We Need To Talk About Kevin (15)

Film

Drama

AE_-WNTTAK-02.jpg

Time Out rating:

<strong>Rating: </strong>5/5

User ratings:

<strong>Rating: </strong>3/5
Rate this  

Time Out says

Tue Oct 18 2011

British filmmaker Lynne Ramsay’s third feature after ‘Ratcatcher’ (1999) and ‘Morvern Callar’ (2002) is an adaptation of Lionel Shriver’s best-selling book of the same name, but there’s nothing remotely literary about Ramsay’s long-awaited comeback. She ditches the novel’s structure of an American wife, Eva (Tilda Swinton), writing letters to her husband, Franklin (John C Reilly), in the wake of their son committing a terrible crime, but keeps the book’s darting back and forth in time as we come to understand more of the woman, marriage and family that bore a killer.

Words firmly take a back seat in favour of the haunting power of image and sound as Ramsay turns Shriver’s novel into mesmerising and provocative cinema. ‘We Need to Talk about Kevin’ is intense, first-person storytelling as Ramsay and Swinton draw us into the head and world of Eva, just as Ramsay did with Samantha Morton in ‘Morvern Callar’. Yet there’s also a cutting portrait of a family at its heart that makes home life feel like civil war as Ramsay runs with Shriver’s bold ideas about the alienation of parenthood and its devastating effect on love and marriage. Only in its latter stages does the film settle down – a little – into longer scenes and the need to resolve what happened to Kevin. He’s played by a staggeringly creepy Ezra Miller, who inherits the same know-it-all, spooky demeanour of a younger actor, Jasper Newell, earlier in the movie.

The film is at its best in its first hour or so, when it is most daring. The opening sees Eva’s sleeping dream of being carried aloft at a Spanish tomato festival morph into a waking nightmare of her modest house being attacked with red paint. Tomatoes become paint until soon, via ketchup, there are hints of sirens and blood. Sound design is as rigorously and creatively employed: a prisoner’s scream turns into a baby’s cry turns into the wail of a drill.

The film is full of such clever, teasing juxtapositions as thematic links are made between past and present. A distant Christmas for Eva spent in the bosom of her family dissolves to Christmas present and her solitary life as a teen prisoner’s mother and public outcast. We’re never sure whether what we see is the reality of events or Eva’s memory of them. Context is limited and Ramsay’s take on this story is far removed from social commentary or explanation. This is a portrait of a family, channelled through the memories and feelings of the mother herself.

Ramsay challenges even Pedro Almodóvar for an evocative use of red and the look of her film, as shot by Seamus McGarvey, is fragmented, often blurry, close-up, full of detail, preferring to show Eva’s nervous feet as she exits a courthouse  – Swinton is a physically awkward presence throughout – rather than her face. If some of the family scenes feel like a domestic war movie, with subtle talk of competitions and victories (‘Well, you won,’ says Eva to Kevin on the mini-golf course), others feel like a horror movie: a scene in which Eva drives through her area at Halloween is chilling.

‘We Need to Talk about Kevin’ is thought-provoking, confident and fearless. It’s experimental but never alienating and horrific in all the right ways. It’s great to have Ramsay back behind the camera after too long an absence. Bring on the next one.
98

Comments

Add +

Release details

Rated:

15

UK release:

Fri Oct 21 2011

Duration:

110 mins

Cast and crew

Director:

Lynne Ramsay

Screenwriter:

Lynne Ramsay

Cast:

Tilda Swinton, John C Reilly, Ezra Miller, Siobhan Fallon

Share your thoughts
  1. * mandatory fields

Comments & ratings

Rated as: 3/5 (60 ratings)
  • Even though the superb performance by Watson and supporting cast, this movie tries to depict a dark reality in American soil, which is in no way accurate. Through the strong beginning, we follow Watson's character through her past and present to get a taste of her misery before and after the bow and arrow shooting, but the movie doesn't seem to go past the artistic symbolism and long quiet scenes. Even better it tries to confuse the audience with it's message of nurture vs nature, but never really finds a satisfying conclusion, and Eva never really finds an understanding of what happened. This movie lacks legitimate research beyond a google search, and seems to have a foreign view of American life. What fascinates me more is how Europeans seem to think they have a stronger understanding of American troubles, than American's themselves. One day there will be a movie that does find a true depiction of this subject matter, but "We need to Talk about Kevin," is not it. Instead the story is so far from the truth it should be categorized as a psychological horror.

    David Sun Mar 17
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • I disagree with you about what this movie is about a lot. Here's some of my idea's: I think that "Kevin" was certainly not portrayed as a devil's child. I agree with Callie on this one. Kevin and his mum never really seemed to bond. Instead the opposite seems to happen, their relationship slowly gets worse. From "crying unloved baby" to "ballistic toddler" to a teenager that hates the world. I think in this movie, Kevin has noticed that his mum never really got attached to him. She's trying to look like a good parent, but he sees right through her. She should have confronted him with his bad behaviour - his father should have as well, he just wants to act as if everything's fine. Kevin starts to hate his mum and wanted to show her how bad of a parent she is. He's highly intelligent and plays in to his father's attempts of being a normal family, and probably considers this father to be dumb. I think this is a parents' nightmare - the idea of not loving or bonding with your child right from the beginning. Eva (the mum) keeps looking back to see what she did wrong, so almost the entire movie consists of flashbacks... I don't think she's the only one to blame, maybe partly, but also the father who turned a blind eye to what his child was growing into: a monster (I do think the child ended up as a monster, but not that he was born a monster). If anyone disagrees, don't take it personally this is simply my view. All in all I liked to movie a lot, but I can see why some people would find the artistic way of filming a bit frustrating. There are almost no conversations and it takes quite some time until you find out what happened, and some important questions are never answered ("Why? Or: why not Eva?").

    Laura Mon Jan 7
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • Aurora CO must be disgusted with this movie. Are there not too many similarites to be a coincidence?

    Mike Sat Dec 22 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • PLEASE STOP SHOWING THESE KIND OF MOVIE, MAYBE THESE MOVIE TRIGGERED THE ONE WHO KILLED THE CHILDREN IN THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IN UNITED STATES. PEOPLE WITH BRAIN PROBLEMS SOMETIMES IMITATES THE ONE THEY ARE WATCHING, THEY DO NOT KNOW IF IT IS RIGHT OR WRONG.

    louie Mon Dec 17 2012
    Rated as: 1/5
    Report
  • Brilliant portrayal of a desperately dysfunctional family and of a child who was was born evil. Another Bad Seed.There are so many killers out there who act out and we all wonder how it happened. You need a license to drive a car, You need a license to fish. But anyone can have a baby and raise it without any preparation or license. It's amazing so many of us turn out normal.

    Movie Mavim Tue Nov 27 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • Brilliant portrayal of a desperately dysfunctional family and of a child who was was born evil. Another Bad Seed.There are so many killers out there who act out and we all wonder how it happened. You need a license to drive a car, You need a license to fish. But anyone can have a baby and raise it without any preparation or license. It's amazing so many of us turn out normal.

    Movie Mavim Tue Nov 27 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • I think what most people don't realize is what the son actually has wrong with him, and hate the movie because they don't understand. I have lived with people like this and it is actually quiet horrible. They call it 'Reactive Attachment Dissorder' and most of the time it's not the mothers fault, but in a wierd way it is. RAD is when, within the first two years of a child's life, they do not bond with their mother for whatever reason; in Eva's case, most likely post natal depression. The reason that Kevin did all the bad stuff was to a) get the control back over his life that he lost within those years and b) to show his mother that it was all her fault. I'm glad that someone has finally done something to make this issue a little more known and because of this, I do really like the movie. If you agree with me, read 'the trouble with Alex' by Melanie Allen. It's kinda like this but is all truth. If you think I'm a moron, I don't really want to hear it. RAD is a problem that is close to my heart and I'm just trying to make it clearer to people that dot know. That is all.

    Callie Mon Nov 26 2012
    Rated as: 4/5
    Report
  • Seriously?... We have enough of these stories true on the news all the time. Why make a film about it? Its sad and depressing. Pointless.

    Adam Fri Nov 16 2012
    Rated as: 2/5
    Report
  • Amazing! Off to get the book!.loved it! Omg! That was awesome!! Dark & griping! Lost reaction! One of the best movie ever!! .

    Merle Thu Nov 8 2012
    Rated as: 5/5
    Report
  • My ratings on movies largely depend on how the movie ends and this one missed the mork. I read that the director edited what would have been the perfect way to end and sum up the movie: in the last scene, Eva asks Kevin a question everyone was anticipating 'Why didn't you kill me" - although the question was obvious the edited out answer was classic - "You don't kill your audience."

    greg Sun Sep 16 2012
    Rated as: 3/5
    Report
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  • Hotwise
  • Cool brands
  • Star