Worldwide icon-chevron-right Europe icon-chevron-right United Kingdom icon-chevron-right England icon-chevron-right London icon-chevron-right Richard Rogers: 'buildings belong to people, cities belong to people'

Heads up! We’re working hard to be accurate – but these are unusual times, so please always check before heading out.

© Royal Academy of Arts

Richard Rogers: 'buildings belong to people, cities belong to people'

The forward-thinking architect reflects on his six-decade career

By Martin Coomer
Richard Rogers confesses to not being 'a natural looker back'. For the designer of space-age buildings like the Centre Pompidou in Paris, Lloyd's of London and the soon-to-be-finished Leadenhall Building (the 'Cheesegrater') in the City, it probably goes with the territory. But as the Royal Academy stages the survey exhibition 'Inside Out' (a reference to Rogers's buildings, many of which wear their ducts, lifts, staircases and waterpipes proudly on their facades), the architect finds himself taking stock of a six-decade career that has seen him scoop major awards including the Stirling Prize and Riba Gold Medal, becoming Baron Rogers of Riverside in the process.

It's interesting in the City at the moment, with your Leadenhall building going up right across the street from Lloyd's. How does that feel for you?
'I love it. I believe very much in a dialogue between buildings - I believe it's always been there. I think buildings have different identities and live very well next to each other. We always have the shock of the new and that's fine. The renaissance style is totally different from the medieval and they have a dialogue across time. Looking at Lloyd's and Leadenhall is interesting because they're only divided by 30 years. I thought Lloyd's, when we were making it, was the ultimate in technology. It looks like it's been handmade if you look at it now. And that's the natural thing. You have to modernise, you have to change, you can't just be traditional for the fun of being traditional.' A retrospective is an opportunity for reflection, but I imagine architects prefer to look forward...
'You're probably right. I'm not a great looker back. But this show is not really about architecture. I really didn't want to make another show about that. It's called "Inside Out" because of the way I design - I put ducts and services on the outside which gives you greater flexibility. But the main thing about it is ethos. By which I mean fairness. In a society of greed I think it's very important, and I do think we are now in a society of tremendous greed. I'm not attacking individuals, I'm attacking the system that allows for that situation, and for the bank failure that we've all suffered from. It's basically deeply rooted in greed.'

How can architecture help?
'First of all, I think we have to see ourselves as citizens. I love cities, I spend most of my life talking about cities. And the design of cities does have an effect your life. You're lucky if you can see trees out of your window and you have a square nearby, or a bar, a cornershop, a surgery. Then you're living well.' These can seem like luxuries in a city as big as London…
'They don't have to be expensive but they have to be thought about, so I think architects do shape the society they live in. They have an important role. We have to get planning permission and things like that but in the end what we do is talk. I sit in parliament but you don't have to sit in parliament to discuss things, you can sit in your local pub, which is fine - I enjoy my pub - but in talking, in showing what you do and being proud of what you do and swearing against things that are going wrong, whatever it is, you're making a statement. And I think we should be doing that, we should be fighting our corners.'

People feel very alienated from the worlds of finance and politics. How do you think architecture can address this?
'One of the sections in this exhibition is called "Democratising Architecture". Most briefs are private, and, yes, if it's an office building, obviously it's got to work well, but there's also the passer by, the public to think about, and the public over time, so the building has a responsibility in terms of transparency, of activity. Take the Pompidou. That could have been just a box but the whole idea of the Pompidou is the piazza, which is very popular, and the façade, which is all about the public. Buildings belong to people, cities belong to people, so architecture has a role beyond the narrow private commission.'

What about office buildings?
'Offices are the most difficult. You get 60 floors, they're all the same, they all have to have a dimension between the core and the glass and then you think "what the hell am I doing on this." But what we've done with Leadenhall is put in a seven-storey atrium, which is a public space. And we've built it sloping back so you can see St Paul's while making a very striking skyline. As an architect you're playing with things that are basically public.'

That must require imagination on the part of the client?
'Yes, without a good client you can't do anything but it's a deals situation. With Lloyd's we put the ducts outside and they suddenly got extra useable space in return. So it's a negotiation.' The 'London as it Could Be' section of the show will be particularly interesting to our readers. How do you think London could or should change over the next few decades?
'I think first of all that we're coming to the end of the motorcar. We're already banning it from certain areas and making streets narrow, closing certain streets to traffic. Manufacturers are responding by making cars much smaller. More and more people are going by bicycle, more and more people are going by bus and so on. So all that land which is being used for laying highways, it will become public parks hopefully. I think in the next in 20 years, by which time I'll be 100, cars will play a really minor part.'

Does it frustrate you that you can have an idea in a moment but it can then take ages to happen, if it happens at all?
'You know, London doesn't change exactly the way that might put it together for an exhibition. But it does change. London is a much nicer place now than it was 30 years ago. It's a much friendlier place. We've just got same-sex marriage through in parliament. Fantastic. This couldn't have happened 30 years ago.'

Read more art interviews


Fiona Tan

Art Film and video

The Amsterdam-based artist known for her immersive film installations talks to Time Out about her two London shows: ‘Inventory’, which takes inspiration from the eclectic Sir John Soane’s Museum, and ‘Ghost Dwellings’, an installation which focuses on natural and economic disasters in Detroit, Cork and Japan.  You don’t live in London, so what attracted you to Sir John Soane’s Museum?‘I noticed that when I was preparing for a show in Rome I kept thinking about Soane’s. I had been doing a lot of research into collections and considering how long we’ve had public museums, and his place is very much a starting point to think about that. And of course, it’s fantastic.’ What aspects of the museum did you want to focus on?‘I focused on the areas (where) he hung what he called his “marbles”: all the architectural fragments and things he collected from ancient Rome and Greece. I’m not interested in trying to replicate the museum. Why should I? It’s a unique place and everyone should go – and everyone does, I think. Instead, I was very interested in the idea of the original and the copy, because there are a lot of plaster casts on display. It got me thinking about the medium.’ Is that why you chose to shoot the film on six different formats?‘Basically I decided to choose not to choose. Usually when I’m preparing a piece I make tests with different cameras and I thought maybe it’s interesting to bring that to the forefront in ‘Inventory’ – the fact that there are all these mediums a

Sanya Kantarovsky


Moscow-born, New York-based painter Sanya Kantarovsky has teamed up with performance artist Ieva Misevičiūtė for his show at Studio Voltaire, which is inspired by Mikhail Bulgakov’s surreal, satirical novel about the Devil’s visit to Moscow, ‘The Master and Margarita’. On the opening night, Misevičiūtė performed on a stage shaped like ‘Behemoth’ – the book’s diabolical black cat. A film of the performance is on show in the gallery foyer, while the cat remains as a sculpture-cum-bench from which you can admire Kantarovsky’s spellbinding paintings. Time Out caught up with him. How did the show come about?‘The show came out of a collaborative process with performance artist Ieva Misevičiūtė. Most of the figures in the paintings are based on a series of gesture studies I made of her movements in my studio. When she performs in the gallery space there’s an indexical relationship between her body and the gestures in the paintings.’ How conscious were you of making work for a former church?‘I was responding to the history of the space as a church, which made sense with the novel's Christian meta-narrative.  I approached this as a site-specific installation rather than a straightforward painting show. There was an internal debate about how the space would exist after Ieva's performance because her presence throws the status of the paintings into question. When Ieva is on stage, they comprise an environment for her performance and become contingent on her body.’  It’s very dramatic

AA Bronson & Ryan Brewer, detail of 'Red', 2011

AA Bronson


Time Out falls under the spell of this trailblazing artist

Carol Bove


The sculptor talks about experiencing art, bringing colour into her palette, and her love of crushing things

Show more
Head to our Art interviews page

    You may also like