‘Chess’ review

Theatre, Musicals
2 out of 5 stars
4 out of 5 stars
(9user reviews)
 (© Brinkhoff-Moegenburg)
© Brinkhoff-Moegenburg Tim Howar, Michael Ball and Cedric Neal
 (© Brinkhoff/Mögenburg)
© Brinkhoff/MögenburgAlexandra Burke
 (© Brinkhoff-Moegenburg)
© Brinkhoff-Moegenburg Cassidy Janson
 (© Brinkhoff-Moegenburg)
© Brinkhoff-MoegenburgMichael Ball
 (© Brinkhoff-Moegenburg)
© Brinkhoff-Moegenburg Tim Howar
 (© Brinkhoff-Moegenburg)
© Brinkhoff-Moegenburg Tim Howar

The tunes are magnificent, but the iconic ‘80s musical has not aged well

From the decade that brought you the daft musical about cats and the daft musical about trains, it’s the return of ‘Chess’, the daft musical about, you know, chess.

Originally running for three years in the West End from 1986, ‘Chess’, by Tim Rice and the blokes from Abba (aka Benny Andersson and Björn Ulvaeus) has a genuinely fantastic score, perhaps one of the few musicals between ‘West Side Story’ and ‘Hamilton’ to meaningfully sound like a worthwhile product of the popular music of its day. ‘I Know Him So Well’ and ‘One Night In Bangkok’ were actual pop hits, and the other songs are mostly on the strong side, all pulsing synths and hummable ballads.

Laurence Connor’s new production – the latest in the ENO’s semi-staged series of musical theatre revivals – has the vocal talent to do justice to its score. Michael Ball is great. Alexandra Burke is great. Cassidy Janson is terrific. The lesser-known Tim Howar (the current singer of Mike and the Mechanics for his sins) has a wonderfully versatile rock voice. The ENO Chorus is just peachy. If this was just a concert, it would be a good concert.

But holy moly does the rest of ‘Chess’ feel dated.

For absolute starters, the plot feels like it could only have come from a very specific era in which a non-ironic yarn about bad-boy Cold War chess players (ikr?) seemed like a viable scenario for a musical.

This is not actually quite as weird as it may sound: the showdown between douchebag American chess champ Freddie Trumper (srsly) and his Soviet rival Anatoly Sergievsky is rooted in an era marked out by tremendous chess rivalry between the two superpowers, the ‘colourful’ US champ Bobby Fischer, and multiple Soviet player defections to the West. In 2018, though, the idea of chess as the new rock ’n’ roll is not an easy one to swallow, not least because of how spectacularly dull the lengthy scenes of actual playing are. The production leans heavily on Terry Scruby’s period pastiche videos to try and enliven the static action on Matthew Kinley’s vaguely ‘Tron’-like set, but they only half-succeed.

Nonetheless, with that score, you could forgive a multitude of sins if it was possible to understand what any of the characters’ motives were. However...

After demolishing Trumper (Howar) on the board, Sergievsky (Ball) defects to the West, abandoning his wife Svetlana (Burke) and child and shacking up with Trumper’s Hungary-born PA Florence (Janson). Despite the general emotional eloquence of the better songs, it is never really clear specifically why Sergievsky ditches his family or why nobody really seems particularly fazed by this. Perhaps wisely making no effort to do an accent, Ball’s poker-faced performance is great in the singing department and not great everywhere else. Admittedly he has almost no material to work with in terms of Sergievsky’s motives: ‘Chess’ began life as a concept album, and it still feels like a collection of songs bound by the flimsiest threads of exposition.

Elsewhere, there’s iffy gender politics and dubious racial depictions: I could just about smirk at the kitschy othering of Russia and Eastern Europe, but the orientalist cliches in the yellowface-y Bangkok sequence are pretty gross and almost totally unnecessary.

Part of the problem, I suspect, is that Connor has become the one-size-fits-all director to ENO’s musical theatre strand, and really ‘Chess’ could do with somebody a bit more specific to bring it into the present, somebody who can appreciate both the strength of the songs but do something fun with the plot. This feels trapped in between: there are smatterings of irony, but they don’t trouble the clunkingly un-self-aware main story.

For all its faults, ‘Chess’ clearly has something going for it, but this revival feels like a gambit that hasn’t paid off.

Average User Rating

4.4 / 5

Rating Breakdown

  • 5 star:6
  • 4 star:0
  • 3 star:1
  • 2 star:1
  • 1 star:0
1 person listening

I sadly never saw the original production back in the 80’s when this was a blockbuster musical up there with Phantom, Cats, Les Mis, Miss Saigon et al. I’ve waited a long time for the revival & this didn’t disappoint. It felt dated but more in a “period setting” than irrelevant way. The music was great with clever choreography & a high tech stage which provided stunning visuals. Such of the chorus pieces sounded almost operatic in the Coliseum’s vast auditorium. Micheal Ball puts in a star turn & got a spontaneous standing ovation mid way through the show. I found some of the close up camera work a bit jarring & unnecessary. All the soloists are good, the cast was far bigger than I expected & the large orchestra is visible making this a really impressive theatre event.


There are some great hits in here such as ‘One Night in Bangkock’ and ‘I Know Him So Well’. It starts off with the same swagger as Rocky IV and the mythology about the origins of the game is atmospheric. However, despite the visually stunning set it sacrifices a lot in numerous plot-holes and poor character development.


The acting, singing, choreography, orchestra and set were absolutely phenomenal (ENO always knows how to make a show a magnificent spectacle), however, I cannot forgive how bad the plot is... The story lacks the driving force to explain why the characters were motivated in their actions or to give a proper conclusion to. Not enough character development happened to make me feel sympathy for any of the characters.


Fire eaters, stilt walkers, aerial silk dancing, a company of fifty people, a large orchestra - and this is semi staged! I can't imagine what they would do if they were to go for extravagant. The music is great, the choreography is fantastic, all four of the main stars are exceptional. The world has changed so much sine the 1980s that this has become Historical Period Drama and has a timeless quality that it did not have at the time. This is lavish overblown opera and the Coliseum is an amazing venue for it. I loved it! 


Phenomenal! What a show!

Go see it now!

The set and songs were just amazing, Michal ball what a legend.

I’m so glad they did this revival 25 years on! Go see it I guarantee you won’t be disappointed.


Great music with wonderful singing. Amazing set and tech work! Funny and interesting which I was not expecting from a show about chess! Also, the set makes it so that even restricted view seats are not missing the action! I would definitely recommend going! 

Saw this last night, it's SPECTACULAR. Cast, score, orchestra, set and design all incredible. Much better than the 80's version. Plot a little confusing until we bought a programme in the interval, which explains it beautifully, but even that didn't detract from the joy of the set and the music! Highly recommend.

CHESS represents a quite extraordinary and singular accomplishment in musical theatre: Essentially, it is universally loved by anyone who has anything whatsoever to do with musical theatre.

The reason for this, is NOT that it is in any way remotely elitist; it is because the score, the songs, the emotional sentiment, the lyrics, are all of a quality which is simply dazzling. It is intelligent, it is passionate, it is beautiful, it is subtle, it is angry, it is intense, it is romantic, yet it is authoritative whilst being anti-establishment. The story depicts selfishness and arrogance whilst juggling self-sacrificing and demureness.

I had the great pleasure in seeing the original at the Prince Edward Theatre back in the late 80s and was looking forward to this revival. Whilst the semi-staged nature of the production means corners have been cut in terms of the chessboard ballet (which originally accompanied the chess match sequence) the replacement projection montage which displays a multitude of unsettling memory jerkers from the Cold War era, was superbly achieved — clearly your reviewer has a very limited understanding of the period and the skills required to traverse it with such fluidity. Their merciless criticism of this section in particular, is entirely unwarranted. And the pathetic, mealy 2-star rating won’t remotely reflect the great joy which countless theatregoers will garner from seeing and hearing this spectacular revival.

As one who knows both the UK and US recorded versions intimately, I found a few of the reworkings and lyric changes a tad disconcerting, but chalked this up to my familiarity. There are times when such tweaks are deemed necessary by the creative team and one should respect their right to experiment so long as the body of work as a whole is not harmed. Chess is a musical which is blessed with so many core strengths, that it is almost impossible for those amazing qualities not to shine through - they are certainly much in evidence in this marvellous, vibrant ENO revival.

I urge anyone who has never seen it, to snap up a ticket. You are sure to recognise 3 or 4 of the hits from the show and the written-through score provides pulse and energy throughout.

This is like saying Miss Saigon is outdated, how about Phantom or Les Mis? They go back even further......