6
Add review

Richard Hamilton

1/8
'Hommage à Chrysler Corp' 1957

© The estate of Richard Hamilton

2/8
'Still-life' 1965

© The estate of Richard Hamilton

3/8
'Kent State' 1970

© The estate of Richard Hamilton

4/8
'The Citizen' 1981-3

© The estate of Richard Hamilton

5/8
Marcel Duchamp 
'The Bride Stripped Bare by her Bachelors, Even (The Large Glass)
', 1915–23, reconstruction by Richard Hamilton 1965–66, lower panel remade 1985

© The estate of Richard Hamilton

6/8
'Bathroom - Fig. 2' 1999-2000

© The estate of Richard Hamilton

7/8
'Shock and Awe' 2010

© The estate of Richard Hamilton

8/8
'Sunset', 1974

© The estate of Richard Hamilton

He’s always been more than daddy pop, of course, but until this mighty 18-room retrospective came along, you may have struggled to grasp just how much more. Now, Hamilton’s ‘Richard the first’ tag is revealed in wave after cool wave of innovation. It’s evident, even before his first forays into proto-pop art (note how iconic 1956 collage ‘Just what is it that makes today’s homes so different, so appealing?’ feels like just a stepping stone), in works like ‘Growth and Form’, the first installation you encounter at Tate Modern. This reconstruction (the original was shown at the ICA in 1951) wouldn’t look out of place in one of today’s on-trend art salons – leaping in scale and across media to include x-rays, photographs of galaxies, a horse’s skull, scientific experiments and films.

This is Hamilton engaging with culture but also stepping back from it, almost like an anthropologist. He does so again in the pop years, not only revelling in the kinds of objects and images that were flooding into the country on TV and in magazines after the privations of WWII but really thinking about what it meant for an artist to use such pictures of cars and modern day consumables like toasters and fridges. He’s examining the culture of desire, how we choose, select and edit the world, or how it is done for us on our behalf in the name of commerce, sex or politics. It’s there in his ‘Still Life’ works from the mid-1960s in which he uses Dieter Rams’s stylish designs for Braun as a template, adding silvered paper to create a lustrous, alluring surface – you see yourself, your desire, reflected in the object. Hamilton throws a Duchampian joke about the cult of the artist into the mix, substituting brand names for his own.

Later, he’s exploding the myth of the 1960s, picking apart the fantasy of  ‘Swinging London’ in his ‘Swingeing London’ series – again he uses as shiny surface, this time in the handcuffs that Mick Jagger and art dealer Robert Fraser hold up to shield their eyes from the press. Darker drives pulse through his ‘My Marilyn’ works from 1965 which, based on contact sheet images crossed out and scratched by the movie star, echo Monroe’s self-obliteration.

A more overt note of dissent creeps in, first in his critical portrait of a monstrous-looking Labour leader Hugh Gaitskell, then in the ‘Kent State’ series of prints that use repetition not in a blank Warholian way but to amplify a sense of appalled helplessness. The interior – Hamilton’s great subject – shifts in mood and tone, starting off as celebratory, optimistic, then gradually becoming more claustrophobic and chilling – nowhere more so than in his ‘Treatment Room’ (1984), one of the most darkly humorous installations you’ll encounter.

All this would feel academic were it not for Hamilton’s evident love of materials – in flourishes of carefully controlled paint, flashes gold leaf, even loo roll, which features in his ‘Flowers and Shit’ series.

Too often, art seems to exist in a parallel world, quite separate from everyday life, but with Hamilton you get a sense not only of his artistic development but of the cultural and political development of the twentieth century, a great sweep of sixty or so years from pop to the Iraq war. This is one of the last shows in which Hamilton had direct involvement before his death in 2011 and he would have certainly enjoyed the fact that his grandest statement was taking place in a building as iconic as Tate Modern. After all, in the 1960s, when he first travelled to New York and saw Frank Lloyd Wright’s Guggenheim Museum, he foresaw the rise of art, the artist, the museum as statement, image and brand. It’s taken the rest of us this long to catch up.

Martin Coomer

See our preview of the exhibition here.

Event phone: 020 7887 8888
Event website: http://www.tate.org.uk

Average User Rating

5 / 5

Rating Breakdown

  • 5 star:3
  • 4 star:0
  • 3 star:0
  • 2 star:0
  • 1 star:0
LiveReviews|6
3 people listening
caroline t

A friend and I went to see this exhibition with her 3 year old daughter…and we all loved it! Little Milly had such perceptive comments about the work. She loved the bright pieces ….and knew exactly which ones to walk by! - about the line of prints of Mick Jagger she said 'They're all the same!' Don't worry if you have children with you, you'll have such a good time talking about the work and listening to their comments. Oh yes…and you'll be in the presence of Richard Hamilton's amazing view of the world.

Curated London

Richard Hamilton invented Pop Art. At least, he was the first to coin the term, as well as to provide an accurate and enduring definition. It is in this context that many visitors to Tate’s mammoth retrospective will view his work, and the reason they may be a little disappointed.


British artist Hamilton was a singular talent. Studying at the Slade in the late 1940s, he worked at the cutting edge of contemporary art until his death in 2011 at the age of 89. This exhibition features his paintings, prints and photography alongside his richly-detailed installations and the plans that enabled them. He had a rare combination of great technical skill (his draftsmanship was remarkably clean and precise) combined with wit and creativity. These latter qualities are perhaps most in evidence in his political protest pictures from the 1990s and 2000s.


Many will expect an exhibition of the Grandfather of Pop Art to be filled with work only of this period. In that respect, they are likely to be disappointed. For as times changed, Hamilton’s work evolved; he, like the rest of the world, left Pop Art behind in the 1960s. Accordingly, the show as a whole feels a little staid - monotone, even. It’s also fair to say that some of the pieces are definitely showing their age. Fun House, in particular, was groundbreaking in 1956 when it was first shown at the Whitechapel Gallery, but now feels very tired.


There are some gems. If Fun House looks a little dated, theTreatment Room and Lobby installations both remain engaging and erudite. War GamesOrthodox Rendition and Shock & Awe are sardonic observations on our involvement in the Middle East. They continue to be relevant up to 20 years later. 


Over all, this huge collection of Hamilton’s work is well worth visiting. Just don’t expect too much Pop Art.


For more art in plain English, visit http://www.curatedlondon.co.uk


Kate Janoskova

An excellent exhibition that reminds you why you should drag your friends along. It covers everything, eases you gently into how RH progressed in his thoughts, influences, it's funny (you really can not suppress a chuckle in 'Flowers and shit' room). And leaves you energised and thinking about how to improve your life and bring more depth and thought to the most ordinary objects and actions.

Ann Smith

Great historic exhibition - a chance to see some iconic work first hand, nothing like the real thing, a must go see for all those interested in Art and Design and the the way we see the world today..