Film, Drama
5 out of 5 stars
4 out of 5 stars
(12user reviews)

Christopher Nolan’s overwhelming, immersive and time-bending space epic ‘Interstellar’ makes Alfonso Cuarón’s ‘Gravity’ feel like a palate cleanser for the big meal to come. Where ‘Gravity’ was brief, contained and left the further bounds of the universe to our imagination, ‘Interstellar’ is long, grand, strange and demanding – not least because it allows time to slip away from under our feet while running brain-aching ideas before our eyes. It’s a bold, beautiful cosmic adventure story with a touch of the surreal and the dreamlike, and yet it always feels grounded in its own deadly serious reality.

It’s hard to talk about the story without ruining its slow drip of surprises. So let’s be vague. Cooper (Matthew McConaughey) lives with his family – his father-in-law (John Lithgow) and two young kids – in a not-too-distant future where living off huge fields of corn is the only business around. Dust storms brew, and there’s an apocalyptic vibe, as if the Depression of the 1930s had been transplanted to a dying Earth.

Cooper has a strong bond with his daughter, Murph (Mackenzie Foy). But when this former pilot is given a chance to head a mission into space, he grabs it. It’s all very Messianic. This rough-and-ready everyman’s destiny is to join a secret project to save the Earth directed by the ageing Professor Brand (Michael Caine). And so he blasts into orbit in the company of Brand’s daughter (Anne Hathaway) and two other scientists (Wes Bentley, David Gyasi). This is no bus hop to the Moon: their aim is to slip through a wormhole near Saturn and search for other planets capable of sustaining life. Let’s just say that their return ticket is flexible.

You might understand the science (influenced by the involvement of physicist Kip Thorne), but the chances are you won’t. Yet still ‘Interstellar’ inspires trust, and all the formulae and ample talk of wormholes is best taken as mood music. Also, despite the cosmic canvas, ‘Interstellar’ is still one of the most earthbound films to date from Nolan, and the one most in tune with its emotions. Even with Nolan’s early hit ‘Memento’ (2000), before he took on ‘The Dark Knight Trilogy’ (2005-2012) and ‘Inception’ (2010), we knew we were exploring fairly chilly movie worlds. Nolan is ably assisted in this respect by a cast you can believe in. The real star is McConaughey: his earthy grit and family-man vulnerability are well placed: we believe his tears when the reality of multi-decade space travel sets in. Meanwhile the father-daughter relationship between Caine and Hathaway hits home with a sharp brutality.

And brutal is the word: this is a sharp, tense experience. There are some staggering visual coups: an ocean rising up to form the largest wave imaginable; a space ship floating past the rings of Saturn; a late scene which turns our perceptions of space and time on their head. But alongside these thrills are moments of intense danger, and Nolan makes us feel the threat, honing in on mechanical problems and other everyday risks.

Parallels to Stanley Kubrick’s ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’ are more than obvious; they’re ingrained: we’re invited to wonder at staggering imagery and listen to unnerving silence as well as Hans Zimmer’s organ-heavy score. Nolan even offers his own spin on Kubrick’s HAL 9000 by giving us a shiny, walking robot that’s by far the cutest thing on display. But where ‘Interstellar’ is more Spielberg than Kubrick is in the strained family relationships at its heart. Yet the final tone is all Nolan’s: the film’s devastating emotional strands refuse to give way to empty sentiment and are embedded in a fractured sense of a nightmare unfolding before the eyes. You’re better advised to come armed with an encyclopaedia, not a hankie, although in a seriously imaginative climactic scene – almost impossible to explain – science and sorrow are powerfully united.

Often when we talk about cinema being a ‘ride’, we’re hinting at a lack of substance, an absence of ideas, an opportunity to switch off. Not so here. ‘Interstellar’ is, in large part, a spectacle. But it also asks you to think hard, look hard and urges you to return for more. Why only ask for the stars when you can have moons, distant planets, extra dimensions, lectures on physics and a sobering shot of terror? ‘Interstellar’ has it all.


Release details

Release date:
Friday November 7 2014
169 mins

Cast and crew

Christopher Nolan
Christopher Nolan, Jonathan Nolan
Matthew McConaughey
Jessica Chastain
Casey Affleck
Michael Caine

Average User Rating

3.8 / 5

Rating Breakdown

  • 5 star:5
  • 4 star:4
  • 3 star:1
  • 2 star:0
  • 1 star:2
1 person listening
1 of 1 found helpful

Yes, it is a remarkable and impressive film that combines some great physics to tell a moving father/daughter story, I went in sceptical and prepared to be underwhelmed but was totally caught up in the story and drama. I'll forgive them ignoring black hole spaghettification and recommend this must see film. I also liked the subtext that global warming will destroy the world slowly but surely for our children and the baby boomer era will be reviled by the future generations facing extinction.

1 of 1 found helpful

I saw this film yesterday with my family, including a daughter who sometimes fails to follow plots very well, so I was nervous about taking her to a long complicated film.  As the credits rolled I turned to her and asked, 'well?'.  She replied 'That was amazing!'  And that really sums it up, all 4 of us absolutely loved it.  Driving home we caught a radio 4 discussion of it that really didn't like it and we were all yelling insults at the radio.....

I am a science nerd and I confess that occasionally I was irritated by something I knew to be wrong, but it was fleeting and utterly subsumed by the spectacle and the story, the effects and the emotions.  I have read reviews criticising the dialogue but none of it grated with me.  

In summary, this was a film that blew away 2 40 something cynics and 2 CGI saturated teens and left us all feeling we had seen something immense.


We all know Christopher Nolan knows how to make large scale epic films. Interstellar is no exception. The film looks absolutely stunning, from start to finish, with every scene gleaming in a sharpness other blockbusters lack. For a relatively slow and lengthy film, it never really drags. Add to this some top drawer actors who step up to their roles and you've got a recipe for an award winning film. But...

The plot. Nolan can't help but try and make a very simple story line far more complex than it is. Using a bit of Inception magic, I can't help but fell he has tampered with a pretty linear plot line, only to make it seem so stupid that it thinks it's so clever. This doesn't stop the film from being watchable but makes me wonder if Nolan has hit his peak and it's all going to be downhill from here. Let's hope he proves me wrong. 


A beautifully shot film. Some original ideas but the film just ended up disappearing up its own denouement, all too confusing and you walked out of the cinema trying to work out what it was all about and what Nolan was trying to tell you. I am a big fan of Nolan's work and his style but this is never a 5 star film. A good film but quite flawed. 

The CGI was impressive though, you never felt divorced from the image on the screen by bad chroma-key effects or poor rendered planets but the dust storms at the start of the film did feel a tad artificial, CGI particle physics is getting better, fire looks pretty realistic these days but water and dust can still come across as harsh and unreal.


At times you'll need a degree in physics to understand the plot, but if you sufficiently suspend your disbelief and concentrate on the relationship between Matthew McConaughey's astronaut hero and his adoring daughter, who is devastated when he abandons her and his troubled family to save humanity, you will be moved. Too much of the plot has holes--how can a former pilot, now a farmer, who hasn't worked for NASA for years suddenly jump into the latest spaceship and into deep space without any training? Or why would he especially leave his emotionally vulnerable daughter, who clearly will crumble without him, for a huge gamble to save humanity? Wormholes and black holes aside, the way in which we negotiate relationships with others becomes the focus for the film (but Anne Hathaway seemed wasted and inept alongside the emotionally powerful McConaughey). It's a long film, so be prepared to work hard to keep up and stay tuned.

Engrossing science fiction drama, not quite the masterpiece that  most critics have declared it to be but impressive cinema nonetheless.

Interstellar looks impressive and sounds profound. Somehow though the heart of this film is as cold as the space into which it projects it's cast. It doesn't matter if they save the world; it's if they make us care.

Zimmer and Nolan together again !.Irresistable. Saw the movie today & was completely satisfied on all fronts. A steal for a 7.50 cinema ticket.Go see it soon

0 of 1 found helpful

Just seen it - a bum-aching bore, wanted to leave. Flabbergasted at the gushing reviews! Losing my trust in Time Out after this one. It's all because Christopher Nolan is hip and has a name, never mind he's made an overlong turkey of a film.

0 of 1 found helpful

Just one of the worst movies I have ever seen – frankly SciFi channel is better. Bloated, self-indulgent, incoherent, mawkish drivel. Average special effects and sub average performances. You could drive a space station through the plot holes and still get it mired in the appalling dialogue. My girlfriend was asking if we could leave after about half an hour.I gritted my teeth to see how it ended and spent the last 45 minutes just begging for it to be over. Rarely have I seen a film so utterly devoid of any redeeming features.