Time Out says
Joaquin Phoenix and John C Reilly offer plenty of odd-couple chemistry in this enjoyably off-beat and heartfelt western.
You don’t need a deep love of westerns to get a kick out of Jacques Audiard’s (‘Dheepan’) wry, surprising, and often plain hilarious frontier story set in 1851 Oregon and California. Sure, there’s all the shootouts, smoky saloons and liquor-soaked gunslingers a genre aficionado could ask for, but at its generous heart, the Frenchman’s first English-language film is a road movie about a pair of bickering siblings who just happen to be bounty hunters. The emotional beats are deep-felt and the one-liners come thick and fast. It’s contemplative at times too, taking time to chew over its characters’ hopes and dreams. Imagine ‘Midnight Run’ with saddle sores and you wouldn’t be too far from the mark.
Audiard immediately establishes the lethal bona fides of the brothers, Charlie (Joaquin Phoenix) and Eli Sisters (John C Reilly) – and their odd-couple chemistry – with a striking nocturnal gunfight. It begins with distant muzzle flashes and a bullet-ridden cabin and ends, like so many of the scenes to come, with the pair grousing enjoyably at each other. This job, it turns out, was on behalf of the pair’s paymaster, a malicious and mostly unseen figure known as ‘The Commodore’. Soon he has another one for them: to trek across the state and kill a man by the name of Hermann Warm (Riz Ahmed), a guileful chemist with a new formula for refining gold. To make things easier, Jake Gyllenhaal’s detective, John Morris, will have him apprehended and ready to turn over. At least, that’s the theory.
In practice, ‘The Sisters Brothers’ has nothing as conventional as a straightforward chase in mind. Tweaking the 2011 novel by Patrick deWitt with his long-time co-writer Thomas Bidegain, Audiard pares back auxiliary characters to draw a bead on this contrasting quartet. Each of them is fully drawn – and beautifully played. Gyllenhaal inhabits the thoughtful, Henry David Thoreau-quoting Morris with a deep-lying sadness, while the ever-impressive Ahmed’s Warm is well named: his belief in his fellow man has been shaken by the prejudice he’s suffered but his underlying goodness remains.
This is very much the brothers’ movie, though, and unlike the urbane Morris and the humanist Warm, Charlie and Eli are very much of the Old West. They’re happier swinging punches and wielding irons than negotiating the niceties of a San Francisco hotel. Reilly sells a very funny scene where Eli discovers toothpaste for the first time, sniffing it suspiciously before embracing the concept of dental hygiene with gusto. He finds real depth in the character too. Eli is still haunted by dreams of the brothers’ abusive father and his greatest desire is just to go home and open a shop. Phoenix, meanwhile, has a blast as the trigger-happier sibling, a ball of pent-up id who picks drunken gunfights and is visibly crestfallen when the Sisters brothers’ violent reputation hasn’t preceded them.
You’d be hard-pressed to identify this as a film made by the man behind powerhouse prison drama ‘A Prophet’ and gutsy survivors’ tale ‘Rust & Bone’ (although to the deer in the former and the killer whale of the latter, you can add an icky plot curveball involving a spider going somewhere it really shouldn’t). Despite its sizeable body count, it’s a sunnier piece of work than the dreamlike social-realist dramas that came before it. And for a newcomer to the genre – or maybe because of it – Audiard brings real freshness and wit to the frequent gunfights. ‘The Sisters Brothers’ may be a violent movie but it’s not an especially graphic one; the bad guys are coolly dispatched from a distance with minimal Peckinpah-y splatter. The one genuinely stomach-turning moment comes at the hands of a surgeon, not a gunslinger. Prepare yourself.
Cast and crew
John C Reilly