good reason, they might have taken him behind the next bush and slaughtered him. Such a wide range of possibilities is not for the purpose of "leaving it to your imagination" it is simply lazy writing. A well written story might not spell everything out for the viewer, but it doesn't leave holes this big either. A well crafted story would give clues and leave the viewer to come up with a list of finite possible conclusions, not an infinite scope of which the viewer might as well have crafted their own story from rather than trying to add this pointless piece into it. There is no point to trying to combine the viewers visions and the authors vision when it is this wide open. Doing so would be guaranteed to be apocryphal anyway.

    Al Sat Jun 2 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Very gloomy, very depressing and a waste of time .didnt get it

    Fj rider Tue May 29 2012
    Report
  • abraham. issac. pre history post apocalypse. whats the difference. biblical. not as good as the book. the kid was rubbish, the script was rubbish, the tone was wrong, the poetry of the book missing...as a film i dont know, but very important....you want to know what happened? what hapened to the world at the beggining of the bible? its a question.

    funkoxen Tue Feb 14 2012
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • Just watched "The road" and feel it is my duty and obligation to try to prevent anyone who reads this from watching the most utterly depressing unredemptive empty inhumane waste of time that I can remember witnessing in quite some time, the road leads to an empty dead end alley on a nauseating journey you wish you hadn't taken to begin with...ugh...I need a shower... (sigh) ...a scene would have made a good coca cola and vitamin water commercial in it... Shameless product placement...lol

    E Sun Feb 12 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Why the big commotion about the thief being caught and stripped of his belongings? As the father said, "I'm leaving you exactly as you left us" (with nothing). There are glimmers of hope in the film. The family at the end. The green bugs near the coast (so there is life out there besides the remaining humans). For those that like it all laid on the table - tough - you'll have to fill in the gaps. We don't need to know why or how the apocalypse happened. The characters probably don't know, so why should we? It just occurred to me that the family that was following them all along were heard above the shelter. I remember the child saying he heard a dog. Perhaps they had survived so well because that was their hideout, or at least they had taken some of the food. If one was aware of an impending catastrophic event, wouldn't you stock up a bomb-proof hideout in your garden? I liked the film. Bleak, slow but thought provoking, which is how it intends to be. I can't help but think those rating the film poorly missed the point.

    Observer Fri Dec 16 2011
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • However 'well' written, acted, directed, produced, this film is, frankly, sick. It sets out to revolt and disgust, which it succeeds in doing. You'd get more pleasure from 113 minutes in a public toilet.

    DW123 Mon Jun 27 2011
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Well, I can understand the frusteration of many people about this movie, I however loved it but it would have been at least nice to at least give us a hint on what happened, it's not like it would change the story anyway. It's still meant of survival, all I'm asking is what happened, I guess I can use my imagination must be what the director intended, but honestly, that's boring, I rather just be told what happenend but don't get me wrong, using your imaginatio to fill in the gap of info is a great idea...still in my oppinion I would have liked an explanation but oh well, the movie still delivers it's intention, survival....

    Leonardo Storti Thu Jun 2 2011
    Report
  • This was a gripping film but could have done with some improvement ( the unbelievable child who seems to have forgotten that this is all he has known) but i think the acting of the main (Viggo Mortensen) is done amazingly and the paranoia of a world where he can trust no one comes across. worth a watch but you properly wouldn't need to watch it all the way through to enjoy it.

    Steve Mon Apr 11 2011
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  • Hahahaha stuart wright likes sheep!

    Ash Lister Thu Feb 3 2011
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star